Skip to main content

Ethiopian Christianity Part 1: The Writing of the Kebra Nagast, Sacred Book of The Lost Ark Of The Covenant


Geography and history mostly isolated the Ethiopian Orthodox Church from the rest of the Christian world until the 20th century. The Ethiopian king converted to Christ in the 4th century, about the same time as the Roman Emperor Constantine. Unlike other Christian populations of the East, Ethiopia successfully resisted Muslim military power, but they were isolated from the rest of Christendom by it. Rumors circulated in Europe about a powerful, wealthy Christian kingdom in Africa, but little was known for sure. For 1,000 years, Muslim controlled territory separated Christian Europe from Christian Ethiopia. The Kebra Nagast, first brought to Europe in the 18th century by Scottish explorer James Bruce, was not translated into English until the 1920s. Needless to say, this text is not well known in the West. The Kebra Nagast explains Ethiopia’s Jewish heritage, its three thousand year old monarchy beginning with the son of Solomon and the Queen of Sheba, and, most important of all to Ethiopians, the story of how they came to possess Israel’s Lost Ark of the Covenant.


Illuminated ancient Ethiopian manuscript, with Madonna & Child and St George & the Dragon

Illuminated ancient Ethiopian manuscript, with Madonna & Child and St George & the Dragon

Rumors of Legends


Since I was a teenager I’ve seen hints in documentaries and articles about the legends of Ethiopia. Everyone seemed to have a slightly different version – that Solomon tricked the Queen of Sheba into his bed, that he married her, that their son stole the Ark of the Covenant from Solomon, that the priests of Jerusalem asked him to take the Ark to protect it from abominations, that Solomon gave his son the Ark, that Solomon gave only a replica of the Ark. Recently I found a copy of the Kebra Nagast, and read the original for the first time. In this series of hubs I’m going to discuss how the Kebra Nagast was written, the story it tells, and how this compares with Old Testament writings about the same people and events.

Ethiopian church carved from solid rock, probably about 10th century

Ethiopian church carved from solid rock, probably about 10th century

Motives For Writing the Kebra Nagast


The Kebra Nagast was compiled at a critical juncture in Ethiopian history. From an ancient date, Ethiopia was ruled by an unbroken dynasty of emperors. Most of Ethiopia followed a First Temple Judaism, a form dating from before the Babylonian captivity of 697 BC. (Some Ethiopians were still animists, adherents of the “nature religion” more typical of Africans.) The Ethiopian monarchy converted from Judaism to Christianity in the 4th century, and by the 11th century much of Ethiopia had also become Christian. But a powerful Jewish faction remained, mostly living in strongholds in the mountains. In the year 1030 the Jewish Ethiopians, led by Queen Gudit, attacked the Christian capitol, killed the emperor and most of his family, and claimed the throne. One son of the emperor escaped, went into hiding, and raised a family to continue his line. The victorious Jewish Gawa Dynasty held power until 1270, when the Jewish ruler abdicated in favor of Yekuno Amlak, direct descendent of the deposed Christian emperor. Reasons for this abdication have never been clear. With Yekuno Amlak, Ethiopia returned to a dynasty which claimed a more than 2,000 year history. To commemorate this historic event, the new emperor had the history of his family written into a book, along with other religious oral traditions. The result is the Kebra Nagast.

Is the Kebra Nagast History or Propaganda?


This timing causes some to look cynically at the Kebra Nagast as a propaganda tool for Yekuno Amlak, who probably felt some insecurity in his position. An extreme version of this cynical view suggests that Yekano Amlak “invented” a history for himself, to bolster his claim to power. Other historians point to cultural, religious and linguistic clues which support events presented in the Kebra Nagast. (See The Sign and The Seal, by Graham Hancock, for details on this.) Historians are divided: some think the writings have a basis in real events, others that they were invented to serve the purposes of those in power.

Is It Scripture?

In Ethiopia, this book is scripture. The Kebra Nagast is taken literally, at face value, in all details. Many Christians still regard the Old and New Testaments this way, although in the past few generations a significant number have come to regard some portions of the Bible as either allegorical or, as the Catholic Church states, “Spiritual truth, not scientific truth.”


While many Western scholars see the Kebra Nagast as based on some real events, they do not consider it a history book in the same way as the writings of Romans like Pliny the Younger, or the Jewish historian Josephus. I expect this is at least in part because of not only the number but the magnitude of its miracles. All sorts of natural explanations have been offered for many of the Bible’s miracles: the Red Sea apparently parts of its own accord when conditions are right, huge flocks of quail like those that fed the Hebrews regularly land in that same desert, minerals in the mud of Palestine are known to cure certain types of blindness, and some believe this is the basis of some of Jesus’ healings of the blind. But the Kebra Nagast features miraculous events like Solomon’s son traveling in a caravan which covers thirteen days march in one day, because angels lifted and carried all the wagons. The young man himself doesn’t notice how he is being whisked along until the end of the day.


As I read through the Kebra Nagast, I kept referring back to the Old Testament. Many of the same figures are there, even some quite minor characters. I saw the Kebra Nagast adding events and details the Bible is silent about, rather than offering alternate versions. The Kebra Nagast even made me notice some details I hadn’t previously, such as Solomon having only one recorded son. I did not see direct contradictions, leading me to agree with scholars who argue these oral traditions grew up among a people familiar with the Old Testament and respectful of its authority.



This series of hubs will explore the historical background of the events described in the Old Testament and the Kebra Nagast, and compare the histories presented in each. The hubs will also look at the history of the worship of God in Ethiopia, from Jewish background to Jewish and Christian present.

An Ethiopian Orthodox priest

An Ethiopian Orthodox priest

Scroll to Continue


Tim Truzy from U.S.A. on October 16, 2020:

Interesting. Logically, Egypt is crucial in the Bible as well as mention of Ethiopia. People forget: many books were removed from the Bible which probably would have shed even more light on the topic you wrote about. I don't doubt the historical relevance of the text you mentioned wit regard to Christianity and Judaism.

People may not know Solomon is a figure in the Islamic faith as well, and these topics cross in the religions with Abraham as crucial in these faiths.

On another note, to underscore what I'm saying: The DNA of priests from Ethiopia has been traced to the priesthood of Judaism, startling many in Israel. The modern state of Israel was primarily founded by people from eastern Europe. It should be noted, Jews of darker complexion were ignored for many years by Israel, but that is changing.

Much as the Catholic Church canonized some books of the Bible and left out others, some would rather Jewish texts, and the one like you wrote about, be forgotten. Great read.

graceomalley (author) on December 04, 2011:

no body - Thank you for visiting! Christianity has some little known history. I spent the summer in India on a work mission when i was a teenager, and i learned although india has a Hindu majority, there has been a Christian minority there since the first century. Missionaries who came to India from Europe in the 19th century discovered to their surprise that there were already Christian churches, with a long history. Indians say that Jesus' disciple Thomas traveled to India and taught them about Him.

Robert E Smith from Rochester, New York on December 04, 2011:

So many Christians think Africa has known no evangelism in the long history of Christianity. But Africa at one point was all evangelized and the gospel was preached on the whole continent despite the Muslim persecution for it. As far as these legends, I tread lightly with extra biblical stuff. Look forward to reading more of the series.

graceomalley (author) on April 21, 2011:

Slarty-Glad you liked the hubs!

Ron Hooft from Ottawa on April 20, 2011:

Great hubs. Love to see people interested in history.

graceomalley (author) on April 14, 2011:


Nice to see you here!

I think that is a good observation, I am of the opinion monotheism suits more organized societies - societies which run by rule of law rather than the clan system of alleigence. History also seems to indicate that Monotheism introduces the idea of a "just" and reliable God, as opposed to the more capricious deities of polytheism.

I think the monotheistic view of the nature of God reflects how modern or what we call "developed" societies see themselves. The polytheistic worldview - lots of different spiritual powers with their own agendas, and human beings often caught in the cross fire - I see as reflecting more the experience of tribal people.

So I see the worldwide move towards monotheism connected to the type of societies people were in the process of building.

William Thomas from That Great Primordial Smash UP of This and That Which Gave Rise To All Beings and All Things! on April 12, 2011:

Great hub graceomalley! I love that picture of the old man at the bottom. He looks like a "patriarch" or something. This is a nice introductory start on a kind of lost chapter of the history of world Christianity.

I think its interesting that this Kebra Nagast, Ethiopian Christian scripture mirrors and amplifies the Old Testament. It is also interesting to note, as you do, that the Ethiopian emperor converted to Christianity around the same time that the Roman ruler did. I guess it was a global movement, leaving polytheism behind in favor of monotheism.

Off to read part two.

Related Articles