Having researched disinformation tactics for the last five years, I am now publishing a series of articles on the subject.
Collapsed WTC Building 7
World Trade Center Building 7
I'm writing this article World Trade Center 7, The Facts and the Disinformation to expose what is known about a topic that many Americans are simply unwilling to openly discuss. I thought that by now, fifteen years after, what I call the Crime of the Century but what most people simply refer to as 9/11, that most of America would have the knowledge that three buildings collapsed on their imprint on September 11, 2001 but that doesn't seem to be the case.
I wrote an article several years ago, entitled 9/11 Truth According To Me and at the time thought that doing so might be considered professional writing suicide because it is such a sensitive subject and many people in our society would prefer not to have to think about the event. However I received a very positive response even though many people didn't buy into my theory. Since then two very important and popular books written in fictional form have been published supporting my theory. These two books Methodical Illusion and Methodical Deception written by Rebekah Roth both describe fictional events that reveal exactly how the No Plane Theory, detailed in the above mentioned article could have worked.
It is very gratifying to know that other people also came to the same conclusions I did, especially considering the amount of grief, ridicule and disdain I have endured from friends, family and the general public, due to my willingness to share my ideas as early as 2004.
Building 7 was a 47-story skyscraper built as part of the World Trade Center Complex, in 1984. It collapsed on its imprint, very similar to a controlled demolition that we have all seen on TV, at 5:20 p.m. in the evening on September 11, 2001, despite "not having been hit" by an airplane and only had small office fires and very little damage.
Building 7 was the Command Center for OEM, New York City's Office of Emergency Management and many other government agencies had offices inside this building including but not limited to the CIA (Criminals In Action), DOD (Department of Defense), the IRS (Internal Revenue Service), the Secret Service and most importantly the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) which was investigating and housed all the records for the infamous Wall Street fraud cases. Incidentally all these cases had to be dropped when it was learned their entire records inventory was destroyed in the WTC 7 collapse, how convenient.
What is interesting to note is that the OEM had recently reconstructed their offices with bullet proof glass, bomb-proof walls and hurricane resistant windows. This office on the 23rd floor was installed with state of the art military communication equipment and sophisticated logistical technology at a huge cost to New York taxpayers.
The collapse of WTC Building 7 was not even mentioned one time in the official 9/11 Commission Report, which I have read. This book was very well written but left out some incredibly damaging evidence that is clearly known and documented and did not subpoena one document or report from any Government Agency. Evidently the writers and editors relied solely on the notion that all witness reports and documentation was the truth, without feeling the need to verify any of the information through our intelligence services, WOW!
To further describe the incredible lack of documentation of this event, NOT ONE, Television News Station in America covered the collapse of WTC Building 7, NOT ONE! Hello, Anybody Home?
One more fact that has not been widely reported is the owner of WTC Building 7, Larry Silverstein took out a huge insurance policy on this building in July of 2001, with a special clause that included "in case of terrorist attack" for One Billion Dollars. For his foresight he was able to reap a cool $500 Million in pure unadulterated profit by convincing U.S. District Judge John S. Martin that the collapse of this building was a direct result of the two separate terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center Complex.
But what I would like to point out here is that on a PBS interview two years later Larry Silverstien, admits that he and the firefighters on the scene but not in the building fighting the fires decided the best course of action was to "pull the building'. In demolition terms and lingo, this means to initiate a controlled demolition. What is important to recognize is that it generally takes two to three weeks for demolition crews to set up and install explosives to "pull a building" and yet somehow this was done in a matter of hours?
Now that we have the facts, let's take a look at some of the interesting information pertaining to this story that has been carefully censored from American society, shall we?
WTC Building 7 Collapse
Engulfed In Flames
Other Skyscraper Fires
World Trade Center Building 7, is the first modern Steel Framed building EVER to collapse due to fire. Let me repeat this for clarification purposes World Trade Center Building 7, is the first modern Steel Framed building EVER to collapse due to fire. EVER!
In the entire history of planet Earth, no other Steel Framed building has EVER collapsed due to fire. To the right I will provide photographs of Steel Framed buildings engulfed in flames that didn't collapse. Some of these buildings were on fire for almost a complete day (20 hours) and didn't collapse, on some of these buildings fires were on every single floor and didn't collapse. Now some of the buildings did experience partial collapse but the entire structure remained intact.
Compare the above video footage to the photographs to the right and tell me in the comments section if this makes any sense to you? Because there is absolutely no way that Building 7 should have collapsed due to fire. The only way it makes sense is if it was a controlled demolition as Larry Silverstien let slip in his PBS interview.
- The most famous building is the Windsor Building in Madrid, Spain, that burned for 20 straight hours and was completely gutted, despite being of a far less durable construction technique of reinforced steel concrete frame. This building which caught fire on February 12, 2005 was completely engulfed in flames and the fire was ultimately allowed to burn itself out and yet only a part of the top ten floors, collapsed.
- Another Steel Framed building to catch fire and burn intensively is the Mandarin Oriental Hotel fire on February 9, 2009, in Beijing, China. This building was 520 feet tall and was completely engulfed in flames for 4 hours however it did have a full height hollow interior atrium that allowed for further structural integrity.
- The Caracas Tower, was another Steel Framed high rise, that caught fire on October 17, 2004 burned for more than 17 hours spreading to 26 floors but failed to collapse, despite the intense heat that sent over 40 firefighters to the hospital.
- The One Meridian Plaza fire in Philadelphia on February 23, 1991, started on the 22nd floor of the 38 story Steel Framed skyscraper and raged for 18 hours and yet despite many broken windows no part of this building collapsed.
- The First Interstate Bank Building in Los Angeles was 62 story Steel Framed Building that caught fire on May 4, 1988 and completely destroyed four stories from the 12th to the 16th and yet again it did not collapse.
Of these five buildings, many of which were entirely engulfed in flames, only one experienced a partial collapse, at the top and yet all of these buildings Steel Frames remained intact. An interesting photograph is the bottom one in the series showing what the Windsor Building looked like after the Madrid Firefighters let itself burn out and extinguished the flames.
Note how the entire Steel Framed structure is completely intact except for the partially collapsed upper ten floors. This is how all three World Trade Center Buildings, should have looked like, if the fires would have consumed them. Yet all 3 WTC Complex buildings collapsed on their imprints from fires that weren't even half as bad, things that make you go Hmmm!
You Make The Call
Architects for 9/11, Judy Wood, Rebekah Roth and many other writers, researchers and scientist the world over have published reports, articles and even books that support the theory that World Trade Center building 7 was destroyed using a controlled demolition scenario, it really is the only logical and plausible answer.
If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, there is probably a pretty good chance it is a duck.
The astounding fact for me even after fifteen years is that 43% of Americans have never heard of WTC Building 7. A former friend of mine is in such a state of denial that he refuses to even acknowledge the building ever existed.
My thinking is that most people do not want to revisit this tragic event or look into the obvious and clear facts that show the entire episode could not have happened the way our Government said it did because it would shatter their happy blissful ignorance and completely destroy their world view or paradigm. Many, many very intelligent emotionally stable people prefer to remain in complete ignorance, not just about 9/11 but UFOs, Aliens, our false history, war, vaccines, Healthcare or Wealth care as I call it and many other aspects of our world.
The official version of the collapse of WTC Building 7 is fire, that weakened the structural integrity of its steel frame to the point it could no longer hold its own weight. However the magazine Popular Mechanics has tried to create the theory that falling debris from the Twin Towers gouged out a huge section of its frame and caused the collapse. For this to be true it would have crumpled and fallen at and angle not straight down at free fall speed.
Fires can be seen on the third and fourth floors of the building however they could not have possible gotten hot enough to melt steel and certainly not hot enough to collapse the entire building at free fall speed. In Dr. Steven E. Jones peer reviewed paper entitled Revisiting 9/11/2001 - -Applying the Scientific Method, him and his colleagues have this to say in the introduction.
"In fact my colleagues and I now feel that we have sufficient data to conclude that the collisions of jets with the two Towers are NOT sufficient to explain the complete and rapid collapses of both Towers and WTC 7. We conclude that the evidence is compelling that the destruction of the WTC buildings involved planted cutter charges (such as explosives and incendiaries). We will consider this evidence."
The article much like the book by Judy Woods Where Did The Towers Go?, is extremely detailed and exacting but can also be understood in laymen's terms as well. The important thing to remember about World Trade Center 7 is that it fell on its imprint in under 7 seconds, straight down.
The only U.S. Government Agency to ever investigate the collapse of WTC 7 was the Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT) and made this statement in a report issued just days before all the steel from WTC 7 was hauled away and recycled.
"The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue."
Removing evidence from the crime scene, before a complete investigation is completed is a Federal Offense, punishable by lengthy jail time. However to this day not one person has ever been indicted for this crime.
Larry Silverstein Admits Collusion
If you have read my article 9/11 Truth According To Me, you will already know that I don't think any commercial airliners were used in the Crime of the Century however since WTC Building 7 clearly wasn't hit by an airplane the reasons behind its destruction remain a mystery but not to this writer. Clearly in this article World Trade Center 7, The Facts and the Disinformation, I have shown that it is highly dubious that small office fires were the reason for its entire collapse.
So let's review what we have learned and draw some conclusions from this information.
- Larry Silverstein becomes the first private owner of WTC 7 in July of 2001 and acquires a massive insurance policy ($8 BILLION DOLLARS) that includes the specific clause that in case of a terrorist attack he will be able to collect the full amount and be released from his 99 year lease.
- In the evening of September 11, 2001, at 5:20 p.m., almost six hours after the collapse of the Twin Towers, World Trade Center Building 7 collapses in 6.5 seconds at free fall speed, neatly on its imprint much like a controlled demolition.
- The BBC is the only Television News Station in the World to show this event and reported it had already collapsed, even though during its live broadcast it can be clearly seen in the background. Minutes later while still broadcasting it collapses behind the TV commentator, OOOPS!
- WTC 7 is the first Steel Framed building to EVER collapse in the entire history of the World due to fire!
- WTC Building 7 was NEVER mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report and it took the United States Government SEVEN YEARS to issue a report as to the reasons for its collapse, small office fires.
- According to a Zogby poll in 2006, almost 50% of Americans in the poll had never even heard of Building 7.
- WTC 7 was the headquarters for the New York Office of Emergency Management, that documented the entire 9/11 Event as it happened and the Security and Exchange Commission which held all the records for the huge Wall Street Insider Trading trials. All of these records were completely destroyed and the subsequent trials dropped due to lack of evidence.
- All of the evidence was hauled off and either recycled or destroyed overseas before a complete investigation could be conducted by any private or Governmental Agency.
World Trade Center Building 7 is really the smoking gun for this Crime of the Century, because it clearly reveals had many different U.S. Agencies colluded to censor information about this event from the American people.
From the Mainstream Media to FEMA, The White House and even the 9/11 Commission Report, thousands of people have successfully censored this event from almost half of America to this day.
Clearly the collapse of WTC 7 was a criminal act designed to destroy evidence and collect on a huge insurance policy, whom were all the players, we may never know but it is obvious to this writer the building did not collapse due to a few small office fires.
Speculating about how this building collapsed is pointless now that all the evidence has been removed however I wrote this article World Trade Center 7, The Facts and the Disinformation, merely to make more people aware that 9/11 was our wake up call!
Consider how many people truly recognized because of this event how much deception was involved in our world and it will help you too understand why this event may have been the catalyst that changed our world for ever,
© 2016 somethgblue
Brad on August 12, 2018:
I totally agree with this article and I thought the same when it happened.
It has nothing to do with who, or conspiracy.
The questions are objective.
In the history of iron skyscrapers these are the only 3 that have not only collapsed from "fire", but did it in a manner only duplicated by a controlled demolition.
WTC 7 has to be the artificial anomaly for these collapsed buildings.
In fact, instead of getting no attention whatsoever, this building of the 3 should have received the most attention.
This building collapse should have been investigated if nothing else to see if there are flaws in the iron skyscraper that could be systemic to the tens of thousands like them around the world. Isn't that why we investigate plane crashes?
WTC 7 should be looked at from the safety of skyscrapers, and to see if the methods of controlling fires within the building is adequate, functional, and what safety features are needed in future buildings. The same is true of the elevators and stairwells. This would be needed even without an event happening like 911.
Since 911 we have seen the building of very tall skyscrapers around Central Park. Are they any safer now after 911?
Then if we add the differences from 911, we see the building didn't come down in pieces, they were disintegrated. And as a safety issue, the people that were exposed to this during 911 need to know what they should be treated for instead of just dying years later with some disease?
Back to WTC 7, the 911 commission was poorly staffed, underfunded, and did little to no forensic testing. And instead of omitting WTC 7 from their report, the report should have been on WTC 7 because that is the big mystery.
Why would we have the steel from the buildings be sold to China and be gone so quickly. That is evidence that would be useful to use even without a conspiracy. It could help build better constructed skyscrapers.
Another anomaly is the Pentagon as a target. This would be the least useful target, just because it is low and its shape is spread out. The White House, the CIA building, the Capital building would have produced more damage and been a higher grade target.
Yet, 911 came and went without any of its mysteries being noticed by the public.
somethgblue (author) from Shelbyville, Tennessee on November 27, 2016:
Yes, we should be forced to watch mainstream TV conditioning because, everything on TV is true.
In 2003, The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that ALL Television News stations were entertainment shows and could broadcast the news any way they saw fit, meaning (for those of you incapable of thinking for themselves), they could lie to the public legally.
Oh, By The Way, not one Television News Station carried that story and showed it to their TV audience, not just on the day of the ruling EVER, Not one time in the last 13 years has any TV station ever told the public about this ruling . . . gee Dikranovich, why do you think that is?
Could it be because they MAKE UP THE NEWS?
Could it be because they lie to the public everyday?
Dikranovich on November 27, 2016:
I guess the fact that Islamic extremist tried to blow up the world trade centers in 1993 means nothing to you guys, or that the perpetrator of that event was the nephew of Khalid shek Muhammad. Or the little doozy that building 7 collapsed from the roof down and of course was hit with massive debris falling from the north tower. Anyone that describes the fires in building 7 as little office fires, is not steeped in reality. All truthers should be forced to watch CBS west side hwy video of the collapse of building7.
MIchael A. O. Ibiam on November 03, 2016:
There are photos of a corner of WTC7 having 20 missing floors with smoke bellowing out of them. However, I find it odd that the building collapsed as if it was Pruitt-Igoe being demolished. There's also conclusive evidence of thermite chips within dust carried by smoke and wind throughout New York on the day of the attack. Also, you forgot to mention how federal agents kept people within the South Tower after the initial impact of the first plane, and how Silverstein was to have breakfast at Windows On The World that morning, but showed up late to work and phoned his daughter to skip out aswell.
Tope on September 18, 2016:
I couldn't imagine that a right thinking individual could destroy innocent lives for monetary benefits. I did believe that Osama bin Ladin was the brain behind 9/11 until last month some people corrected this erroneous belief on a social media.What about the image of the Muslims that was tarnished as a result of the incidence,innocent people who lost their lives and who will bring Larry Silverstein to book.Anyway,thanks a lot for sharing this information.
Tope on September 18, 2016:
I could not imagine that a mortal could destroy lives of innocent people for earthly benefits.Osama bin Ladin was believed to be the brain behind this massive destruction of life
somethgblue (author) from Shelbyville, Tennessee on July 26, 2016:
I don't think our own government had anything do with the tragedy of 9/11 and if you read the article you would know that.
Clearly the Moussad and agents within the Shadow Government, that really runs this planet, are the criminals behind this False Flag incident.
While the internet is one viable option for collecting relevant data, there hundreds of published documents supporting this contention, of which I own and have read.
Censorship is alive and well however if you are really interested in the truth, it exists in published form.
Setank Setunk on July 25, 2016:
An amateur collection of conspiracy data harvested from the Internet. If you believe our own government would slaughter its' citizens for some dark political agenda then you should move to another country.
somethgblue (author) from Shelbyville, Tennessee on June 11, 2016:
Of course, I think the truth will come out sooner or later but he might be dead by then.
Susette Horspool from Pasadena CA on June 11, 2016:
Do you remember how Bush Jr. had petitioned Congress right after taking over the Presidency to have his fathers CIA records excused from the Freedom of Information Act? Congress refused. Then we didn't hear anything more, but those records have not been released either. Why?
The New York CIA headquarters was in building WTC7. I saw a photograph taken that day of CIA agents searching the ground for any stray documents. I think Bush Sr.'s records were placed in that building and destroyed along with everything else the government didn't want the public to know.
somethgblue (author) from Shelbyville, Tennessee on April 30, 2016:
For many people 9/11 was the catalyst for waking them up to the mass deception on this planet because it helped them to realize how the MSM has been duplicitous in reporting and hyping false flag events.
I knew when the first tower fell straight down on its imprint, that it was BS and even told my sister in a crowded bookstore two years later that I didn't think any airplanes were used.
You could've heard a pin drop, people were looking at me like I was from the planet Krypton . . . but no one turned away as I explained myself.
What made me laugh about the incident is my sister said . . . "But what happened to all the people on the planes?" Think about the logic of that statement, that is how conditioned people's thinking is . . . if there are no planes, there are no people on them, hello?
Anyway, no plane hit the Pentagon that is obvious but to this day millions think one did.
Marc Hubs from United Kingdom on April 30, 2016:
You know, a friend said to me the other night "some people think that 911 was an inside job now don't they?" He's not very knowledgeable about this kind of thing so I didn't really know what to say without insulting him so I just pointed out that it's always seemed that way to me. I was amazed that he's only just heard now after 15 years. I think that shows how even the most conditioned of us are slowly starting to become aware.
somethgblue (author) from Shelbyville, Tennessee on April 29, 2016:
Thanks for reading and commenting Sparkster as always, I respect your opinion. It is truly amazing to me after 15 years the majority of people I work with have never heard of building 7, kind of sad in a way . . . !
Marc Hubs from United Kingdom on April 29, 2016:
Excellent article, you've absolutely nailed this with accuracy in my opinion. All of this is spot on, as I believe it to be. Of course, we had many many warnings well before this event happened, even my own brother had warnings sent to his email address which resulted in him having his computer seized by the police - investigations came back inconclusive... and, of course, still nothing was done to prevent it.