Skip to main content

Who Is the God of the Google Gods?

James A. Watkins is an entrepreneur, musician, and a writer with four non-fiction books and hundreds of magazine articles read by millions.

The Google Gods

According to the Church of Google, there is no God but Google. Googlists are adherents of Googlism, a new faith based on a personal relationship with Google.

Their website lists nine proofs that Google is God:

  • Google is the closest thing to an Omniscient entity in existence, which can be scientifically verified
  • Google is everywhere at once
  • Google answers prayers
  • Google is potentially immortal
  • Google is infinite
  • Google remembers all
  • Google can "do no evil."
  • “Google” is searched for more than "God," "Jesus," "Allah," "Buddha," "Christianity," Islam," "Buddhism" and "Judaism" combined!
  • Evidence of Google’s existence is abundant.

They believe this new God is better than the old God because while the old God is silent Google always answers the questions of humanity.


The Creepy Line

"Before you get too mesmerized by technology, remember that information is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom" – Sir Arthur Clarke.

The Creepy Line is a 2018 documentary film. From it, we learn that Google handles 86% of all searches on the Internet. Google Chrome tracks everything you do. (Android records even what you are doing offline, where you've been and what you've been doing.)

Data is being used to manipulate us, specifically to shape our thoughts and feelings. All the tech giants filter out information they don’t like. They judge what ideas, thoughts, and words are good and bad.

Google makes results they don't like hard to find by using search list position, knowing few people click beyond page one of the search results. This is mind manipulation. The tech giants promise a neutral platform even as they actively push certain points of view. What they want is to decide what you believe.

Google uses negativity bias to shift opinions. It even manipulates autofill. For political candidates that Google likes, negative stories are hard to find. For conservative candidates, especially President Trump, negative stories dominate search results. You can Google a common word such as ‘Idiot’ and what pops right up? President Trump. For some time searching for the word ‘Nazi' immediately brought up the photograph of President Trump.

There are various ways Google manipulates your opinions and those of billions. For one, if you have Gmail, your emails are scanned to see what kind of person you are, based on how you feel and think about political issues. Any smart device you own is always listening.

Google finds professors to produce academic papers that back its worldview. It also maintains ‘quarantine lists' of sites they don't want you to visit. Google is the world's most potent censor. It can blacklist information on the Internet within 30 minutes. Google even blocked Jordan Peterson because he said, "He is he, and she is she."

Researcher Robert Epstein was attacked by Google because of his work that shows Google shifts search results to favor candidates from the Left and that these shifts can sway a vote by 10% - easily more than the average win vs. loss percentage. In other words, Google can and has elected some people (leftists) and kept others from being elected (conservatives) who would otherwise have won.

Epstein, a scientist, says, ““What we’re talking about here is a means of mind control on a massive scale that there is no precedent for in human history.”

Very few subjects in his experiments realized they were being manipulated. Those who did were actually more likely to vote in line with the biased results, because “We expect the search engine to be making wise choices.” With the help of biased search rankings, “a candidate might be able to get 90% of the uncommitted votes in select demographics,” Epstein explains.

Surveys show that 75% of Americans are totally unaware of any bias on the Internet, thinking it is values-free. But Epstein’s research reveals blatant bias in favor of progressive/socialist candidates, articles, and ideas. The 2016 Election bias was 100% for Hillary.

“Google’s motto is B.S. They are destroying the most glorious gift humanity was granted in the last 300 years. Google is Illuminati. Illuminati is Google. The future under Google is a fascist dystopia, their way or the highway, no room for dissidents, no room for free speech. Google is a boot stomping on your face for eternity.” ~ DAVID BOWIE


Google Loves Democrats

During the Obama Presidency, representatives from Google could be found in meetings at the White House about sixty times each year.

Scroll to Continue

31 Google executives went to work for Obama, and 22 Obama aids went to work for Google. Over Obama’s eight-year reign, almost 250 people went back and forth from working for Obama to working for Google and vice versa.

All the high tech giants are committed to working for the domination of the Left. Employees of Google gave $1.6 million in personal political donations to Hillary Clinton in 2016. Bernie Sanders got $359,000. Donald Trump $23,000.


President Trump and the Deplorables

Soon after Donald Trump was elected President of the United States of America, a video came out that had been filmed in the highest offices of Google headquarters. It shows executives alarmed, confused, depressed, and angry at the election results.

They are heard expressing determination that they will use their power as the Google gods to stop the Trump agenda and the global populist movement. They are overheard vilifying Trump supporters and conspiring to stop President Trump from fulfilling his campaign promises.

Kent Walker, VP for Global Affairs, says on the video that supporters of Trump are motivated by fear and hatred. The founder of Google, Sergey Brin, calls Trump voters “fascists.”

The Good Censor

‘The Good Sensor’ was the title of an 85-page Google internal company memo that was leaked to the press. It pronounces that because Donald Trump was elected to the presidency, “The American tradition of free speech is no longer viable.”

The document further declares that Google and the other high tech behemoths “control the majority of online conversations” and must implement “a shift towards censorship” to make sure the election of Donald Trump is “a blip in history.”

It states that free speech on the internet, which it acknowledges was the promise made to consumers, must come to an end, because it was merely a “utopian narrative” that must give way now, having been “undermined” by the “bad behavior” of deplorable Trump voters.


News Searches

When used to search for news stories, Google is incredibly bigoted against conservative news sources. CNN it loves and showers favor upon.

A PJ Media study found that if you Google the word ‘Trump,’ out of the top 100 results 95 of them are from left-wing sources. CNN got 20 hits, the Wall Street Journal 3 and Fox News 2. No stories appear from any other conservative sources.

Another study found that 96% of the Google search results for the word ‘Trump’ are for stories that denigrate the President.


Fact Checks for Thee But Not for Me

Google now fact checks conservative websites but not liberal sites. It tells users that Vox, ThinkProgress, Slate, Huffington Post, Daily Kos, Salon, Vice, Mother Jones, New York Times, and Washington Post are the reliable, trustworthy sources of news.

All the high tech companies are in a conspiracy to block any opinions that do not agree with an extreme leftist worldview. They are most assuredly anti-Christian and anti-American.

Manipulation of Keyword Searches

In the final three weeks of the 2016 Election, articles favoring Hillary were made easy to find on the Internet by the Google Search Engine, but items that were pro-Trump were challenging to find, according to an extensive analysis done by Robert Epstein and his colleagues.

It got worse after the election. Leaked internal company emails reveal Google employees are scheming to manipulate the results of searches for keywords, such as ‘travel ban' and ‘illegal immigration' to squelch conservative points of views and promote the politically correct opinions.

Searches for keywords such as ‘minimum wage' ‘abortion' ‘global warming' and others never showed articles from conservative sources on the first page of results. Most people do not venture beyond the first page, and Google knows that.


Google: the Defender of the Faith - Islam that is

Internal memos from Google unveil decisions by employees to manipulate algorithms in order to stop the “Islamophobia” of “haters” by making sure that when one searches for “Islam” or “Muslim” only positive stories appear.

Think about the fact that there are Islamists around the world openly calling for, carrying out, and celebrating the mass murder of Jews and Christians but that is not what worries Google. It is not worried about the 30,000 Islamic terror attacks since 9/11. It is worried about Islamophobia in America, which has killed precisely nobody.


Adsense Demonetization

Demonetization is also a powerful weapon on the arsenal of Google. I know this first hand. If you wrote articles that are pro-choice, pro-illegal immigration, pro-homosexual behaviors and ‘marriage,’ pro-transgender, Google will place ads on your article and essentially pay you for writing it.

If you wrote against these leftist positions, it would not put ads on your article. You will be ‘demonetized.' You won't be able to make a living (unless you are a salaried writer, of course) because Google controls 75% of all online advertising.

Personal Assistant Prejudice

Google Home, the voice-activated virtual “personal assistant” created to compete with Amazon’s Alexa, has some built-in quirks. When asked for Breitbart News it responds with a recorded anti-Breitbart tirade from the Huffington Post. Asked for any left-wing news source, it takes you right to the source.

When first released, if it was asked, "Who is Jesus," it gave the consumer the silent treatment, but it was ready to tell you all about Mohammed, Buddha, or Satan.


Google Employee Bigotry

Author Scott Cleland writes in his book about Google, “They are the gatekeepers of all the world’s information, and everything they do has a political angle to it.”

A leaked email to employees of Google by management claims: “We need to stop hate speech and fake news because that is how Trump won the election.” It has also been revealed the Google implemented employee training courses “dedicated to bashing conservatives and Trump supporters.”

The Human Resources Department at Google issued instructions to managers on “inclusiveness” that threatened punishment if they were caught approving of individual achievement or merit because these are traits “valued by the American white male dominant culture.”

The Google engineer who was fired for questioning the company’s (possibly illegal) diversity policies, James Damore, is suing over his dismissal. He claims that the corporation from the top on down denigrates conservative views and conservative people, and endorses hatred towards conservative employees, if they are found out.

Company manager Paul Cowan openly blacklists employees who hold “dunderheaded opinions about religion, about politics, or about social justice.”


Leftist Corporations

Google and the other big information technology providers are all working for the radical hard-core Left. They believe national sovereignty is outdated, indeed that the nation-state, including the United States, ought to cease to exist, making way for Global Governance.

To bring this about, they push open borders, promoting the idea that all people on Earth should be able to move to America if they so desire, thereby dissolving the national identity of our country. They support illegal immigration and sanctuary cities. In fact, they believe America should be a global sanctuary. They care not a whit how this affects the current American citizen.

That is why all you hear from these leviathans is ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion,’ by which they mean less white men. They most certainly do not mean ‘diversity of opinions, ideas or worldviews.’ There, they seek a monopoly—and to crush dissent.

As Carl Horowitz writes: “Right now, the opinion that matters most is that President Donald Trump, and the ‘hatemongers’ who support him, don’t fit into America’s future. The mission is derailing the Presidency of Donald Trump.”

Burning Man

The founders of Google see it as a religious movement, outwardly as Atheist, like most all the high tech companies in Silicon Valley, but for the inner circle it is something else entirely. Google’s founders are big on the 'Burning Man' religious cult, which I liken to a postmodern Golden Calf.

So what goes on at a Burning Man Festival? Here is an eyewitness report by Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz: "Thousands of people wearing bizarre costumes dance around a huge burning effigy that represents Celtic human sacrifice. Scattered around the pentagon-shaped camp are various makeshift temples to pagan gods. Moving through the crowds is a gigantic seven-headed serpent.

"Though the organizers claim the festival is not religious in nature, several elements appear regularly at the festival that are firmly rooted in idolatry. A 70-foot long seven-headed red metal dragon on wheels named for the ancient Egyptian god Abraxas is clearly intended to reference Satan as described in the Christian Book of Revelations.

"The Burning Man festival culminates in the eponymous ceremony in which a large wooden effigy of a man is burned. This ceremony, referred to among Druids as the “wicker man,” is almost universal among pagan cults.

"The camp is carefully designed in a semicircle contained within a pentagon. But when viewed from the air, it becomes clear that the angles are connected by lines creating a pentagram, the universal symbol of witchcraft and black magic.

"These people are not atheists. They are idolators. The difference between atheism and idolatry is that atheism denies God while idolatry is an attempt to replace God. They are trying to replace God.

"The people who create this technology [Google and AI] ... their intent is mind control. Truly modern people who were atheists would reject pentagrams and idols and believe there is no controlling power. The aspect of mind control comes from the idolatry giving control to dark forces.”

How about another report, this time from Thomas Horn: "Recent attendance at The Burning Man, which is behind the Google philosophy, surpassed 15,000 Wiccans, Satanists, goddesses, white witches, nudists, and a consortium of other lost party-goers, who converged on the hot Nevada desert for a Labor Day weekend of what they call "glorious Hell on earth."

"These neo-pagans go into a trance, perform rituals, burn sacrifices to pagan gods and goddesses, dance in the nude, engage in sex, and otherwise "express" themselves and become one with the demon-goddess ‘Gaia.’

"Attendees set up theme camps such as "Lost Vegas," "Motel 666," and "Crucifixion With a Celebrity.” Hamburgers are sold by devil-worshippers at the McSatan cafe, and T-shirts are available that proudly proclaim, "Praise The Whore." As in the Whore of Babylon.

"On Saturday night, the hell-themed festival reached its crescendo in the form of a drama. These people were literally celebrating the fact that one day they would enter Hell. To simulate their journey, the camp’s center stage was transformed into the "Vestibule of Hell."

The guest of honor was none other than "Papa Satan."As the lecherous Papa Satan bowed in mock chains before a placard reading "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved," a group called "Idiot Flesh," dressed as hooded executioners, began to play a discordant dirge accompanied by flashing strobes.

"While massive loudspeakers pumped out a hellish bass tone accompanied by tormented screams, people dressed as demonic insects celebrated by copulating with other captured souls. It was a scene that looked as if it had been plucked from a horrific nightmare. Mesmerized by the evocative music, the performers began to chant, "Devil’s delight, fire tonight!"

All photos in this article are from the Burning Man Festival.



James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on April 03, 2020:

T ~ Oh Lord it's hard to be humble . . .

Today is like the first day of spring outside. I actually put on shorts and a short sleeved shirt for the first time in months to walk my dogs around the park down the road. Beautiful day. Sunshine and 66 degrees.

The Logician from then to now on on March 31, 2020:

James, don’t be so humble. We all know you are a living documentary on just about any subject, well your articles are!

My guess is your wife’s philosophy is, as the saying goes, “Why buy a cow when you can get milk for free?“

:-) don’t mind me, I’m bored today.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on March 31, 2020:

T ~ I would give it to support their cause. But my wife is very frugal, which has proved to be a good thing for us as a couple. We do support the Prager U. channel.

The Logician from then to now on on March 30, 2020:

Son of a gun! I heard this on Mike Gallagher’s radio show this morning and he said Salem was offering it free for 60 days because a major theater outlet refused to show it. He kept repeating free for 60 days so I just got the link without looking at it.

Either he had it wrong or I was hearing things.

I agree $20 is a lot especially when we know what it is about anyway.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on March 30, 2020:

T ~ I want to see it for sure. I followed the link you kindly provided. Thank you. Unless I missed something, they want twenty bucks to see it. I'll have to think that over. It's probably worth it but my wife might have a fit if I spend that much on a documentary.

The Logician from then to now on on March 30, 2020:

James, and the rest, have you seen this? Watch this movie for free for next 60 days!

Best documentary of 2019

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on December 28, 2019:

Kelly Ann Christensen ~ Thank you for reading my article. I am well pleased that you found it interesting, and I appreciate you letting me know you did.

Kelly Ann Christensen from Overland Park, Johnson County, Kansas on December 27, 2019:

“The American tradition of free speech is no longer viable.”

This is an interesting article, most especially in light of our experiences with YouTube, Blogger, Facebook, etc., in recent years.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on November 18, 2019:

T ~ Yes it is. I came across that quote and recognized it was the same guy you had given me a link to last month. I am going to get his new book. I have the last one, Springtime for Snowflakes.

The Logician from then to now on on November 16, 2019:

Corporate socialism - this is profound isn’t it?

Unwary dupes? No shortage of that species. Although I wonder just how unwary Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on November 16, 2019:

“The only way to make sense of the politics of such organizations as Google, Facebook, Twitter, et al and how this politics is reflected in its technologies is to see Big Digital as the leading edge of an economic and governmental conglomeration that aims to monopolize human life on a global scale.

“Big Digital’s political ambition is to establish a two-tiered system consisting of global corporate-cum-state monopolies on top, with “actually-existing socialism” for everyone else. I call this two-tiered system “corporate socialism,” which I choose over the term “techno-feudalism,” used by others. I have very good reasons for adopting the name corporate socialism rather than techno-feudalism, not the least of which is the penchant of the monopolists for using socialist rhetoric and ideology in their attempts to bring the two-tiered system into existence.

“Corporate socialism aims to arrive at a singular, one-world state, with vast globalist monopolies controlling production. These monopolies would be paralleled by a socialism or equality of reduced expectations for everyone else. Unwary dupes like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez serve corporate socialists by habituating the masses to this state of affairs.

“The objectives of corporate socialism are ushered in under the guise of an economic and social equality, an equality of reduced expectations for the vast majority. The corporate socialists don't need equality; equality pertains strictly to the majority deemed destined to live under the reduced expectations of “actually-existing socialism” on the ground.” ~ Michael Rectenwald, The Google Archipelago

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on October 13, 2019:

T ~ Thank you for the link to that fascinating video of Dr. Michael Rectenwald. I just bought his book after watching the video.

The Logician from then to now on on October 12, 2019:

Interesting, what a former communist has to say about Big Tech!

Dr. Michael Rectenwald was a professor at New York University and he jokingly describes himself as having been a lifelong Communist, "to the Left of the Bolsheviks" before he ran afoul of his wokester peers in academe.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on September 21, 2019:

Thank you very much "t" for the link to that interview. Within five minutes I had ordered Spaulding's book. I'll let you know after I've read it.

The Logician from then to now on on September 20, 2019:


This interview with Brigadier General Robert Spalding who served at the White House as the National Security Council’s Senior Director for Strategic Planning is interesting!

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on September 19, 2019:

WOW T! I had no idea it ran that deep. Now we see how Big Brother and the Mark of the Beast will fit together. Thank you for all the needful information.

The Logician from then to now on on September 18, 2019:

Have you seen this YouTube channel that called The Hated One? This piece is about the manifold evils of Google. Below is a redacted transcript of the voiceover.


Google has been secretly developing a covert version of Google Search for the Chinese Communist Party in order to enter the vast Chinese market.

At the request of the Chinese government, Google will link users’ mobile phone numbers to the search terms they’ve used. This is to help the government crack down on dissidents and activists and to become more efficient overall at censoring the Internet.

This revelation should have been unsurprising, as Google had essentially been doing this in the West for ages. Whenever you search for something, Google will create a server log that will remember your browser and OS configuration, IP address and a unique cookie planted on your device by Google. The link you click on from the results is logged and Google will keep a record of the websites you visit from there.

If you don’t delete this cookie, it will only expire in 30 years, essentially logging your entire digital presence. From there, it’s easy for Google to link your search history to your phone number, via any number of Google services for which you’ve signed up, like Gmail, YouTube, or Google Play, regardless of whether your phone is an Android.

If they can’t get your number from their services, Google has partnerships with Facebook, Twitter and other tech platforms to exchange that information with them. If that doesn’t work, Google turns to its 100,000s of third-party partners and data brokers like Acxiom to buy your phone number from offline databases.

Thanks to Ed Snowden, we know that all Google servers are tapped by intelligence agencies in the US and in the Five Eyes Alliance countries of the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The US National Security Agency has a copy of your search history tied back to your phone number forever in their data centers.

If you signed up for Gmail, you didn’t just give up your phone number, but some precious information unique to your biology. Ever since Gmail came to existence, Google has been actively scanning your emails for keywords to expose you to more ads in your inbox. But Google also used your private emails to study your writing style and the way you type. Similar to how you walk is unique to your person, the way you hit keys on your keyboard and your writing style also belongs to you only.

This allows Google to identify you across your whole Internet presence, even if you create pseudonymous accounts on public forums like Reddit. In 2017, Google promised to stop active scanning of Gmail messages, but it was revealed that Google continues to let third-party app developers that use Gmail to scan users private emails.

These third parties are even allowed to further share your emails to their partners, thus multiplying the amount of copies. If you ever deleted your email or even your entire Gmail account, Google visually fulfills your request, but residual copies are kept in their offline backup systems indefinitely and Google doesn’t go after the third-party developers to delete their copies of your emails. Your private emails thus remain copied and stored in data centers across the globe with unknown security and no oversight.

Google uses your browsing history not only to target you with ads, but to identify you as well. Google only needs snippets of your browsing record to be able to determine identities of users on the web. Google tracks your browsing history through AdSense, DoubleClick and various other advertising and tracking scripts that belong to the company.

Google+ share plugins on websites are used to track users, even if they logged off or never used Google+, similar to how Facebook tracks browsing history through like and share plugins. Where cookies don’t work, Google uses your unique ID number that is assigned to every Android device by default.

This ID is continuously followed and cross-referenced with the rest of your record to constantly keep it up to date across all platforms and devices. If these policies aren’t aggressive enough, Google purchases the remaining browsing records from data brokers, internet service providers, internet exchange points or content delivery networks.

Google really wants to know where you go. So much so, that it keeps tracking your location even if you tell it not to. The first time Google was caught tracking users location on their Android phones and tablets was through triangulation of nearby cell towers servicing users’ devices.

This information was collected even when users turned off location services, never inserted a SIM card in their phone, or even after factory reset. There was no way for users to opt out.

Google said this collection was put in place to improve message delivery, although it wasn’t really clear how that could work. Nonetheless, Google promised to turn this feature off and stop collecting location data for users who turn off location services.

That was a lie.

Even with location history turned off, Google can use any app activity to keep a minute-by-minute record of your location but you wouldn’t have any visual way to find out about it.

To confuse users, Google hid the option to turn off this collection under “Web and App Activity” settings, where this kind of collection would not be expected by an average user.

This year is a big milestone for Google. 40% of global ad spending is expected to take place online, outspending TV advertising by $40 billion. Google achieved dominance in digital advertising thanks to their focus, commitment and sheer will – the will to know every single step you take.

Google is able to attract advertisers thanks to their ability to profile records of your entire activity on the web. By partnering with MasterCard and other credit card companies, Google to now has access to roughly 70% of credit and debit card transactions in the US and they’re able to track what you buy even in physical stores.

The search giant is able to retrospectively compare these profiles with the aggregated databases of offline purchases to identify individual purchasing histories. Google tracks offline purchases in order to prove advertisers when online ads make impressions that translate into physical transactions.

Digital profiles in Google’s databases contain very detailed information about users likes, preferences, interests and private thoughts. There might be numerous trade secrets, undisclosed agreements, and technologies developed by Google that are generally unknown to win the race to get inside people’s minds.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on September 01, 2019:

Brad ~ You are welcome. I totally agree with you that we do agree on most things.


Brad on August 31, 2019:


As I said in your AGW hub, we agree on more things than we disagree.


James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on August 31, 2019:

Cristine Abigail ~ Thank you so much for coming back by. I appreciate your funny joke. Laughter is good medicine. God Bless You.

Cristina Santander from Manila on August 29, 2019:

Just read this article again, it is worth coming back to this article. I wonder if there is relationship with Amazon burning(joke). Have a great day !

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on August 22, 2019:

Brad ~ Thank you for taking the time to read my article. I appreciate your excellent comments as well. Why Google doesn't want to work with our government but will work with China is because Google is anti-Christian and pro-Socialism, two powerful traits it shares with the Chinese government. I think most of the people at Google hate America and would aid and abet our enemies in a heartbeat.

I totally agree with you that Google is "a monopoly and they can rewrite history, or hide it better than Atlantis."

Brad on August 20, 2019:


I would add that Google works in mysterious ways!

I didn't know about the burning man, and I never connected google to religion just politics.

What is your thought on why google won't share their AI with the US government, but is sharing it with China. China is not run by religion are they?

My other thought on google is the they are a super conglomerate monopoly and they can rewrite history, or hide it better than Atlantis.

They and the government use and abuse the data they collect.

Good news is there are too many copies of the Bible in book form for them to change it. But they can still put a twist on the Internet for the new generation that doesn't really do books.

google needs to be regulated, as does FB, Twitter, and HP.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on August 17, 2019:

T ~ You are exactly right.

The Logician from then to now on on August 16, 2019:

If this stuff was happening to the left it would be front page news everywhere forever until google be taken down! but hardly a mention in the MSM!

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on August 16, 2019:

Thank you 'T' for that extraordinary video. I was just reading this morning: "A Google staffer today released documents exposing a massive censorship campaign where the ubiquitous Google search engine purposefully censored pro-life and conservative web sites, including"

The whistleblower said, "I saw something dark and nefarious going on with the company and I realized that they were going to not only tamper with the elections, but use that tampering with the elections to essentially overthrow the United States."

The Logician from then to now on on August 15, 2019:

Google insider goes public

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on August 09, 2019:

T ~ Yes, I have seen those videos. In my article I do talk about Dr. Epstein, in the section subtitled "The Creepy Line" as follows:

Researcher Robert Epstein was attacked by Google because of his work that shows Google shifts search results to favor candidates from the Left and that these shifts can sway a vote by 10% - easily more than the average win vs. loss percentage. In other words, Google can and has elected some people (leftists) and kept others from being elected (conservatives) who would otherwise have won.

Epstein, a scientist, says, ““What we’re talking about here is a means of mind control on a massive scale that there is no precedent for in human history.”

Very few subjects in his experiments realized they were being manipulated. Those who did were actually more likely to vote in line with the biased results, because “We expect the search engine to be making wise choices.” With the help of biased search rankings, “a candidate might be able to get 90% of the uncommitted votes in select demographics,” Epstein explains.

Surveys show that 75% of Americans are totally unaware of any bias on the Internet, thinking it is values-free. But Epstein’s research reveals blatant bias in favor of progressive/socialist candidates, articles, and ideas. The 2016 Election bias was 100% for Hillary.

The Logician from then to now on on August 07, 2019:

James have you seen this?

A different Epstein, but you won’t find this one reported on in the MSM, otherwise known as the FAKE NEWS!

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on July 21, 2019:

T ~ Thank you for the video and transcript. I am a huge fan of Dennis Prager and so is my wife. He tells it like it is. Which infuriates the Devil's minions.

The Logician from then to now on on July 17, 2019:

Prager at Senate hearing yesterday - an accurate display of the despicable actions of youtube, which is owned by Google!


Do you think the media will cover this like it should be covered? So far I don’t see a word on it and it happened yesterday!

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on July 15, 2019:

T ~ Yes, my friend, I do believe a backlash is gaining in force as more and more people - even those only mildly interested in politics - see the horridness of the insane Left. This morning Scott posted a link to an article from CNN that really shocked me in its viciousness and its obvious malicious mendacity. And I am not easily shocked.

The Logician from then to now on on July 15, 2019:

The more this sort of thing occurs and is brought to people’s attention (especially by Trump) the larger his base will grow and the more people will realize the extreme prejudice of the press.

Ratings of the media are reflecting this already, in spite of it Trump’s approval rating at highest level, higher than Obama at this point,

This sort of thing could be the best thing Google and the media can do to discredit themselves. They may own the airwaves but they don’t own a reasoning mind....yet.

I saw this:

“In January of 2017, I bitterly proclaimed on social media that I would never be able to understand how anybody could vote for a man who stood before a cheering crowd & mocked a reporter’s disability.

That’s when somebody sent me this...”


James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on July 15, 2019:

A friend of mine just wrote to me: "I just googled these names separately: Michelle Obama, Melania Trump, Barrack Obama, and Donald Trump. It’s no surprise all positive raving articles on the Obamas and 99% negative, lies on the Trumps came up."

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on July 14, 2019:

T ~ Thank you very much for helping me get some traffic for this article. It has been pretty slow, only 16 views this month and 5 this week. Maybe I can generate a resurgence through Facebook groups. I'll work on that this week.

The Logician from then to now on on July 12, 2019:

James, how is the traffic going on your article? I am curious because of the upcoming censorship summit. Sure would like to see your article get attention in relationship to this summit.

Even an originally left leaning site has seen the light check out this link!

Everyone should do what they can to get traffic for your article now. I sent it to Forbidden knowledge, everyone should do the same! Send James article to

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on July 03, 2019:

T ~ I must say, old chap, you are spot on with your comments, especially this: "Google is autocompleting the search fields of billions of users with false information (topics ranging from natural health to candidates for election), based not on objective search volume data, but an extremely biased political and socio-economic agenda."

Now a message from our sponsor:

The Logician from then to now on on June 30, 2019:

This is new! Recently, a shocking discovery was made: Google is autocompleting the search fields of billions of users with false information (topics ranging from natural health to candidates for election), based not on objective search volume data, but an extremely biased political and socio-economic agenda -- one that is jeopordizing the health and human rights of everyone on the planet.

On June 3rd, 2019, it was discovered that Google had scrubbed their search results clean of natural health sites, resulting in some losing as much as 99% of their traffic. Soon after, it was discovered that Google also manipulates users with their autocomplete function into thinking that natural approaches to health are fraudulent and even harmful. This is Part 2 of our ongoing series exposing these practices. Read this:

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on June 25, 2019:

T ~ Thank you very much for the link to that shocking article. It is a real eye-opener.

The Logician from then to now on on June 24, 2019:

James, this just came out:

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on June 04, 2019:

T ~ I LOVE that video. Thank you for providing the link. I was blessed to meet Dennis Prager when he came to our church a few years ago. I am also a big fan and sometime supporter of Brent Bozell.

I appreciate you coming by and reading my work. I enjoy our fellowship.

The Logician from then to now on on June 04, 2019:

Just got this message to share with you from Prager U! Big Tech Is Big Brother.

Thanks to your article and things like Prager U more and more people can be made aware of what is going on.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on May 10, 2019:

A B Williams ~ Yes, I agree with you. It is very frustrating. Well, we will hang in there. I want to thank you for coming back by with your encouraging word. I am bolstered because of you.

A B Williams from Central Florida, USA on May 09, 2019:

James, the double standard is so frustrating! I am often tempted to stop writing for HP, because of this very thing. But, then I am reminded that we are a small number represented here and so, I hang in there.

I just take a lot of breaks! ;)

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on May 09, 2019:

Claremont Institute has launched a campaign to engage our fellow citizens in discussion and debate about what it means to be an American. As part of that effort, we have begun to point out the increasingly existential danger of identity politics and political correctness to our republic.

As if to prove our point, Google has judged our argument as wrongthink that should be forbidden. They are now punishing us for our political thought by refusing to let us advertise to our own readers.

Google, either its algorithm or some individual, had a look at my essay launching our new campaign for a unifying Americanism, “Defend America—Defeat Multiculturalism.” They decided it to be in violation of their policy on “race and ethnicity.

One of my colleagues spent two hours on the phone with Google to determine whether we could appeal this ruling or determine which section of the essay was in violation. The response, in short? There is no appeal; we recommend you remove the content to bring yourself into compliance.

I went on to make the case against multiculturalism, identity politics, and political correctness—the holy trinity of the modern left.

The naïve observer of Google’s policy and action against us might conclude that merely to mention race and ethnicity is forbidden. Not so: we are unaware of any report of Google censorship of the numerous progressive groups that promote the prevailing creed of identity politics based on race and ethnic identity. The trouble with Claremont’s argument is its furtherance of a politics that counts people as individuals rather than members of racial or ethnic groups.

What Google is really doing (like Facebook, Twitter, and other platforms) is policing the terms of American political debate to advance acceptable establishment ideology. In First Amendment parlance, Google is in the viewpoint discrimination business.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on April 26, 2019:

Christine Abigail ~ Thank you ever much for taking the time to read my Hub. It is so nice to hear from you again. I am glad you found it to be enlightening and interesting. And you are welcome.

God Bless You


Cristina Santander from Manila on April 24, 2019:

Great hub ! Great revelations!! Very interesting !! Thanks for bringing it out to the light. Stay blessed.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on April 10, 2019:

School Girl For Real ~ You are most welcome, my friend Rose. Thank you for reading my article and for your lovely laudations.

Faithfully Yours,


schoolgirlforreal on April 08, 2019:

WOW! Just read part of this, and I'm like.......not good, but not shocked either. For years I've been aware of crap like this, similar stuff---but it's only those who seek TRUTH who find it....right??? so sad that so many are mislead. but a great article to shed some light on truth!!!!! Thank yOU as always, james.....great work.


James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on March 23, 2019:

A B Williams ~ We shall see what we shall see. Thanks again.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on March 23, 2019:

Well Lyle Christiansen! It is a distinct pleasure to 'see' you here, my friend and fellow Michigander. Thank you for all you said. And thanks for reading my article.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on March 23, 2019:

Vivian Coblentz ~ Thank you ever much for the awesome accolades. We need "a techie David!" I love it. And yes, we sure do. I am also going to use DuckDuckGo. That is a good idea. I appreciate you for sharing my article. God Bless You!

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on March 23, 2019:

Awdur ~ Your praise means the most to me. Thank you for your ongoing faith in me, which inspires me.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on March 23, 2019:

Paula ~ You are quite welcome. I appreciate your encouragement and your lovely laudations. You brought a big smile to my face with your words: "you sure do light a raging fire under us and within us." In that case, I have done my job. :D

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on March 23, 2019:

T ~ I hope it does go viral. But you're right, the powers that be might not appreciate it.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on March 23, 2019:

Readmikenow ~ Thank you for taking the time to read my article. I appreciate your gracious compliments.

James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on March 23, 2019:

A B Williams ~ Thank you very much for sharing my article. I am humbly honored that you would do so. And I'm with you: Bible study and prayers are definitely in order. :-)


James A Watkins (author) from Chicago on March 23, 2019:

T ~ Thank you so much for your kind compliments. Just this morning I see this on the news: "New research from psychologist and search engine expert Dr. Robert Epstein shows that biased Google searches had a measurable impact on the 2018 midterm elections, pushing tens of thousands of votes towards the Democrat candidates in three key congressional races, and potentially millions more in races across the country."

A B Williams from Central Florida, USA on March 22, 2019:

I agree, powerful stuff!

I've shared it, not sure if it will be seen though.

Lyle Christensen on March 22, 2019:

First class James. I think you should be interviewed on national and international media and especially this article should be promoted and exposed for all to see and understand.

Vivian Coblentz on March 22, 2019:

OMG! I must live a sheltered life, I had no idea such satanic rituals were going on! How horrifying!

When doing research for my articles, I have noticed that Google buries negative information I need and also positive conservative information I am looking for. I have been using DuckDuckGo as a search engine because it does not track you, and I can find the info I need there.

I am starting to miss the Dewey Decimal System for finding info.

We need wealthy conservatives to come together and create a social media platform to topple the Google Goliath. We need a techie David!

Another of your articles I will be sharing! Fabulously researched, as always.

Awdur from Chicago on March 22, 2019:

Fascinating, alarming, and frightening. Hopefully, your right to "free speech" will be upheld here without repercussion. Excellent, EXCELLENT job!

Suzie from Carson City on March 22, 2019:

Mindblowing!!! T...with our cooperation, this CAN and will go viral. I'm on it! This is personal violation, attack, rape, brain-washing, immoral, and we cannot sit still for it. The masses must WAKE UP!!

James....I don't even know what to say to you anymore. You render me speechless. But you sure do light a raging fire under us and within us. Thank you, thank you, God Bless you and keep the priceless info coming! To Awareness & Action! Peace, my friend,,,Paula

The Logician from then to now on on March 22, 2019:

If this article doesn’t go viral I can only believe it will somehow be due to google making HP take it down- watch out James!

Readmikenow on March 22, 2019:

I'm overwhelmed, but also, my worst suspicions have been confirmed. Excellent article.

A B Williams from Central Florida, USA on March 22, 2019:

I second that response T!

James, WOW!

My lunch break today will be spent in bible study and prayer and this one will definitely be shared.

Just how numbered are our days?

The Logician from then to now on on March 22, 2019:

Wow, i suppose you won’t find any of this reported in the mainstream media?

Did I miss the 60 minutes show about this? Because what you have presented James has to be the biggest, most startling and revealing article that has hit the internet in years - certainly more sensational than what Trump said on the Access Hollywood tape from 2005 that we still hear about!

James I’m beginning to think you are half human and half computer, how else can one person pump out such deep and diverse analysis of almost anything clandestant?

Related Articles