SClemmons is a retired emergency management director, a paramedic, and a published author. He continues to write about true crime.
The following article falls under the Copyright Disclaimer, Section 107 of The Copyright Act of 1976. Allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
Darlie Routier's murder conviction has been debated in depth since the day she was found guilty 25 years ago. There have been numerous documentaries, a made for TV movie, countless websites and blogs, and several books written about the case. As recently as June, 2018 a multi-part ABC documentary: "The Last Defense" aired discussing the Routier case.
Although closely followed in the State of Texas, the trial didn't have the same level of nation-wide fascination as the OJ Simpson, Casey Anthony, and Jodi Arias trials did. Cameras weren't as frequently allowed in courtrooms in 1996 and Turner Broadcasting's Headline News (HLN) and Court TV didn't exist to broadcast each day of the trial into every home. If the Darlie Routier case had occurred in more recent years, it would have been a household name.
Since her conviction, Darlie Routier's attorneys have filed several pleas and appeals to the Texas courts. The last known appeal for re-examination of physical evidence was filed by her current and longtime appellate attorney, Stephen Cooper, and accepted by State District Judge Gracie Lewis in 2014 requesting updated forensic DNA testing of evidence found at the crime scene. Stephen Cooper's intent was to prove through DNA test results that an outside intruder was in fact in the house, committed the heinous murders of Darlie and Darin Routier's two sons, and attacked Darlie before fleeing the scene.
Numerous items from the crime scene were submitted. The majority of the items were samples from the nightshirt Darlie wore on the night of the murders, but other samples included fingerprints on a knife blade handle, (The murder weapon) a swab from the sweatband of a cap, 2 buccal (saliva) swabs from Darlie, and a sample from a sock found outside of the house containing blood stains belonging to both of her boys. The evidence was submitted to the UNT Health Science Center, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics in Fort Worth, Texas, for DNA testing.
The test results were returned to Judge Lewis in June of 2015. The testing conducted on the knife handle, the sweatband of the cap, and the sock turned out to be inconclusive due to their poor condition. However, the test results on the nightshirt samples revealed more than Darlie Routier's attorney had bargained for.
The nightshirt samples submitted, revealed: (In summary)
" A female partial DNA profile was obtained from 10-2589-502. Darlie Routier cannot be excluded as the contributor of the DNA from 10-2589-502. The DNA profile from 10-2589-502 has an estimated frequency of occurrence of 1 in approximately 150 quintillion Caucasian individuals. To a reasonable degree of scientific certainty (Assuming no identical twin) Darlie Routier is the source of the DNA from 10-2589-502. No Y-STR results were obtained from 10-2589-502."
A copy of the 2015 DNA test results can be found here: https://youcouldbewrong.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/dr-06262015103716.pdf
The nightshirt blood samples that were submitted with the hopes of finding male DNA only revealed Darlie's DNA as the prosecution originally claimed during the trial. These new test results utilizing new and improved technology as opposed to 1996 technology, just all the more confirmed Darlie Routier's guilt. DNA technology has advanced significantly since the night of the murders, and readings can be gleaned even from the trace oils on human skin. On this last DNA study, the results once again pointed solely to Darlie Routier. These results are not posted or even mentioned on the "fordarlie.org" website, overseen by Darlie's mother, Darlie Kee.
SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION
This is a highly debated case and it's important for the reader to understand that these debates are not about someone awaiting trial, Darlie Routier has already had her day in court. She was convicted by a jury of her peers and was sentenced to death by lethal injection. Was the trial perfect and free of errors? Of course not, no trial is or ever will be.
People that believe in Darlie Routier's innocence provide all kinds of reasons and theories that they often try to pass as fact as to how she couldn't have been the killer and/or how she deserves a retrial. Their favorite claim is that she didn't have a motive, they love to say a motive was never proven. Prosecutors don't need to have a motive to prove someone committed murder, they only have to prove the accused did it. Which in this case, they did.
Claims are frequently made such as botched evidence testing, contamination of the crime scene, manipulated evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, evidence suppression, witness tampering, jury tampering, perjury; you name it, it's been thrown out there. But when asked to support these claims with provable fact, the Darlie supporters just can't do it. Their "facts" consist of hearsay and theory which would not hold up and obviously didn't hold up in a court of law.
There's a large group of amateur armchair detectives that sit at home in front of their computer screens watching YouTube video's critiquing the techniques utilized by the evidence investigators and lab technicians at the Routier crime scene. These are individuals that are not trained forensic investigators and had no part in processing that particular crime scene. They're hardly qualified to criticize the certified professionals that were actually there doing their jobs. These denunciator's are simply repeating things they've read on an Internet Darlie support site or saw on a YouTube video which prompts them to say "Oh, the police botched up that crime scene." People ALWAYS say the system failed when a trial verdict doesn't go the way they wanted it to.
When people don't agree with a verdict where circumstantial evidence convicted the defendant, blame always goes directly to the police and the investigators; even when the local police detectives decided that it would be a good idea to bring in outside investigators for a second opinion including experienced FBI personnel and a crime scene investigator with 39 years of experience.
Much of the debate is based on incorrect and inaccurate information, in some cases even outright made-up information is passed as fact. Although this Hub contains some open questions and opinions, it's based on the trial transcripts, media interviews, police reports, DNA test results, defendant statements, physical forensic evidence found at the scene, Darlie Routier's own courtroom testimony, and her written statement to police 2 days after the murders. The trial transcripts were found to contain numerous errors and have been corrected utilizing audio tapes of the trial. Many Darlie supporters feel that the transcript errors alone warrant a retrial. Obviously, if a retrial were somehow granted it still wouldn't change the forensic evidence that convicted her.
Darlie and her family of course maintain her innocence, but what family says their loved one convicted of crime is guilty? Many Darlie supporters point out that it's been 25 years and she still claims her innocence. Of course she does, she has to. She's committed to that claim at this point, she's on death row; the very moment she admitted guilt her appeals process would come to a grinding halt and a date for execution would be scheduled immediately.
Most new-generation Darlie supporters admit they haven't read the trial transcripts. A guilty or innocent opinion cannot be accurately formed based on watching YouTube videos or simply reading a book; which are inevitably someone else's opinion. With the unique complicity of the Darlie Routier case, people who say she's innocent as well as people who say she's guilty are truly not qualified to offer an opinion until they know all the facts of the case. Due to most published literature referencing the Darlie Routier case being a one-sided opinion (the author either believes in her innocence or her guilt) the closest one can come to achieving unbiased information about the case and proceedings would result from reading the court transcripts in their entirety.
Unfortunately, many if not most newcomers to the Darlie Routier case are immediately fed propaganda and manipulated facts of the case due to the large number of Darlie supporter blogs and websites. There aren't many internet sites supporting her guilty verdict because most people feel that justice was duly served and have moved on; it's old news. Darlie support sites as well as some authors that believe in her innocence are notorious for engaging in a journalistic tactic known as "cherry picking." Cherry picking is where the author selectively pulls tidbits of information about a subject that affirms their position or the point they're trying to get across. In doing this they neglect to provide all of the data or information about their position that might countermand what they've written. It's not outright lying per se, it's more like just not providing all the information in its entirety. Most if not all of the Darlie support sites are good at using the cherry picking tactic when extracting testimonial quotes from the Darlie Routier case court transcripts. They'll quote a question and answer from witness testimony that relates to their point, but won't print all that followed in that testimony during a prosecutorial line of questioning. This is one method of manipulating the reader and their beliefs, also referred to as "quote mining.". Politicians are famous for cherry picking during campaign debates. The problem with the cherry picking tactic is that it directly suppresses evidence or additional information that could lead to a more complete picture; which of course is the intent of the author.
A very large number of people who blurt out their opinions on this case haven't actually conducted any independent research themselves. They prefer to absorb information in a "pre-digested" form by reading and quoting the work of others.
THE 911 CALL
* NOTE - It's important to point out here that the 911 call lasted 5 minutes and 31 seconds and the transcript of the call contains 166 individual sentences over that time frame. 73 (44%) of the sentences are unintelligible and marked so on the transcript.
This is mentioned here because some Darlie supporters use the 911 call in attempts to discredit the testimony of the first arriving Rowlette police officer, David Waddell. They say he lied in court about parts of a conversation between himself and Darlie based on not hearing those words on the 911 call.
Darlie Routier was on a land line with 911, Officer Waddell was all over the house looking for an intruder and surveying the crime scene. That conversation is not going to be picked up in it's entirety or intelligibly over the phone unless Waddell was standing right next to Darlie the entire time she was holding the phone, which of course he wasn't.
On June 6, 1996, at 2:31 am, the emergency communications center (911) in Rowlett, Texas received a call from a private residence in the upscale Dalrock Heights subdivision owned by 28 year old Darin Routier and his 26 year old wife, Darlie. The caller, Darlie Routier, frantically told police dispatcher Doris Trammell that her home had been broken into and that an intruder had stabbed two of her sons, 6 year old Devon and 5 year old Damon. She claimed she had been attacked as well.
Within three minutes of the 911 call, Rowlett Police Officer David Waddell, was the first to arrive at the Routier home. He had been sitting in his police cruiser in a church parking lot doing paperwork just a few blocks away. Upon arrival he observed Darin Routier coming out of the front door wearing only pants with no shirt or shoes. Officer Waddell, not knowing if this was the suspect, drew his weapon and told him to stop. Darin identified himself and told the officer that his kids and been stabbed and were dying. He told Officer Waddell that a nurse lived across the street and he was going to get her.
When Waddell entered the house, he was shocked at the site before his eyes as he surveyed the scene. Two young boys lay on the family room floor covered in their own blood with obvious deep penetrating stab wounds to their chests and backs. There was blood everywhere; around them seeping into the carpet, on the walls and all over the kitchen floor. Officer Waddell stated that one of the boys (Devon) was obviously dead, and the other boy (Damon) was close to the wall near the hallway doing what he called "a slow craw" and making gurgling sounds as he tried to breathe.
The mother, Darlie, clutched a wet bloody towel to her neck and was standing near him on the phone. She began screaming at Officer Waddell that the intruder might still be in the house and that he ran out through the garage. Waddell instructed Darlie to get a towel and put pressure on the boy's wounds. Which, it should be pointed out here, she didn't do. He told her 4 separate times to put pressure on Damon's wounds and she never did it. With his weapon in hand, he entered the utility room and peered into the darkness of the garage. He stated in his testimony that both his training and his instinct told him it was best to wait for backup before actually entering the dark garage alone. Seconds later, Rowlett police Sergeant Matthew Walling arrived on the scene along with a Rowlett Fire Rescue ambulance staffed by paramedics Jack Kolbye and Brian Koschak.
The paramedics "staged" or waited outside the front door waiting for the officers to secure the scene and tell them it was safe to enter. Officer's Walling and Waddell drew their weapons and began searching the house starting in the utility room adjacent to the kitchen which led to the garage where Darlie said she had chased the intruder out of the house. Being dark, the officers switched on flashlights, found the light switch, but didn't find anyone in the garage or spot anyone in the back yard. They did observe an open window in the garage close to the floor with a vertical cut to the screen.
A short time later Officer Walling opened the front door and told paramedics Kolbye and Koschak to come in and advised they were going to need additional medical help. Paramedic Koschak radioed for an additional ambulance as he followed his partner into the house.
Paramedic Kolbye went to Damon located to the left of the entry hallway in the family room close to a wall and paramedic Koschak went to Devon on the other side of the room at the foot of the couch. Kolbye testified that Damon was face down and took his last breath as he turned him over. He began trying to ventilate Damon with a bag valve mask but he stated that Darin and Darlie were both shouting which was distracting so he picked Damon up and carried him outside to a stretcher and began CPR. Koschak testified that after assessing Devon and noticing that he was obviously dead, he went over to Darlie in the kitchen to look at her neck. He also wanted to get her away from the shouting so he took her out on the front porch to assess her wounds. Both medics’ were asked in court if Darlie was visibly upset and crying in the house and they both said she wasn't crying but there was a lot of shouting going on. Paramedic Larry Byford, who examined her in the ambulance on the way to the hospital, testified that during the entire trip she didn’t ask once about the condition of her children.
THE CRIME SCENE
Officers Waddell and Walling searched the upstairs areas of the house and discovered Darin and Darlie's youngest son, 6-month old Drake, in his crib. Fortunately he had not been harmed. No intruder was discovered upstairs or anywhere else in the home.
In the meantime, K-9 officers had arrived on the scene and began searching a wide perimeter around the house; no intruder found.
Paramedic Kolbye stated that when they loaded Damon in the ambulance he was just barely hanging on and gasping for air in his blood filled lungs. They proceeded transporting to Baylor Medical Center, Dallas, but he died enroute. Paramedic Koschak remained at the scene and when the second RFD paramedic team, Larry Byford, Rick Zimmerman, and Rick Coleman arrived, he turned over Darlie's care to them. Rowlett Police asked Koschak to examine the baby (Drake) and Darin who was also unharmed.
While paramedics were tending to Darlie's lacerations, (Not stabs like the boys) she told Sergeant Walling that an intruder had entered her house, and had gotten on top of her while she slept on the couch. Darlie's well known story changing habits began right here at this point and would continue to present day. She originally told Officer Waddell that the intruder awakened her, she screamed, and after fighting with him at the end of the bar, (Located between the kitchen and the family room) he ran on through the kitchen, through the utility room, and into the garage area. She said it was then that she realized the boys had been attacked and savagely butchered. Approximately fifteen minutes later, Darlie told Sergeant Walling that the fight between her and the intruder occurred while she was still on the couch. Both officers testified to these different stories during the trial.
Prosecution: And when she told you that she had a struggle with the individual, did she indicate to you that morning where that struggle had taken place?
Sergeant Walling: Yes, sir, at the couch.
Prosecution: At the couch?
Sergeant Walling: Yes, sir.
Prosecution: Are you sure that she didn't tell you that the struggle occurred between the kitchen and the family room?
Sergeant Walling: No, sir. She said that when she woke up, the person was standing over her, and that she was laying on the couch, and that she began struggling with him
It was now 3 am and the paramedics were preparing to transport Darlie. Her husband, Darin, told her he would meet her at the hospital. Darin told a next door neighbor he was shook up and asked him if would drive him to the hospital. The neighbor's wife volunteered to remain at the house and stay with baby Drake. Evidence investigators and technicians now began arriving along with local media trucks. Neighbors had begun to gather outside of the crime scene tape.
RED FLAGS AND SUSPICIONS
In this author's opinion, the first red flag would have to be the fact that not once did Darlie ask about her youngest child Drake, or go upstairs to check on him. Her two oldest boys are laying on the floor in their own blood stabbed to death and she never asked anyone about her baby upstairs? There's something seriously wrong with that picture. We know she didn't ask about him (or check on him) from the time she called 911 to when she was admitted to the hospital, unless she asked the paramedics enroute to the hospital (which neither mentioned in court) or Darin told her Drake was fine before she dialed 911; again, not mentioned anywhere.
Even if Darin told her Drake was fine before she dialed 911, what mother wouldn't rush upstairs to see for herself that her baby was ok? Especially with the possibility of the supposed intruder still being in the house. What mother in the world would leave their baby all alone upstairs in that situation? ....Unless she already knew Drake was fine because there was no intruder.
Darlie told investigators that she and the boys had decided to sleep in the family room with the boys on the floor and her on the couch watching TV (As later discovered she had done for several nights before the murders) while Darin and baby Drake slept upstairs in the bedroom. She said Drake's tossing and turning in his crib upstairs kept her awake. The family room was the scene of the crime. This is where the boys were viciously stabbed and Darlie claimed she was attacked by an intruder while sleeping on the couch.
Lieutenant Grant Jack, commander of the Rowlett Police Department's Investigative Division, was summoned at home and arrived on the scene around 3 AM. He was briefed by detective Jimmy Patterson at the house as to what Darlie had stated and began conducting his own assessment of the scene. As the crime scene was being "processed," Rowlett PD evidence specialist, Sergeant David Nabors, began dusting for prints and examining blood evidence as other technicians were taking photos all over the house. After realizing the magnitude of the crime, Lt. Jack thought it best to call for some investigative assistance. He called in James Cron, a retired veteran Dallas PD crime scene investigator with an excellent career track record. Cron was now doing consulting work for other law enforcement agencies in the Dallas area. After being notified he arrived at about 6AM and began his analysis of the scene. While gathering evidence in the kitchen, Sgt. Nabors noticed Darlie's purse and the many gold rings and bracelets (Including a Rolex watch) she had worn that day sitting on the kitchen counter where she had taken them off before lying down on the couch. He thought it was odd that an intruder that presumably came in to rob the house would walk right past the purse and jewelry without taking it all.
Nabors also noticed that with all the blood on the counter and kitchen floor that the sink was perfectly clean and the cabinet doors under the sink were clean as well with the exception of blood smudges around the edges. It gave the appearance that someone had tried to wipe the counter and cabinet doors clean of blood. Nabor's sprayed Luminol, a chemical compound that picks up the copper found in blood which often remains behind after attempts are made of cleaning it up. The Luminol indicated there had been a significant amount of blood there which had been obviously wiped up.
James Cron found it odd that other than a blood smudge on the door leading to the utility room and two blood smudges on the side of the washing machine, there was nothing else past that point to indicate that an intruder had exited through the garage as Darlie had claimed; not one drop of blood anywhere. The cut screen on the garage window was just that, cut. It wasn't bent in or out or stretched in any way to indicate someone had gone through it in either direction. The dust on the window sill was undisturbed, there was no blood or fingerprints found on the window or the screen, and the ground outside the window had no bloody footprints or footprints of any kind. There was absolutely nothing to indicate anyone had gone into the garage and through the window; coming in or going out.
The investigators discovered a motion sensor light on the redwood spa the Routier's had installed in the backyard. Tests revealed that it would stay on for 18 minutes after it was activated. If Darlie's "timeline of events" was accurate according to her 911 call and what she first told police, that light would have still been on when officers Waddle and Walling arrived on the scene in 3 minutes and 4 minutes after the 911 call. Both officers testified that it was not on when they initially checked the garage and backyard. Darlie repeatedly stated that the intruder exited the house through the garage and went out the window.
A significant amount of blood was found on the kitchen floor in front of the sink. The only footprints found were Darlie's bare footprints and a partial boot-print found to be consistent with Sergeant Walling's boots from where he first checked the garage. There was broken glass on the kitchen floor from a wine glass, but the glass was on top of the blood, there were no blood drops discovered on top of the shards of glass suggesting that it had been broken after the events that had supposedly taken place. Examination of Darlie's feet (she was barefooted) revealed no cuts from the glass. A vacuum cleaner was found turned over but with blood underneath it as if deliberately placed there after the fact. An intact expensive flower vase was found lying on the floor with long stem flowers. The stems were unbroken giving the investigators the impression that they had just been laid there, not knocked over during a struggle. One investigator later commented "Strange....maximum human devastation with minimal property damage."
Cron quietly approached Lt Jack outside in front of the house and told him that from what he was seeing so far, it was starting to look like these murders had been committed by someone living in the house. Lt. Jack told Cron that he had the same gut feeling after he heard Darlie's account of what happened and compared it to the scene. As the investigation proceeded it was beginning to appear as if the scene of the crime had been staged to give the impression that a struggle had taken place between Darlie and an intruder. None of the forensic evidence was matching Darlie's initial story. Cron told Lt. Jack that if a struggle had taken place, it was minimal and if an intruder had been there, he couldn't find any evidence of his presence in the house. He said there was no visible evidence to suggest that someone had exited through the garage as Darlie had stated.
Author Note - Out of due respect for the victims and family, no photos of the boy's body's will be displayed here.
THE BLOOD EVIDENCE
Darlie Routier was again interviewed the day after the murders in the hospital, this time by detectives. Her story was now more detailed and changed a bit from her original story.
"I woke up hearing my son Damon saying 'Mommy Mommy,' as he tugged on my nightshirt. I opened my eyes and felt a man get off me. I got up to chase after him. As I flipped the light in the kitchen on, I saw him open his hand and let the knife drop to the floor. Then he ran out through the garage. I went over and picked up the knife. I shouldn't have picked it up. I probably covered up the fingerprints. I shouldn't have picked it up. I looked over and saw my two babies with blood all over them. I didn't realize my own throat had been cut until I saw myself in a mirror. I screamed out to my husband."
The Luminol application to the kitchen area showed that a significant amount of blood had been rinsed down the drain most likely with the sprayer. It showed wiped up blood from the counter, the cabinet doors, and on the sides of the sink. There also appeared to be wiped up blood smears on the water faucet and the sprayer as well. Blood discovered on the inside of the cabinet doors where it had run down from the sink proved to be Darlie’s. Blood found on the sink back splash turned out to be a combination of both Damon and Devon's blood.
Darlie denied cleaning or even being anywhere near the kitchen sink, despite her blood being everywhere around it and in front of it. (Until she testified in court, yep, her story changed again) That would insinuate that the supposed intruder stopped to wash his hands, clean up the sink, the counter, the outside of the cabinet doors, the sprayer, the back splash, and wipe up two of Darlie's foot prints from the floor all while being chased by Darlie. And if so, how did he accomplish that without leaving a single bloody footprint on the floor in front of the sink that had Darlie's blood everywhere? That idea is so preposterous it's not worth considering. More on the sink will be addressed later in this article.
Investigators discovered blood drops on top of blood drops on the small carpet immediately in front of the sink indicating that someone that was bleeding had stood there for some time. (Identified as belonging to Darlie) And as mentioned, Luminol applied to the kitchen floor showed that someone had attempted to clean up Darlie's bloody footprints facing the sink.
As Darlie's accounts of what happened continued to change in the days following the murders, she now said that she fought the intruder on the couch who was a male, about 6 feet tall, wearing a black t-shirt ball cap and blue jeans that was holding a large knife while still on top of her. With the various cuts that Darlie presented upon arrival of the police, only a small amount of blood was found on the couch or the pillows where Darlie's second version of what happened claims the knife fight took place.
There were no stab marks, punctures, slashes or cast off blood of any kind discovered on the couch where Darlie claimed the knife attack took place. This "revised" version came just minutes after her first story changed from fighting the intruder just inside the kitchen area just before the intruder ran into the garage.
A bloody hand print of Damon's was found on the carpet where he was first stabbed and a second hand print was found on the couch (which had initially been wiped off-discovered with Luminol testing) showing that he had moved. A trail of his blood discovered on the carpet indicated that he moved a second time toward the entry way where he was found when emergency services arrived. Blood spatter found on the wall suggested that he had been stabbed a second time by someone who was bleeding. Tests on blood drops near Damon's body were identified as Darlie’s.
A blood imprint of the knife on the carpet was found near Devon’s body. A small pool of blood indicated that someone bleeding, most likely from the hand or arm had been there. Blood found pooling at the tip of the knife indicated that blood had run down the knife from the handle. This blood turned out be a combination of Damon's and Darlie's blood. Darlie had a laceration on the top of her right arm and she is right handed. Darlie told police she saw the intruder drop the knife in the utility room, she picked it up and placed it on the kitchen island. She never said she carried into the living room where it had obviously been laid down next to Damon's body.
Damon and moved some distance from where he was initially stabbed. His body was found near the wall almost directly in front of the bathroom. It appeared that he was trying his best to make it out of the family room and move toward the stairs. Maybe to get away from Darlie?
DARLIE'S MYSTERIOUS WOUNDS and BRUISES
Interestingly, of the cuts Darlie had on her, the two areas she was most proud of, her face and her breasts, were uninjured.
Darlie has said more than once in post-conviction interviews from prison "How could I have done those things to myself? My neck was cut from ear to ear."
Hardly, the 3 and a half inch laceration (9 cm) on her neck was defined by two physician's (one a surgeon) as superficial. It was not life threatening as Darlie supporters and many documentaries (Including the recent June 2018 ABC feature: The Last Defense) would have you believe. Yes, one end of the cut was close to a carotid artery, but the carotid arteries are also very close to the surface. Her laceration did not penetrate muscle and was less than a half of an inch deep. Darlie has stated that she had to go to surgery to have her necklace removed that was embedded in her neck from the knife blade. That is 100% false. The surgeon, erring on the side of caution decided to do a small exploratory procedure to evaluate the laceration.
Here is a perfect example of inaccurate, or most likely intentionally made-up information about the necklace and surgery direct from the Darlie support site "fordarlieroutier.org." In reference to the necklace the website dramatically states:
"She was in surgery for 2 hours, the necklace was removed by doctors from her neck wound."
The truth is, when nurse Jodi Fitts removed the bandage applied by EMS in the ambulance, the necklace fell right off of her neck, prior to any surgery. The website says "doctors" as if a whole team of surgeons were meticulously working on her in a race against the clock to save her life. There was one physician, Dr. Santos conducting the procedure accompanied by a resident (doctor in training) who was observing. The website goes on to say that she was in surgery for "2 hours." According to her medical chart, the cleansing, evaluation, and closing procedure took 49 minutes and was considered "an outpatient procedure."
Darlie supporters love to say a "nick" or flattened area in the chain "proves" that it saved her life because it kept the knife blade from lacerating her carotid artery; pure speculation. Darlie bought that necklace at a pawn shop; it was used jewelry. Who's to say that nick wasn't in the chain when she purchased it? It's proof of nothing.
All the surgeon (Dr, Santos) did was take a peek at the cut, cleanse it, and close it right back up. He didn't even use sutures or staples, he used steri-strips. (See pic above) He had her placed in the ICU only to keep the press from hounding her. Dr Santos testified that under any other circumstances he probably would have discharged her later that morning. The press in-turn, (at the family's approval and invitation) jumped at the opportunity of getting photos of Darlie in bed in the ICU. It's standard procedure for any patient in a critical care unit to have an IV, be placed on oxygen, capnography1, a heart monitor, and pulse oximetry2,...no matter how serious the patient's condition is. So now we have these dramatic photos of Darlie in bed with all these wires and tubes and her intentionally displaying a look on her face as if she were on death's doorway. All with a simple procedure that would have under any other circumstance had her discharged from the ER in a couple of hours. The Darlie supporters proudly display these photos on their blogs and websites and say "OMG, look at her, she almost died, she couldn't have possibly done this to herself."
1 - measures end-tidal co2, your exhaled air
2 - measures oxygen saturation at the capillary beds, the little clip they put on your finger with a wire attached to it,
Darlie and her defense counsel claimed that her bruises, all predominately on the underside of her right arm were defensive bruises where she had fought off the intruder. If that's true, what caused the bruises? According to one version of Darlie's 5 different intruder stories, he supposedly had a knife, not a baseball bat. Why were there no slashes or stabs underneath her right arm where she was using it for defense? Why only bruises? Bruises like that don't just come from someone grabbing your arm, they came from striking something. If she were striking out or defending herself with her arms how did she not get cut by the knife? No cuts were found under either one of her arms. Why weren't the palms of her hands or her fingers cut while fighting a man with knife?
Suggested theories as to the causes for the bruises have included the boys kicking with their legs to ward off the stabs. (Especially the right arm holding the knife) Juror Rina Way said on the "Liza Show" that the fact that Devon had a knife wound on his buttocks suggested that he had both legs up in the air kicking Darlie's right arm to ward off the stabs to his chest. The other theory is that Darlie (or with Darin's assistance) created the bruises herself to support her story of fighting the intruder..
A trauma surgeon, an emergency room nurse and four ICU nurses testified during the trial that the bruises under her right arm were definitely not there while Darlie was in their care and up to when she was discharged. As to be expected, the Darlie supporters claim that their testimony was manipulated by the prosecution. This infers that a doctor and four nurses from Baylor University Medical Center were talked into risking their careers and risked receiving jail time by committing perjury on the witness stand. After the trial, juror Charlie Samford publicly stated that if he had seen the photo of her under arm bruise, he would have voted not guilty. The trial transcripts clearly describe Asst. DA Toby Shook instructing the courtroom bailiff to be sure to show the photo of her large underarm (Right arm) bruise to every single juror. Was juror Charlie Samford asleep when this picture was shown to them?
During the trial, Dr. Alejandro Santos, the trauma surgeon that closed Darlie's wounds was called to testify. Asst. DA Toby Shook showed Dr. Santos the infamous bruise photo of Darlie's right arm (Shown below) that her supporters say prove that she fought off an intruder.
Prosecutor: Okay. Now, you never saw any evidence of this injury to the right arm on her stay [in the hospital] on the 6th, 7th or 8th of June; is that right?
Dr. Santos: Other than the other wounds that we talked about earlier, no, I did not see any other type of injury.
Prosecutor: How long would it take for bruising like this to occur to the arm after receiving this blunt force trauma?
Dr. Santos: I'd say 24 to 48 hours
Prosecutor: Would the nurses make notes of that if they saw this type of injury?
Dr. Santos: Yes. That's part of their duties, is to find injuries that we may have missed. And certainly something like this would be something I would expect the nurses to point out to me or to the other doctors before we sent her home.
Even Darlie's friend and neighbor Karen Neal, a trained Registered Nurse, testified that she didn't see the underarm bruise on her right arm while visiting Darlie every day in the hospital. She said the only bruise she observed was around the cut on the top of Darlie's arm. It's interesting how no one saw these mysterious bruise's before June 10th, except of course.....Darlie's family members.
The bruise photos were taken on June 10, - 48 hours after Darlie's discharge from the hospital. That falls right in line with Dr. Santos' expert opinion of bruising occurring within 24-48 hours. June 10th was 48 hours after her discharge. Which is highly suggestive of assisted or self infliction when she got back home from the hospital prior to the police photos.
THINGS JUST DON'T ADD UP
So according to Darlie, an intruder breaks in the house and stab's the sleeping boys with such great force that several of the stab wounds went almost all the way through Devon's chest. All of this vicious action takes place just a few feet from her and she doesn't hear a sound; she continues sleeping. Then with the element of surprise on his side, the intruder attacks her but for some unknown reason he completely changes his attack style by performing slashes, not high force stabs as he did on the children. Why would he just slash at an adult who could fight back better than a child? Why would he not ram that knife down into her chest several times as was done to the two boys and be done with it? It makes no sense that he would only slash her where she could wake up, fight back, scream for help, or even survive and become a witness that could testify against him. And she claimed she slept through her attack too ! The Darlie Supporters say that it was just so traumatic to her that she erased it from her memory and doesn't remember it.
The only blood discovered in the utility room, (Which led to the garage) was found on the edge of the utility room door and in two separate places on the left side of the washing machine; it was identified as belonging to Darlie. No other blood was discovered past that point. The utility room floor, the garage floor, the window sill, the screen, the patio, and the back yard gate showed no blood drops; no fingerprints, and no bloody footprints.
The gate in the back yard had hinge problems. Darin had attempted to temporarily repair the hinges with wire. It was quite difficult to open or close because it dragged the ground. It was found closed and in place when police investigators inspected it.
Kathy Cruz, author of the book, Dateline Purgatory: Examining the Case that Sentenced Darlie Routier to Death, (A book that contends Darlie is innocent) stated: "That sock is the most important piece of evidence in this entire case," It is important, but not the most important. Actually, it was probably more valuable evidence to the prosecution than it was to the defense. A white sock, presumed to have belonged to Darin was found 75 yards away down an alley next to a garbage can. It was on the ground and laid out flat in a conspicuous manner, almost as if the person that placed it there wanted it to be found. It had blood belonging to Damon and Devon on it, and the inside of the sock at the toe end, it had skin cells belonging to Darlie.
The prosecution contended that it was most likely used as a glove to conceal Darlie's fingerprints on the knife as she stabbed the boys. The Darlie supporters maintain that the sock proves Darlie didn't do it because she wouldn't have had time to run it down there and get back to make the 911 call in this so called "time frame." They claim she didn't have the time to put the sock there.
The distance to where the sock was located from the Routier house is 75 yards, that's 450 feet round trip and can be completed walking a fast pace (Not running) in 5 minutes or less. It was 3 houses away. I, the author, did it myself and I walked the distance and timed it. It took me 4 minutes and 51 seconds; and I'm by no means a world class athlete.
This "time frame" as it's called, didn't begin until the moment Darlie dialed 911. She had all the time in the world prior to dialing 911 to stage the scene at the house, stab the boys, and walk the sock down the alley in an attempt to confuse police and draw attention away from herself. This would explain why none of her blood was on the sock and none of her blood was found anywhere along the route to where the sock was found. She could have returned from dropping the sock, stood at the sink and cut herself at which time she realizes that Damon is still alive. (He had scooted himself from the couch to the wall) She stabs Damon a second time depositing her own blood next to him as was discovered, places the knife on the kitchen island, then screams for Darin and calls 911.
The investigators and prosecution considered at one point the possibility that Darin may have ran the sock down to where it was found to make it look like it had been discarded by the intruder as he was running away. (Hence none of Darlie's blood found) This author has not ruled out the strong possibility that after Darin woke up to Darlie's screams and saw what Darlie had done, he decided to help stage the scene (including running the sock down the alley) to keep Darlie from being arrested and charged.
THE TWO KNIVES
There were two knives used in this crime, one used to cut the screen, the other used as a murder weapon. Both of these knives belonged to the Routier's and were kept in a knife block located in the kitchen on a counter top. The defense maintained that the mystery intruder cut the screen in the garage window, and came into the house; even though the screen frame itself was loose and could have easily just been removed. The only problem is that a serrated edged bread knife found in the knife holder on the counter in the Routier kitchen was discovered under analysis to have fiberglass rod fibers and adhesive dust on the blade matching the fibers that comprise the screen. This would mean the intruder mysteriously entered the house, got a knife to cut the screen, went back outside, cut the screen and came in through the window? He was also courteous enough to put the knife back in the block when he came in.
The Darlie Routier defense team and Kathy Cruz, author of Dateline Purgatory: Examining the Case that Sentenced Darlie Routier to Death, have stated that the fibers on the knife could have come from the evidence technician's fingerprint brush.This was proven not be true though microscopic and chemical analysis. The screen fibers were larger than the fingerprint brush fibers and the screen fibers on the knife contained black rubber and asbestos. The fingerprint brush fibers did not contain any asbestos. Darlie Kee, Darlie's mother has stated in later years that the serrated knife couldn't have possibly cut the screen due to its rounded tip. However, that knife successfully cutting a screen was replicated in the crime lab. The knife used to stab the boys was also a knife from the Routier kitchen knife holder.
Darlie mentioned twice to police 911 dispatcher Doris Trammell, twice to officer Waddell and Detective Patterson, and four times to the hospital staff that she wished she hadn't picked the knife up off the floor that she claimed the intruder dropped as she chased him out of the house. It was as if she were trying to establish an alibi as to why her prints and blood would be found on it. Police dispatcher Trammell stated that she thought it was odd that someone who's children had just been murdered would make an obvious point of mentioning how their finger prints got on the murder weapon during the initial 911 call for help.
In one of Darlie's versions of the intruder leaving the house, she claimed that as she was chasing the intruder out of the house, she saw him drop the knife on the floor of the utility room. Forensic testing was conducted on this knife to replicate what Darlie had claimed. The knife was dipped in animal blood and dropped on the utility room floor in the house from waist level while walking, and then again while running exactly as Darlie described the intruder had done. Each time it was reconstructed, a certain amount of blood spatter shot off to the sides of the blade when dropped. No spatter marks or knife imprints were found anywhere on the floor of the utility room. As mentioned previously, a knife imprint was discovered near Devon's body but from the blood marks around it and lack of spatter marks, it appeared to have been laid there rather than dropped there. When police arrived, Darlie showed them where she had placed it on the counter top.
Doug Mulder, Darlie's lead defense attorney was well aware that he was going to have trouble explaining away the knife evidence. After Darlie was sentenced Mulder later stated in an interview, "I always worried about the knife, my biggest problem was that knife."
This is the one piece of physical evidence that convicted her if nothing else did. Along with Darlie's own blood on her nightshirt, analysis revealed what's referred to as "cast off" blood droplets. Meaning the droplets of blood were cast off an object in motion such a knife in a stabbing motion. This action was also successfully duplicated in the lab with a blood spatter expert wearing a white t-shirt using the actual evidence knife and mimicking a stabbing motion with blood on the blade.
Several cast-off stains of Devon’s blood were found on the front and right shoulder of Darlie’s nightshirt. (Remember, she was right handed) In addition, several cast-off stains of Damon’s blood were found on the back of Darlie’s nightshirt, as would be expected if the knife were swung up to the level of her head in a stabbing motion.
Darlie Supporters just love to say that the blood droplets on the nightshirt aren't proof of anything because the shirt was stuffed in a paper bag (which it wasn't) with other items of clothing. These self proclaimed bloodstain "experts" go on to say that being wet any blood on the nightshirt could simply be transfer stain or blood that soaked from part of the shirt to another. Five specific stains on Darlie’s nightshirt were proven not to be from soaking through or transfer. Her shirt was cut off by paramedics enroute to the hospital and laid flat. Two separate stains, labeled by forensics examiners as TB2 and TB3 were found on the upper right front shoulder of the nightshirt and suggestive of cast off. TB3 was a mixture of Devon and Darlie's blood, and TB2 was a mixture of Damon and Darlie's blood. The striking feature of these two particular stains is that they weren't simple drops. The extended length of the blood stains indicated motion of the blood from downward to upward.
Two additional stains were discovered on the left shoulder of the nightshirt shirt labeled LS1 and LS3. LS1 was a mixture of Damon and Darlie's blood, LS3 was a mixture of Devon and Darlie's blood. These stains too were suggestive of cast-off. LS1 had a downward trajectory. LS3 had an upward trajectory.
On the back right shoulder of the night shirt was a sole drop labeled TB8. This blood was identified as belonging to Devon. TB8's stain has a long axis and shows an up and down trajectory. This was very strong evidence suggestive of Darlie raising the knife up after completing a stab, depositing Devon’s blood on the back of her nightshirt, then bringing her arm down to stab again. Of all the stains on Darlie's night shirt, TB8 was crucial evidence that played a major role in incriminating her.
THE ARREST, THE INDICTMENT, AND THE TRIAL
On June 18, 1996, Rowlett Police detectives asked Darlie to come once again to the police station for addition questions. Later that night she was arrested and charged with two counts of capital murder. She was immediately placed in custody at the Lew Starrett Justice Center to await indictment.
That evening Sgt. Dean Poos, Public Information Officer (PIO) for the Rowlett Police Department issued (shown here in part) the following press release:
On the morning of Thursday, June 6th, 1996, an investigation began into the murders of Damon and Devon Routier. A significant event has now occurred in this very intensive investigation, At approximately 10:20p.m. this evening, investigators from the Rowlett Police Department arrested Darlie Routier (white female, age 26). Mrs. Routier has been charged with two counts of Capital Murder stemming from the stabbing deaths of her sons Damon (age 5) and Devon (age 6) This arrest is the result of the most intensive and exhaustive investigation ever conducted by the Rowlett Police Department.
Darlie Routier was booked at the Rowlett City Jail and arraigned by Municipal Court Judge Owen Lokken. Judge Lokken ordered Mrs. Routier held without bond. Mrs. Routier was then transferred to the Lew Sterrett Justice Center. I cannot comment on the details of this investigation other than to say we believe that the white male suspect described by Darlie Routier as the man that attacked her and murdered her children never existed. We also believe that the wounds present on Darlie Routier were self-inflicted. As for the father, Darin Routier, at this point we do not believe that he was involved in, or participated in the murders.
On June 28, Darlie Routier was officially indicted by a Dallas County grand jury on two counts of capital murder. Judge Mark Tolle, who presided at her trial issued a gag order barring the defense, the prosecution, potential witnesses, and Darlie's immediate family from discussing the case with the media. Which Darlie, Darin, and her mother Darlie Kee, all violated. She was ordered held on a 1 million dollar bail.
About 3 weeks later after forensic test results on the evidence came back, the District Attorney's Office announced they would be seeking the death penalty and Judge Tolle rescinded Darlie's bail considering her a flight risk.
Darlie Routier's written statement to Rowlett Police 6-8-1996
The two month long jury selection began on October 16, 1996 in Kerrville, Texas after a change of venue request was granted by Judge Tolle. 165 potential jurors were interviewed by the defense and prosecution. On November 14, the court announced jury selection was complete and it would consist of seven women and five men. Judge Tolle announced that the trial would begin Monday morning at 9:00 AM on January 6, 1997.
The first witness called for the state, Dr. Joanie McLaine from the medical examiner’s office, testified that the defense wounds on Devon’s body indicated that he had struggled with his attacker and the wounds were savage in nature. The first wound penetrated the left chest, the left lung the left pulmonary artery and the pulmonary valve. The second stab penetrated the left center of the chest in a downward motion and entered the liver. The 3rd and 4th and fourth stabs affected the shoulder and leg. She reported other incised lacerations on the body as well.
Dr. Janice Townsend-Parchman testified that Darlie Routier's superficial neck wound could have been self-inflicted and possibly does show hesitation. She didn't definitively say it was or wasn't self inflicted despite Defense attorney Doug Mulder's attempts at getting her to rule out self-infliction on the witness stand. The deep, multiple wounds on the boys, however, showed the attack on them was quick and deliberate and was definitely personal.
The final witness for the prosecution, Special Agent Al Brantley from the FBI’s Center for Analysis of Violent Crime in Quantico, Virginia, testified in his conclusion that he found nothing to indicate the presence of an intruder, the entire scene had been staged, the victims knew their attacker, and the attack had occurred in an extreme fit of rage. The attack on the children was personal, said Brantley. “The killer focused on their chests,” he emphasized, “almost as if going for their heart. That indicates extreme anger toward them.”
In the nearly 1 month long trial, 36 witness testified for the prosecution including police officers, paramedics, nurses, physician's, forensics experts, criminal investigators, neighbors, friends and a local merchant familiar with Darlie Routier. 16 various witnesses testified for the defense including Darlie herself. 15 other friends, family, neighbors and acquaintances testified regarding Darlie's character prior to the sentencing phase and attorney summations.
Upon the jury retiring for deliberation on February 1, 1997, 8 of the 12 jurors were immediately prepared to vote guilty, while the other 4 jurors weren't quite convinced. A few hours later (the same day) after re-examining some evidence, all 12 jurors found Darlie Routier guilty of capital murder (1st degree) of her son Damon Routier. (she was only tried for his murder)
Darlie must have sensed her guilty verdict. She began crying the moment the jurors entered the courtroom to render their verdict.. She was told to stand but remained sitting and looked up at the ceiling and wiped her cheeks with her hands as District Court Judge Mark Tolle read the guilty verdict. Her husband, Darin, leaned forward in his gallery seat and began crying as Darlie's mother, Darlie Kee, sat stone-faced. Darlie's younger sister Danelle suddenly shouted out, "They're all lying," Greg Davis (the lead prosecutor) is the killer." Judge Tolle banged his gavel down in rapid succession and shouted "Order".
At the sentencing phase of the trial Darlie Routier was sentenced to death by lethal injection.
THE "DARLIE SUPPORTERS" aka "THE CULT OF DARLIE"
No one wants to believe a mother could murder her children. Especially a pretty young mother who on the outside gave the appearance of being an attentive mom who wanted nothing but the best for her children. The jurors that were interviewed after the verdict said they went into deliberation wanting to find something to show her innocence, they just couldn't find it.
Darlie Routier denies her guilt. When interviewed, she knows exactly how and when to cry and turn on the heart tugging emotions and people eat this up. They watch these interviews and say, "There's no way she did this." These very same people turn a blind eye to the very evidence that convicted her, or simply say the crime scene processing was tainted and botched up. As mentioned previously in this article, anytime a trial verdict doesn't go the way someone wanted it to, they automatically say the system failed.
Darlie has a unique ability of mesmerizing people into believing her innocence. Every journalist that was granted an interview with Darlie in prison went in either believing she was guilty or they were undecided. Darlie will turn on the charm and the tears and use her "I'm the true victim here" little girl voice, convincing nearly each person that met with her that there was no way she could have murdered her sons.
This author has always found it interesting that now she's been convicted and placed on death row, her interviews always consist of how she didn't kill her kids and how much she misses them. She always says "All I want are people to see I'm innocent." If she were truly innocent, why isn't she saying "Hey people! There's a child killer out there on the loose, why aren't you out looking for him? I want justice for my two boys." But she never mentions that anymore like she did 25 years ago in her letters to friends and family while she was incarcerated during the trial.
The reader may recall the words of OJ Simpson when he was found not guilty. He told the media in a press conference that he was going to make it his "Mission in life" to find the killer(s) of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. Hmmm, strangely we haven't heard anything about his doing that since his 1995 press statement.
The people who believe Darlie Routier was wrongfully found guilty, also known as: "The Darlie Supporters," try their best to fit the evidence to their preconceived conclusion of innocence. If it doesn't fit, they'll make it fit; even to the level of absurdity. Most people in this group cannot put up a good argument because they just don't know enough about the case. They recite what they've heard and read on YouTube, but that's it; that's the extent of their knowledge about the Routier case. When it comes down to discussing the evidence and facts of the case, they can't keep up and the discussion on their end and it usually turns to anger. To quote the words of Abraham Lincoln: "If you can't debate the issues, demonize the opposition."
If you look at all the various websites that include reader comments sections, you'll find that approximately 90% of the Darlie supporters are female. It appears that women have more trouble accepting the fact that a mother could possibly do such a horrendous thing to her children then men do. If Darlie Routier had been a man instead of a woman, this case would have simply faded into obscurity and no one would have challenged the jury's decision. Ironically in the state of Texas, 83% of past filicide cases (parents who murder their children) were committed by the mother. In Texas alone in the past 25 years, a total of 64 children have been murdered by their mothers. (Averages about 3 per year)
Source: FBI Stats Data, Dallas News, USA Today, Plano Star Courier, San Antonio Express-News, Amarillo Globe-News
Darlie supporters fall into two distinct categories. One group has second thoughts about the trial and the evidence and in conversation will express their opinion of doubt and provide specific reasons as to why they feel that way. And that's completely fine. It's their right to have an opinion and they should be allowed the time and respect to be heard.
Then the other group with fewer members, consists of the fanatical supporters. The one's that live and breathe this 25 year old case night and day. They're angry and hateful and they're vicious with anyone that opposes their opinions; similar to a 1970's era militant group. This author's name is used in effigy as many times as the clock ticks among this group. This author has been cyber-stalked, insulted, accused of being Darin Routier himself, publicly cussed at and even more recently, threatened with physical harm similar to what happened to author Barbara Davis, until she changed her mind about Darlie's guilt.
A few members of this group can be found right here on the Darlie Routier support HubPages blogs as commenters and one as an author. Most of the HubPage authors themselves, are more controlled. One such author and this author have discussed the case on her HubPage on several occasions and we both politely agreed to disagree.
Most members of this second group get the most hateful when challenged to provide a credible source to backup a statement they've made that they're trying to pass as fact. When they can't do it, they show their a*ses with the cussing and the insults and general cyber-bullying. They go on other support sites and slander your name, make wild accusations about you, and basically set themselves up to be the receiver of a serious libel suit, which this author has been seriously considering with one particular individual. Fortunately few in numbers, people in this group display a total lack of self-control, get extremely angry when not agreed with, and most likely possess the potential for violence.
Facebook has a group calling themselves "The Extreme Darlie Support Group." Interestingly, if you look at this group's members, many of them are also members of the "Jodi Arias Support Group." That kind of speaks for itself.
Darlie supporters love to direct people to an old CBS 20/20 special taped 18 years ago in 1999, hosted by moderator Sylvia Chase. They feature juror Charlie Samford stating he was incorrect in his guilty verdict; however he has since recanted that opinion. (Discussed later in this blog) And, Sylvia Chase states the defense was never given the entire silly string video including the memorial service conducted before the spraying of the silly string. Her statement is totally untrue. Darlie's lead defense attorney, Doug Mulder, has even stated that they did receive the entire video, and for reasons unknown decided not to present it to the jury or object to the memorial service segment not being shown to the jury by the prosecution.
"If the theory doesn't match the facts, change the facts"
- Albert Einstein
(A satirical remark he made on how some people support theory)
Darlie Supporters claim that the police and the prosecution both intimidated and coerced witnesses, that the crime scene forensic procedures and evidence was mishandled, investigators destroyed and even covered up evidence of the mysterious intruder, they coerced the hospital staff into changing their testimony, they even say the crime scene photos presented in court were manipulated. (Did they have Photoshop back then?) They say the judge slept through the trial, that certain defense witnesses weren't allowed to testify, and the transcript errors were responsible for determining the outcome. They even blame the judiciary laws of the State of Texas. All of this can be found on fordarlieroutier.org and darliefacts.com.
Most of the Darlie Supporters have trouble convincing themselves or anyone else that an intruder actually entered the house; they cannot support that argument with absolutely no evidence found to suggest that anyone came in the house or exited the house. Their only argument left would have to be that either the District Attorney's office and the police intentionally framed Darlie, or Darlie's husband Darin, who was the only other adult already in the house must have done it.
Murderer Theories Ranging from Darin Routier to a Rowlett Police Officer
In recent years some of the Darlie supporters have in fact convinced themselves that Darin Routier murdered his sons. They point out that he lied in his written statements and that he lied in his court testimony; which in several instances it appears that he did. Obviously not very familiar with the case, many of Darlie's supporters raise question as to why the police and the prosecution didn't investigate him from the beginning. Darin Routier was thoroughly investigated from the git-go. As mentioned previously in this blog, prosecutor Greg Davis stated that Darin was in fact their initial prime suspect. However, despite Darin's statements not making a lot of sense and the possibility of him having a motive by collecting on a $250,000 life insurance policy, the forensic evidence at the scene simply did not link him to the actual murders, it linked Darlie to the murders. The supporters conclude that some sort of deal was made between Darin and Darlie's mother, Darlie Kee, with defense attorney Doug Mulder who in turn promised not to go after Darin. They're suggesting that the prosecution turned a blind eye to Darin and having to convict someone they just decided to hang the murders on Darlie.
In other words, what the Darlie supporters are suggesting is that this was a well-orchestrated, well-coordinated conspiracy that included local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies, hospital employees, attorneys, paramedics, neighbors and co-workers all working together hand in hand to set up Darlie Routier. And, they never offer any reasons as to why all of these different people would want to do that and perjure themselves. What was the motive behind 50 some individuals all getting together and lying and framing an innocent woman? Who masterminded such a plot? Were all these people paid to do this? Were they coerced and threatened to lie in court?
We're not talking about the JFK assassination here, Darlie Routier wasn't a high ranking government official, there weren't any powerful organizations behind this that had the ability to pull off such an act, there is no "magic bullet theory" that can be applied here. When considering the ludicrous absurdity of such a plot having taken place, it comes back around full circle to the basic facts of the case that convicted Darlie Routier; her account of what occurred the night of the murders did not match what was found at the crime scene, and the evidence that was found at the crime scene put the murder weapon in her hands.
Another supporter with his own website (The Gospel of Timothy) and YouTube video claims the boys were killed by a Rowlett police officer because he considered Damon and Devon to be demonic names.
WHAT DOES DARLIE'S CURRENT ATTORNEY THINK ABOUT DARLIE SUPPORTERS?
In an interview with Darlie's current attorney, Stephen Cooper, he was asked what he thought about the Darlie supporters that contact his office with supposed "new theories." He said he was amused by the revolving cast of weird characters and "Wanna-be Sherlock Holmes" his case keeps attracting. "It would be downright entertaining if it didn't take away so much time from what I need to be doing--researching and writing the appellate brief."
He explained that it does nothing but interfere time wise with his appeals work on Darlie's case. Especially when the supporters contact Darlie Routier's family members with some bizarre new theory or supposed "new evidence." He said, "Lawyers, the professionals, don't go to their clients and say they have the key to the jail unless they can deliver it." He further said, "Every time someone contacts Darlie's family claiming they have the evidence that will free her, I have to stop what I'm doing, listen to them, and calm them down."
THE "DARLIE WAS DRUGGED" THEORY
Some Darlie supporters claim that Darin (or someone else) drugged Darlie the night of the murders. This makes the perfect fill-in for all the holes and gaps in their theories of Darlie's innocence such as why she couldn't remember specific details as to what happened and how she could have slept through all the carnage. Most of these drug theory believers suggest it was a "date rape" drug. *The most commonly abused date rape drugs, or "club drugs," are Rohypnol, also called "roofies"; gamma hydroxybutyric acid, also called "liquid ecstasy"; ketamine, also called "Special K," and tablet form ecstasy, also called "Molly," which is often crushed and mixed into a drink.
*Though these different drugs can cause memory lapses, most of them have amphetamine properties and will cause a lot of difficulty sleeping. Darlie claims she slept through everything. *Each of these drugs cause bad "hang-over" signs and symptoms which Darlie never complained to anyone that she had. The problem with the theory of Darlie being drugged is that a toxicology screen was conducted on her prior to the exploratory surgery on her neck in the hospital. Mild to moderate amounts of amphetamines were found in her system and Dr. Santos testified that this could have been the result of her taking diet pills. *Date rape drug residuals stay in the system anywhere from 8 to 72 hours and would have shown up on her toxicology screen. * Source: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, WebMD
Despite what many Darlie supporters say and believe, she was not convicted by the silly string video. While deliberating, the jury requested to see the video again and a couple of the juror's later stated that they watched it 6 or 7 times. Darlie and her mother claim they watched it 9 times. (They must have both been in the deliberation room with the jurors) The silly string video certainly didn't win her any points with the jury, but what convicted her was the preponderance of blood evidence that pointed to nobody but her. There was blood all over the carpet around the boys and all over the kitchen floor. Subsequently, only her bloody footprints were discovered, no other footprints were found, anywhere. The blood evidence, her inconsistent and illogical accounts of what took place, and the letters that she wrote to friends and family are what sealed her fate. Every juror that was able to be interviewed after the trial confirmed that. They were convinced that she was lying.
What the Darlie supporters, including Darlie Kee cannot explain, is why Darlie constantly changed her accounts of what took place. And not simple changes, major changes; Darlie supporters say it's because she was on pain killers and anti-depressants after the murders and it affected her recall of the events. Psychologist Dr. Lisa Clayton, handsomely paid by the defense for her testimony, testified Routier exhibited the typical blackouts and distorted memory of people who experience a profound trauma and are forced to give clear descriptions of it soon after the event.
Yet in jailhouse letters to friends and private conversations to friends and family before she was arrested, (even with the hospital staff) she appeared to have perfect detailed recollections of what took place, and never mentioned she couldn't remember anything. Rowlett police office Waddell (first officer to arrive on the scene) testified that when he first asked Darlie what had happened, she was upset but appeared to be perfectly alert and gave him a clear account of what had occurred. She never mentioned to him that there was anything she couldn't remember. She definitely remembered to give everyone a reason as to why her finger prints were on the murder weapon.
As previously mentioned, most people who think Darlie is innocent claim the errors in the transcripts give her the right to a retrial.The errors were corrected by another official court reporter using audio tapes of the trial, the trial court approved the accuracy of the corrections, and the appellate court denied her motion for retrial and/or acquittal based on transcript errors. Supporters like to say she was convicted on circumstantial evidence. The majority of murder convictions are based on circumstantial evidence. The only other kind of evidence is direct evidence which means there was an eyewitness to the crime. Most multiple murders do not have eye witnesses.
The supporters claim that if Darlie's under arm bruise photos had been shown to the jury it would have made a difference during deliberations. As already established, those photos were in fact shown in court and to the jury, and discussed in detail with Dr. Santos for about 45 minutes on the witness stand.
The Darlie supports say that if the entire "Silly String Tape" had been shown in court, including the private memorial service that took place prior to the celebration, it would have made a difference. Darlie Routier's defense team had a copy of the entire tape made at the cemetery in their possession. For whatever reason, they did not object to or even mention the private memorial service not shown in court.
Darlie supporters claim that the crime scene was contaminated due to the large number of police, firefighters, paramedics, crime scene technicians, etc. "Coming and going through the house." Darlie testified on the witness stand that beside the paramedics, there were up to six firefighters in the house. By the paramedics request, a Rowlett fire department engine company was dispatched to the house to assist with CPR on Damon, however, they never entered the house. There were two, two person paramedic team ambulances from the fire department on scene tending to the boys and Darlie, two medics inside, two medics outside. These two medic's tending to Darlie were outside the front door and never entered the house. As far as excessive traffic in and around the actual crime scene, Lt Jack was adamant about preserving the crime scene and keeping it secure. Police officers Wade and Ferrie testified in court that were posted at the front door and were ordered not to let anyone in the house during the investigation. Officer Wade testified that he wouldn't even let the Rowlett Chief of Police (Randall Posey) in the house during the initial investigation.
Prosecution: Okay, Officer Wade, you actually told your Chief he couldn't come in?
Officer Wade: That is correct.
Prosecution: Okay. And he didn't go in?
Officer Wade: No, sir, he did not.
Prosecution: Okay. Was that the only person that tried to get in?
Officer Wade: Yes, sir
Supporters say a motive was never properly established and Darlie Routier was a loving mother that would never do this to her children. (based on watching home movies of Darlie on YouTube) Though not required for a conviction, an established motive can certainly be the decision maker. The prosecution did try to paint a picture of Darlie as a vain person that cared a lot about her appearance. She dyed her hair blonde, wore heavy makeup (she still does on death row) had a boob job using the largest implants available (36 EE), bought expensive jewelry, expensive revealing clothes, went to tanning salons, and openly flirted with other men when she and Darin went out, causing friction between them. They stated that she was a very materialistic person and was quite comfortable living in the upper middle class world and spending money.
BRIEFLY LIVING THE GOOD LIFE AND DARLIE'S DEPRESSION
Darin had developed and created his own business called Testnec. It made and tested printed computer circuit boards and the business flourished in its early years. Originally running the company from his house, Darin's business soon took off and was even able to secure high paying contracts with Lockheed and NASA. The Routier's bought a large $130,000 2-story home of neo-Georgian design near Lake Ray Hubbard in upscale Rowlett, Texas, (a suburb of Dallas) and filled it with brand new furniture. They bought an SUV, bought a Jaguar, bought a 30 foot cabin cruiser, installed a large somewhat gaudy fountain complete with running water and lights in their front yard, and had a $9,000 redwood spa built in the backyard. The spa had a hot tub, a TV, a bar, and a stereo system in it.
As time went by, the business began to level out and after a couple of years began decreasing as technology improved and Darin's contracted work wasn't required as much by the big electronics companies as it once was. However, the Routier's continued to spend money as the bills were beginning to pile up. Darlie had gained weight after the birth of her third child, Drake, and was having bouts of depression. She was even taking depression meds prescribed by her physician.
Darin continually told investigators that his business was secure financially. He said that money wasn't a problem with the family, and even if they were in trouble, a poor financial situation would not have been a motive for Darlie to kill the children. When investigators went to Darin's place of business with a search warrant, the building and offices were unoccupied and it appeared it had been closed for some time.
On May 3, 1996, Darlie wrote to her three sons in her diary stating that she hoped one day they will forgive her for what she was about to do. "My life has been such a hard fight for a long time and I just can't find the strength to keep fighting anymore." (Barbara Davis, Precious Angels, pages 90-91).
On May 9th, the Routier's received a letter from American Express demanding immediate payment of nearly $1,000 for an outstanding credit card balance. On May 23, 1996, they received a notice of foreclosure on their house (Barbara Davis, Precious Angels, pg. 93). At this point, Darin and Darlie's personal debt was more than $ 200,000 (Barbara Davis, Precious Angels, pg. 94).
Darin then went to Bank One on June 1st and filled out a loan application for $5,000, but was turned down later that same day.(Barbara Davis, Precious Angels, pg. 94). Darin reapplied two days later, added some collateral to try to help push the loan through, but he was turned down again. Darin first told investigators and family members that the loan was for a family vacation, but he later told investigators that the loan was actually to buy a pickup truck for Darlie's sister.
The Routier's owed $10,000 in back taxes, had a $12,000 credit card bill and they were struggling to make their $1,300 a month house payments. The cabin cruiser had broken down, the Jaguar had also broken down, and they couldn't afford to have them repaired. They were a month behind on the house payment and were at risk of losing their home with less than $2,000 in their accounts.
When Darlie was formally charged with murder, Darin let the house get foreclosed on and Darlie had to get a public defender.
As mentioned previously, Darlie had contemplated suicide a month before the murders and had written about it in her diary. She told a close friend about it who testified to this in court. Some of Darlie's friends and acquaintances stated that she appeared to act differently and wasn't her usual self. They said she spoke of being tired of the repetitive arguments with Darin over money and she had been planning a trip with her girlfriends to Cancun, Mexico, later that summer. Although portrayed as a loving doting mother in home videos, some neighbors and acquaintances stated that they noticed that Darlie had begun to not pay very close attention to the children when they were outside and often seemed aggravated when they were around.
WAS DARLIE A GOOD MOTHER?
It seems only fitting to lead off this segment with a seldom referenced fact that you won't hear the Darlie supporters ever mention. On July 3, 1996 a few weeks after Darlie's arrest, a pre-custody hearing for Drake was held in Dallas TX. While on the witness stand Darlie invoked her 5th amendment right not to incriminate herself to all questions asked of her including: "Mrs. Routier, do you love your children?"
SOURCE: Dallas Morning News, July 4, 1996, by Michael Saul
So, Darlie appeared to be a good mother. When looking at photos and video, the children are smiling and seem to be having a good time. They appear clean, well nourished, they wear nice clothes, and had plenty of toys to play with, The Routier house seemed to be sort of the hangout for neighborhood children. Some of the local children even compared the house to a popular video game.
As far as Darlie's attentiveness to the children; during the post-conviction / pre-sentencing phase of the trial, an 18 year old girl from the neighborhood named Allison Hennessey testified. Allison had become friends with Darlie when she was 16. She had met Darlie through one her friends named Renee Stanley. Renee, also 16 at the time, was the regular babysitter that Darlie frequently called. Allison testified that on numerous occasions when she would visit her friend Renee at the Routier home with Darlie there, Darlie would purchase cigarettes for Allison, allowed her to drink Zima coolers, which were drinks containing alcohol, and even allowed her to smoke marijuana in the house. Allison testified that Darlie kept a supply of marijuana in a zip-lock bag in a cabinet above the washer and dryer in the utility room. When asked what Damon and Devon would be doing when this occurred, Allison stated either playing in the water fountain in the front yard, or running up and down the street.
Some say Darlie was known to have a short fuse with her children. Eileen Shirmer, a neighbor of Darlie's that took her child to Devon’s fifth birthday party, testified in court that Darlie became enraged over getting water on her from the kids playing with their squirt guns. She took a piece of cake in her hand and smashed and smeared it in Devon’s face. When he started crying she told him he deserved it. According to Barbara Davis' book, Precious Angels, family member Jackie Rogers stated that the way Darlie ordered Devon around and "beat him down" she considered it emotional abuse.
Opinions on Darlie among her neighbors vary. Some have said she was a kind, loving, attentive mother, and some neighbors told the local press when interviewed that it was commonplace to hear Darlie scream at Devon and Damon to "Get your asses out of the house," and around 9:00 pm she would go out in the yard and scream "Devon, Damon, get your asses in the house." Several neighbors told local press that Damon and Devon always ran up and down the street unsupervised and hearing Darlie use the "F" word outside around the kids was about an everyday occurrence.
Supposedly, three days after the boy's funeral, when the crime scene at the house had been cleared, Darlie needed to get some clothes and a few personal items from the house. She called a friend, Mercedes Adams, and asked her if she would drive her over there. Mercedes agreed with reservation fearing that Darlie would fall apart walking into the very place her two sons were brutally murdered. Mercedes stated that Darlie just walked right in the door like she had left there that morning and shouted, "Look at this f**king mess! It'll cost us a fortune to fix this shit!"
Mercedes commented; "Right there where her boys were killed, and that's the first thing she said to me. I put my hands on Darlie's shoulders and said, 'Darlie, look me in the eye and tell me you didn't kill the boys.' She looked me in the eye and said, 'I'm gonna get new carpet, new drapes, and fix this room all up."
Moments before the funeral service for the boys began, Darlie approached her two sons in their caskets. Detective David Frosch testified that he overheard Darlie whisper "I'm so sorry" in each individual casket. Several people commented that Darlie never shed a tear during the funeral.
Darlie's occasional housekeeper, Helina Czaban, stated that when she told Darlie how sorry she was for the tragedy and mentioned the expense of the funeral on top of that, Darlie replied, "I'm not worried. I'll get five-thousand dollars each for both of the boys."
A friend of the family said that after the boy's funeral the immediate family and close friends all gathered at Darlie Kee's house. It was there that Darlie announced to everyone that she and Darin already had plans in place to take a trip to Europe together, get some plastic surgery done to remove the scar from her neck, and hopefully conceive another child while on the trip, preferably a daughter. This said less than a week after the brutal murders. A relative in attendance commented, "....It was like well, I lost two children but I'll be replacing them soon." Out with the old, in with the new.
A relative that was with Darlie from her initial hospital stay though the funeral stated that the hardest she ever saw Darlie cry was the day she was arrested.
In an attempt to show Darlie's character, Greg Davis subpoenaed Kay Norris, an employee from a local pawn that Darlie frequented to purchase jewelry. Norris testified that Darlie was a rude customer that came in every week, constantly cursed her children, and demanded that Darin buy her some jewelry. She also commented that the way Darlie was dressed when she came in left little to the imagination. In attempts to show Darlie's spending habits, the prosecution also made mention that Darlie's friends had jokingly nick-named her "Shop till you drop Darlie."
DARLIE'S SELDOM MENTIONED POLYGRAPH EXAMINATION
After formal murder charges had been made and prior to Darlie's trial, her original court appointed attorneys, Doug Parks and Wayne Huff, obtained a sealed motion for a private polygraph examination of Darlie shortly before jury selection began. Though not admissible in court, the judge ordered the Dallas County jail to allow the polygraph test without the knowledge of the district attorney’s office. Darlie Routier's mother, Darlie Kee, was visiting Darlie in jail the day of the examination. At the conclusion of the polygraph, and being under the auspices of attorney/client privilege and work product ethics, Parks would only say the examination was "inconclusive," but he didn't say she passed it either. The jailer assigned to escort Darlie back to her cell later stated that he observed both Darlie and her mother sobbing at the conclusion of the testing. Darlie Kee has emphatically denied that this examination took place although official court and jail records show that at 2:30 PM Friday October 4th, 1996, Routier was moved from her cell in the Lew Sterrett Justice Center, through the basement sally port, into a room at the Crowley Courts Building. It was in there that she was given a polygraph exam which lasted six hours, and the Routier defense was billed $1,000 for the exam and consultation fees. With Darlie Kee denying the polygraph took place, and attorney Doug Parks' not saying she passed the examination, (If she had he would have shouted it from the rooftops) the reader can make their own conclusion as to whether she passed it or not. Darlie even admitted to taking this polygraph later in a 2001 prison interview. Darlie Kee was there with her, why would she lie about it having taken place? Just a wild guess might be because Darlie failed it.
THE WET TOWEL CONTROVERSY
Darlie told Detective Frosh that prior to police arrival, she carried towels to Damon and to Devon to help stop the bleeding. She also wrote this in her written statement to police on June 8th. (2 days after the murders) Darlie claimed that she put a towel on Damon’s back. Darlie supporters are quick to say this is how Damon and Devon's blood got on her nightshirt. She also testified to this while on the witness stand during the trial.
She first mentioned this in court while testifying and being questioned by her attorney, Doug Mulder.
Darlie Routier: I got the towels, and I was calling 911 as I got the towels.
Doug Mulder: After you got the towels wet, did you take those to Darin?
Darlie Routier: I got a couple of towels wet and I went to Damon first…I put a towel on my baby’s back.
Doug Mulder: Okay. So you got the towels?
Darlie Routier: I was calling 911 as I got the towels. I got the towels and I went to the sink and I got the towels wet
Doug Mulder: All right. And after you got the 3 towels wet, did you take those to Darin?
Darlie Routier: I got a couple of towels wet, I went to Damon first.
Doug Mulder: Okay.
Darlie Routier: I put a towel on Damon's back. There's been a lot of controversy that I didn't do that, but I did do that. I put a towel on my baby's back.
Darin Routier, Darlie's husband was called to testify and also asked about the towels that Darlie stated she placed on Damon's back.
Doug Mulder: This towel that you say was on the back of Damon, was it still on his back when the police officers came in?
Darin Routier: I believe it was.
Doug Mulder: You didn’t remove it, did you?
Darin Routier: No.
When Greg Davis was questioning David Waddell, the first police officer to arrive on the scene. Davis asked Waddell what Darlie was doing when he arrived. He stated that she was standing in the kitchen area talking on the phone (to the 911 operator still) and holding a towel to her neck. Darin was attempting CPR on Devon but Darlie didn't go near Damon who was still barely alive at this time.
Greg Davis: Was there anything on Damon’s back, such as a towel, a rag, anything besides the clothes he was wearing?
Officer Waddell: No. I told the defendant to get some towels and put them on the child’s back to try to stop his bleeding.
As mentioned earlier, when Darlie told Waddell that the intruder might still be in the garage he walked out of sight of Darlie into the utility room and toward the garage but decided the smart thing to do would be to wait for backup before checking the dark garage by himself, so he walked back into the kitchen. He explained this action and his rational to Greg Davis.
Greg Davis: Where is the defendant when you come back to the kitchen area?
Officer Waddell: In the same position.
Prosecutor Davis: She’s not over here with Damon?
Officer Waddell: No. I told her (Darlie) a second time to get towels and put them on Damon’s back.
Greg Davis: And what did she do?
Officer Waddell:. Nothing. She kept telling me that when she chased the suspect across the kitchen, that he’d dropped the knife and she’d picked up the knife and brought it back and set it on the counter. And she told me she thought she’d messed up the fingerprints.
After Officer Matt Walling arrived on the scene (Waddell's backup) the two officers searched the house. After not finding anyone they returned to the kitchen area. Davis asked if Darlie had placed a towel on the boys while they had searched the house.
Greg Davis: Did you look over to see if a rag or towel or anything had been placed on Damon’s back?
Officer Waddell Yes sir. There was none.
Paramedic Jack Kolbye, the paramedic that tended to Damon in the house was called to testify. He too was asked about these towels.
Greg Davis: Where was Darlie when you came into the room?
Paramedic Kolbye: She was standing next to Officer Waddell on the family room side of the bar, holding a towel to her neck.
Greg Davis: Was there a rag or towel or anything else on top of Damon?
Paramedic Kolbye: No, there was not.
Greg Davis: Are you sure about that?
Paramedic Kolbye: I’m absolutely sure about that.
A total of 21 towels and washcloths were found in the home. At the crime scene investigators collected 3 damp towels from the utility room, 2 towels from the basket in the utility room, 4 washcloths from the top of the stairs, 3 towels from the backyard spa. None of these were connected to the murders. Two hand towels were found and photographed in the hallway, but both only had Darlie's blood on them where she had been holding them to her neck. Most of towels were scattered around a good distance from the boys. Neither Devon nor Damon's blood was found on any of the towels. One towel and one washcloth were discovered to have blood on them which were both identified as belonging to Darlie. A green and white washcloth in the kitchen area is the one Officer Waddell observed Darlie holding to her neck when he first entered the house. Darlie had obviously lied about placing a towel on Damon. It also appears that from the time Officer Waddell arrived on the scene to the time Darlie was transported to the hospital, that she never attempted to render any kind of care to her dying son, Damon. The transcripts also suggest that Darin Routier lied as well during his own testimony about the towels.
Darlie, who testified before Darin, stated that she did take a towel over to Devon. She first stated that she laid the towel on one of Devon's chest wounds, then while still testifying she changed it to laying the towel next to Devon.
Darin never mentioned a word about towels or Darlie bringing him towels in his written police statement, but he testified in court that she brought him 3 or 4 towels. Again, none of the towels recovered from the crime scene had Damon or Devon's blood on them; only Darlie's. Paramedic Jack Kolby testified that there was absolutely no towel(s) on or near Damon, and Paramedic Koschak testified that he didn't recall seeing any towels on or around Devon. Some supporters have gone as far as to say both paramedics we're lying. (What possible reason would the medics have for lying?)
What appears to be a towel in the photo above was used as evidence by the defense to show that Darlie did run wet towels to Darin to assist in first aid to Devon. The problem however, is that the towel was dry, not wet as Darlie testified and the blood tested on it was not Devon's, it was her's. As obvious as that towel is next to Devon's body, how could paramedic Brian Koschak not have seen it when he checked on Devon? This suggests that the towel either got moved accidentally by investigators (which is highly unlikely) or it got placed there by someone (possibly Darin?) sometime after paramedic Koschak checked Devon and the time the police forensic team photographed the crime scene.
Darlie never mentioned anything about applying wet towels to anyone in her June 6, 1996 formal written statement to police. As Barbara Davis, author of Precious Angles, wrote, "The wet towel story was born when Darin and Darlie realized that the police had taken the kitchen sink as evidence, and that the boys’ spatter/cast-off blood had been found on the shoulder areas of her nightshirt."
On the Leeza Gibbons show that aired in 1998, Darin Routier stated as fact "There were 21 towels in the house, 4 were on one boy, 3 were on the other." Interestingly, none of these "wet" towels were seen, recovered, or photographed when police and EMS arrived at the house 3 minutes after the 911 call.
THE MYSTERIOUS BLACK CAR
As with most mystery movies, the Darlie supporters have thrown a black car into the mix. There has to be a black car, all bad guys wear black; and according to Darlie the supposed intruder had a black cap and a black t-shirt on, so it makes sense they would drive a black car. A suspicious black car supposedly had been driving through the neighborhood and at one point even watched the Routier house. There's not a lot to say about this except mentioning that a black car driving through a populated sub division in a busy residential Dallas suburb wouldn't be all that unusual. Especially when you consider that according to Motor Trend Magazine the color black on a car is the second most popular color among consumers worldwide. (white being the first) And we might want to consider that a black car that a neighbor spotted supposedly driving slowly past the Routier house the evening of the murders ended up parked across the street a few houses down in a driveway and happened to belong to the person that lived there, It was also there the entire next day.
The only report to police of what was referred to as a suspicious car driving through the neighborhood on June 6th shortly before or around the estimated time of the murders was reported by neighbor Sally Bingham. It must not have disturbed her too much because she didn't notify police of this car until the next day after she learned of the murders. And, the problem with this fitting the Darlie supporter's black car theory is that the car Sally reported was white. The police did check out the owners of black vehicles in the area, all were cleared of being linked to the murders.
WAS DARIN ROUTIER MORE INVOLVED THAN WE KNOW?
Those that believe Darlie to be innocent as well as those that steadfastly believe in her guilt do seem to agree on at least one aspect of the case; that Darin Routier was somehow involved. The speculations range from people thinking he may have murdered the boys and attacked Darlie himself in order to cash in on a $250,000 insurance policy, to his helping Darlie stage the crime scene and attempt to cover up what she had done.
Despite what most Darlie supporters claim, Darin Routier was initially the prime suspect until the physical evidence pointed directly to Darlie. Even so, the prosecution was suspicious of Darin's role in the murders. On November 15, 1996 (about 2 months before the trial) prosecutors publicly suggested that Darin might have helped Darlie stage the crime scene to mislead investigators. They cited fibers found on Darin's tennis shoes matched fibers from a sock stained with the boys' blood. Assistant District Attorney Greg Davis said in court papers that investigators also found head hairs matching Darin on the murder weapon. Does this suggest Darin was involved? He lived there, of course his hair is going to be in the house and if he wore that sock, it's not at all unusual that fibers would be found in his shoe. All this proves is that thorough investigative police work took place.
Fifteen months after Darlie was on death row, a somewhat eccentric Waco, Texas multi-millionaire, Brian Pardo, believed Darlie to be innocent. He spent $100,000 financing a private investigation of her case. Pardo had done this before with 38 year old death row inmate David Wayne Spence, found guilty of murdering 3 teenagers in a park. Despite Pardo's efforts, Spence was executed in 1997. In order to rule out Darin Routier as a suspect, Pardo talked him into taking a polygraph examination. He not only failed the examination, he failed it big time. Darin denied involvement of any kind and said the examination results were wrong. On the 1998 Leeza Gibbons show, Darin's mother, Sarilda Routier, claimed he failed it because he hadn't eaten and all he had was a Dr. Pepper that day. Apparently you need to stay away from that Dr. Pepper if you're about to take a polygraph. The overwhelming evidence against Darlie, and Darin's failing the polygraph convinced Pardo to drop his financial assistance.
Darin later did admit to partaking in an insurance scam involving the Jaguar and talked to people about staging a house break in and robbery for insurance purposes but never carried through on it.
In the affidavit signed by Darin Routier where he admitted to looking into hiring someone to burglarize their home as part of an insurance scam that never took place; he also admitted that Darlie asked him for a divorce on the night of the murders. This was confirmed by Darlie's attorney, Stephan Cooper.
During the trial, the prosecution suggested that Darlie saw her two older boys as the source of her woes; she lost control of herself, and killed them as a means of putting an end to her personal problems, or as a way to spite Darin after several weeks of bickering about financial problems. They claimed that could have been the reason for her sleeping downstairs for three nights prior to the murders.
This is the one area where I, the author, disagree with the prosecution. They appeared to lean toward the theory of Darlie having planned the murders. I think her decision to kill her sons was spontaneous. I think it was an unplanned spur of the moment decision resulting from a fit of rage. This will be explained in more detail in the conclusion to this blog.
DARLIE'S NECK WOUND AND THE BARKING DOG
Darlie supporters love to nitpick on small issues of what occurred that night and raise an argument to contend that she couldn't have murdered her children. What they don't mention very often are the major items that convicted her, such as the blood spatter on her nightshirt predominately on the right arm area, Darlie's blood and bloody footprints at the sink, (which she initially denied standing in front of) the blood wiped up at the sink, not one single bloody intruder footprint anywhere, Darlie's picking up the knife, how she could have slept through everything, and of course her ever changing stories to police and during her court testimony.
Darlie supporters contend she couldn't have possibly self-inflicted her wounds. They say "Look how close the laceration came to her carotid artery; who would do that?" Darlie Routier had no medical certification or training of any kind. She had a high school education and just barely graduated at that. She knew nothing about the anatomy and physiology of the vascular system. How would she know how deep or how shallow to cut herself? She just wanted to make it appear that someone had tried to kill her.
Supporters make issue of the small family dog, Domain, who reportedly was losing his mind barking at police from upstairs upon their arrival. They question how breaking glass could have woken Darin up (as per his testimony) instead of the dog that they say must have been barking the entire time the boys were murdered.
When listening to the 911 tape the dog isn't heard barking at all for the first 3 minutes and 30 seconds of the call, despite all the shouting going on between Darin and Darlie. Darlie friend/neighbor Karen Neal testified for the defense that the dog barked at everyone, including family members. Well apparently not the night of the murders. It only started barking when Officer Waddell, a stranger to the dog, entered the house. The dog also tried to bite Officer Mark Wyman as he ascended the stairs. It makes you wonder how the dog and it's barking didn't run off a supposed intruder. The "Darin-did-it" believers all say "Easy question, Darin locked the dog up in a room while he murdered his sons" They've yet to provide proof of that of course and who's to say the dog wasn't locked up every night when they went to bed?.
In her book "Precious Angels" Barbara Davis wrote “During one of (Detective) Patterson’s visits at the hospital to check on Darlie, he mentioned that the dog had been barking like crazy and would not shut up. He told her a neighbor had to help calm him down just to pick him up and take him out of there. Darlie looked at the detective and responded, “Oh, he always goes off like that when someone he doesn’t know walks in the door.” Patterson was immediately alert. “Did you hear him bark the night of the attack?” Darlie paused, then calmly replied, “Come to think of it, no, he didn’t.” (p.121)
I personally own a Great Pyrenees, he's a large dog with a loud bark and roams free around my house at night. (I live out in the country) He barks at everything at night, possums, squirrels, raccoons, skunks, deer; you name it, he barks at it. When I first got him I thought I'd never sleep at night due to his constant barking. After owning him for about 3 years now I've been able to mentally tune him out. I don't even hear him anymore while I'm sleeping because I'm so used to hearing him bark. If the Routier dog barked at every strange noise as stated, Darin, Darlie and the boys could have easily grown accustomed to the barking and tuned it out as well. No big mystery there and proof of nothing.
WHAT ACTUALLY CONVICTED DARLIE ROUTIER
Simply put, Darlie's numerous ever changing versions of what took place and in particular, the blood evidence is what convicted her. Her version(s) of what occurred in that house did not at all match with the crime scene. Her family and supporters can come up with every explanation in the world and the fact still remains that the blood evidence directly connects Darlie to the crime with no evidence of an intruder or anyone else having been involved. And of course, as mentioned earlier in this article, the supporters realize this and simply say, "Easy answer, the evidence investigators manipulated the crime scene to make it look like Darlie was the killer." Preposterous claims of this nature weren't even considered by Darlie's defense attorneys.
CHANGING STORIES RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING
Darlie’s 5 different versions of waking up
- Darlie testified in court that Damon woke her up on the couch pulling on her nightshirt and saying “Mommy, mommy, mommy.” Then she said she looked over and saw a man walking away through the kitchen going toward the utility room.
- She told her friend’s Barbara Jovel and Karen Neal as well as two nurses at the hospital that she heard Damon going " Mommy, mommy. mommy" and she felt pressure on her legs. She said she opened her eyes and a man was swinging a knife straight down at her throat. She further said if she hadn't put her arm up, he would have killed her. (Not mentioned in her trial testimony)
- She told Rowlett police officer Matt Walling and later, Barbara Jovel (a second time) that she woke up to an intruder sitting on her legs and added “He was rubbing a knife blade on my face.” (Not mentioned in her trial testimony)
- In Darlie's written statement to police, 2 days after the murders, she never mentions anything about Damon saying "Mommy, mommy, mommy," she states the she woke up to Damon pushing on her shoulder and crying.
- Darlie told her husband, Darin, that she first woke up from the weight of an intruder sitting on her legs on the couch where she had a brief struggle with him. In this initial version, there was no mention of Damon tapping on her shoulder, or saying mommy, mommy, mommy, or a man rubbing a knife blade on her face as she told Officer Matt Walling and Barbara Jovel. Darin passed this version of her story on to Child Protective Services worker, Jamie Johnson, when she interviewed him.
Darlie’s 4 different versions of fighting the intruder
- She told Officer David Waddell that she fought with the intruder at the end of the kitchen bar (facing the family room)
- She told Officer Matt Walling she fought with the intruder at the couch while she was still laying on it
- In her formal written statement to police, dated June 6th, 1996, she never once mentions fighting any intruder. She states Damon woke her up, she saw a man standing at her feet, he walked past her, though the kitchen, though the utility room and out through the garage.
- On the 911 tape she told dispatcher Doris Tramwell that she fought with the intruder but didn’t specify a location. She told the dispatcher "...I was fighting" but in court she tried to say her words were "...I was frightening," which obviously makes no sense at all.
BLOOD AT THE KITCHEN AND THE LIVING ROOM COUCH
Darlie's 2 different versions about her standing at the kitchen sink
1. Darlie initially told police investigators that she never stood at the kitchen sink despite her blood being found on it, in it, and around it, as well as Luminol indicating that her bloody footprints had been wiped up from the floor near it. And despite a puddle of Darlie's blood drops on top of blood drops indicating she had stood there for some time. (Believed to be where she cut her throat)
2. Then, when police investigators physically removed the sink from the house to take it to the lab for testing, Darlie suddenly remembers (the same day they removed it) and most likely from the advice of counsel, that she was in front of the sink supposedly wetting towels to place on the boys; which there's no evidence of ever having occurred.
Here's an excerpt from Darlie's arrest warrant referencing the sink and the couch:
"Darlie has never mentioned to us being near the kitchen sink, which is on the west wall of the kitchen, during or after the offense. The physical evidence investigators examined that area and determined that there had been significant quantities of blood shed immediately in front of the sink. Although attempts had been made to clean the counter top and sink, tests with Luminol revealed blood on the top of the counter in front of the sink and on the floor. Nabors, Cron, other officers, and I have all examined the couch where Darlie says she was sleeping when she was attacked; although there are quantities of blood throughout the room and around the boys, there was no appreciable blood on the couch where Darlie's head, neck, and shoulders were located at the time she says (in one of her versions) she was stabbed by her assailant. Our opinion from this blood evidence is that Darlie self-inflicted her wounds while standing at the kitchen sink."
The blood on the couch and pillow is what the Darlie supporters contend prove she was telling the truth about fighting an intruder. But that's not what she first reported; she first said she fought the intruder at the bar. There was no blood cast off on the couch suggesting a struggle, and no individual drops were found, just smears of Darlie's blood. Luminol testing on the side of the couch also revealed a child's hand print that had been deliberately wiped off. It was later identified as Damon's.
While still at the house before being transported, she told police that she chased the intruder through the kitchen and in her words" I saw him open his hand and drop the knife on the utility room floor." The shape and consistency of the blood drops found on the living room and kitchen floor indicated she was walking, not running at any time, as she claimed while supposedly chasing the intruder.
Rowlett Detective Jimmy Patterson even documented this in his June 18, 1996 arrest warrant" "Darlie told us that she saw the assailant drop the knife in the utility room."
Then in court on the stand the whole story changes again, she testified "He was gone, I walked through the kitchen and saw the knife lying on the floor. It was between the kitchen and the utility room." Then she went on to say that she picked up the knife and put it on the counter. These two stories are completely different from one another. The prosecution stated that Darlie had learned from her lawyer (through the discovery file) before she was put on the stand that there were no spatter marks found in the utility room floor to corroborate her version of "seeing" the intruder drop the knife as she was chasing him. So, on the witness stand, most likely under the advice of counsel. she changed her story to "finding" the knife lying on the floor.
EXAMINING DARLIE'S CALL TO 911
Many Darlie supporters claim that the 911 call proves her innocence when in fact it actually puts her behind the 8 ball. Her original claim regarding her discovery of the murder weapon (the knife) occurred during the 911 call. At two minutes and two seconds into the call. She tells police 911 operator Doris Trammell "...some man came in, stabbed my babies, stabbed me - I woke up - I was fighting - he ran out through the garage and threw the knife down - my babies are dying - they're dead - oh my God..."
Detective Patterson stated: "She told me that the assailant “ran away” and that she “ran” behind him into the kitchen. At that time, Darlie told me that she didn’t see the knife on the utility room floor until she went back to the kitchen doorway near the family room to turn on the light, and that she then saw the knife by looking over the kitchen island toward the utility room floor. When I examined the scene after she told me this version of her story, I was unable to see the utility room floor from the vicinity of the light switch by looking across and over the kitchen island, because the island is too large, and I am taller than Darlie." She had obviously lied to Detective Patterson.
Back to the 911 call, around 4 minutes into the call Darlie can be heard telling the first officer on the scene, David Waddell, “Look out in the garage. They left a knife lying on the…” then dispatcher Doris Trammell interrupts her and says, “Don’t touch anything,” and Darlie replies “I already touched it and picked it up.” Also interesting are Darlie's references to the intruder during the 911 call. She bounces back and forth from saying "he" and "they."
She could never explain how this intruder was able to run through the kitchen, through the blood, through the utility room and garage, without leaving a single bloody footprint anywhere, yet her bloody footprints were found all over the kitchen floor mostly going back and forth from the kitchen sink to the couch area. No blood spatter marks were found on any floor; the kitchen floor, the utility room floor or the garage floor indicating the knife being dropped or "thrown down" as she told the 911 operator. And, that knife had a good deal of blood on it.
Darlie claimed she slept downstairs because baby Drake's tossing and turning kept her awake, yet her two boys are viciously stabbed to death just a few feet away, the intruder gets on top of her on the couch and slashes her several times and she sleeps through all this until Damon wakes her up?
Some supporters claim state that the 911 call shows that Darin didn't arrive downstairs until minutes after Darlie made the call. (He's heard talking to Darlie 30 seconds into the call.) Darlie even said in her initial written statement to police that she screamed for Darin and he was there before she called 911
"I looked over and saw the door shut to the garage, and so I thought he might still be in there, and I needed to get Darin. I ran back through the kitchen, and realized that the entire living room area had blood all over everything. I put the knife on the counter and ran into the entrance, turned on the light and started screaming for Darin. I think I screamed twice, and he ran out of the bedroom with his jeans on, and no glasses and was yelling, 'What is it? What is it?' "I remember saying that he cut them. He tried to kill me. My neck. He ran down the stairs and into the room where the boys were. I grabbed the phone and called 911."
Some Darlie supporters have tried to blame the Rowlett 911 dispatcher (Doris Trammell) for Damon's death due to not giving Darlie first aide instructions over the phone. To be able to do that requires a special level of training called Emergency Medical Dispatcher, or EMD. Dispatchers with EMD certification provide 911 centers with trained personnel that can give a 911 caller pre-EMS arrival medical instructions in accordance with local medical protocols as defined by the local medical director. (An MD) The murders occurred in 1996, The Texas Department of State Health Services didn't approve and incorporate Emergency Medical Dispatchers until November of 1999. (Rule 157.49)
DARLIE ROUTIER'S TESTIMONY AND THE INCRIMINATING LETTERS
Probably the biggest mistake made by Darlie Routier and her defense counsel during the trial was her insistence on testifying and her being allowed to. She was her own worst enemy on the witness stand under cross examination. The prosecution even commented later that Darlie was their best witness. When the prosecution would point out inconsistencies in her statements and get her cornered, she would either cry and use what prosecutor Toby Shook referred to as "selective amnesia" and say "I just don't remember." even though most of the things that she just couldn't remember were things she had already told other people. Some readers may recall that this same "selective amnesia" tactic was used quite a bit in the high-profile trial of Jodi Arias (convicted of brutally murdering her boyfriend) when she would get cornered by the prosecution on the stand or caught in a lie, she too would reply "I just don't remember."
Darlie completely folded up during her testimony, or as one court reporter put it, "The prosecution made mincemeat of her on the stand." Prosecutor Toby Shook hammered her with question after question after question that she couldn't answer. He asked her why she told one policeman one thing and something completely different to another; he asked why her dog didn't bark when the intruder entered the house, he asked why the blood at the kitchen sink and counter had been cleaned up, he asked her why the 18 minute security light wasn't on when police arrived 3 minutes after the 911 call, he asked her why there were no blood drops, bloody footprints, or bloody finger prints in the garage, at the screen, the window, the yard, the gate, he asked her how she could possibly sleep through an intruder viciously stabbing her boys just a few feet from her and cutting her without hearing anything or waking up....she began crying and would reply "I don't know, I don't remember." (She said that phrase 72 times during her testimony)
Darlie consistently told investigators that she could not remember the intruders face. She described his clothes and approximate height, but she stated that she either didn't look at his face or couldn't remember it. Then while in jail awaiting trial over the course of Nov. 1, 2, and 3, 1996, she wrote a series of letters to family and friends. She wrote five letters including one to her neighbor and friend Karen Neal, and to her Aunt Sandy. Both letters stated " I know who did it, Glenn did, I saw him. I know he did it." The letter to Aunt Sandy further stated: "We believe we know who did it. That FBI guy is working on it. We have two months to work on it. We already have so much on him. I really believe he did it. Darin will have to tell you about him it's a long story, I know it's him. I saw him and I know it's him" The jailers intercepted the letters and gave them to the DA's office.
When prosecutor Toby Shook began reading the letters to Darlie while on the witness stand, she asked him: "Where did you get those? Those are my private letters." Shook told her they had been intercepted by her jailers. She actually asked the judge if it was legal to do that which resulted in the courtroom spectators (including some jurors) breaking out in laughter. Judge Tolle using his gavel had to call the court back to order. At this point Darlie began crying again. Shook produced a third letter and read out loud "I know who did it, and it's driving me crazy that he is out there running free.." Then he read out loud a fourth letter to one of Darlie's friends stating: "I'm praying they'll be able to get a confession from Glenn." Then yet a fifth letter sent to her Aunt LouAnn, Shook read out loud: "We know who did this and we're trying to get more on him." Darlie was crying non-stop at this point and Shook stopped reading the letters.
Investigators located Glenn Mize the man Darlie was referring to. Mize was a friend of one of Darin's employees. Darlie had told Mize's wife about him cussing out their secretary on one occasion and that she didn't appreciate it. In turn, Mize was upset with Darlie and supposedly called her and according to Darlie, he threatened her. Prosecutor Toby Shook brought him in to the courtroom in front of the jury while Darlie was on the witness stand. Mize didn't at all fit the physical description Darlie had given police of the intruder and when he was presented to her, she denied that he was man that attacked her.
THE EVIDENCE INDEPENDANTLY REVISITED
In 2014, a group of experienced retired homicide investigators from different parts of the country did an independent research study and revisited the evidence found at the crime scene. This included interviews with the original investigating detectives and evidence collection technicians. They went as far as creating a mockup of the family room and kitchen where the incidents occurred and followed the blood trail, or blood map and walked through each step of the evidence. Although their motives for Darlie committing the murders differed slightly, they unanimously agreed that there was no doubt in their minds that Darlie Routier alone committed the murders based only on the evidence found at the scene. Each investigator also agreed that they felt Darin Routier had some post-murder involvement in covering up what Darlie had done.
The investigative team met with Charlie Samford, the juror that Darlie supporters always make mention of in reference to his doubts regarding Darlie's guilt, particularly in reference to the bruise photos of Darlie. He had stated publicly that if he had seen the photos in court, that he would have voted not guilty. They presented their conclusions to Mr. Samford and explained methodically how they came about them. Mr Samford said that the prosecution hadn't explained the evidence in the detail that they had and he recanted his feelings on Darlie being innocent.
Most likely no one will ever know what the exact causes and contributing factors were for Darlie Routier to decide to murder her children outside of Darlie herself and probably Darin. It could have been a combination of postpartum depression, the financial strains, or maybe the increasing bickering with Darin. It would seem that something reached the boiling point that got her to tell Darin that she wanted a divorce that night. (which she conveniently neglected to tell investigators about)
Darlie's friend Basia (Barbara Jovel) stated in a 2016 YouTube interview that Darlie and Darin had been fighting every day for weeks over the money situation before the murders. Darlie even told her housekeeper the day of the murders,"There's going to be a big fight tonight." Evidently this "big fight" did take place and it ended up with Darlie telling Darin she wanted a divorce and her two sons being savagely murdered.
It's difficult to accept the possibility of Darlie having planned this ahead of time. Like she woke up on June 5th and thought to herself "Well, tonight's the night I'm going to kill the boys." This appears to be more of a sudden anger-induced sporadic reaction more than anything else; a crime of opportunity. Darlie just didn't possess the smarts to have planned this ahead of time. This author believes in the strong possibility that Darin may have called Darlie's bluff when she asked for a divorce. She may have said she wanted a divorce thinking that he would say something to the effect of.."No Darlie, please..we can work this out..." While in actuality after being fed up with her nonstop complaining about the money, he may have said "Fine, I agree, let's do it, pack up your stuff in the morning and get out...." Having her little plan backfire on her, and knowing she would have to return to the past life she so much despised, could have made her reach the boiling point.
Darin eventually goes upstairs to go to bed and Darlie stayed downstairs in the family room with the boys. Perhaps she just laid there on the couch stewing over the fight they had just had. She may have gotten more and more upset thinking about what Darin had said and somehow justified in her mind that her two oldest boys were the source of her problems. She could have lost control of herself and in a blind fury stabbed Damon and Devon to death. Some people have suggested that she may have originally decided to kill her children and herself but "chickened out" at the last minute from killing herself, or Darin woke up from the noise of her killing the boys and stopped her before she was able to kill herself.
Some of Darlie's blood was discovered on the couch, she may have done the chest or arm cut on herself on the couch (possibly even at Darin's suggestion) to stage the "intruder attack at the couch" story, and then proceeded to the sink to perform her neck wound so she would be close to a towel and a water source to control the bleed. She seemed to think that water was like a hemostatic agent and would stop bleeding, as she testified when falsely describing putting wet towels on the boys. It's also important to note that insurance records on the boys and her handwritten will were found at the foot of the couch by investigators.
The one thing this author can't get away from is the possibility and likelihood of Darin Routier's involvement. I firmly do not believe that Darin was in anyway involved in the actual murder of his two son's or that he even suspected Darlie would do such a thing, but I tend to lean toward the possibility of Darin directing the scene staging and concocting the intruder theory to keep Darlie from going to jail. With Darlie's emotions as they were after the boys were killed, I have trouble accepting Darlie's ability to think clearly enough to do much scene staging on her own. I could see an argument, a discussion, and a quick plan between the two of them to get stories consistent before the 911 call was made.
It all would have had to happen quickly considering the fact that Damon was still alive when EMS and law enforcement arrived. Darin could have given her a story to tell the police about waking up on the couch to an intruder attacking her, but again, with her state of mind at this moment she would have been upset, scared, confused, and half listening to him, which could explain the 5 different intruder stories she later gave police and prosecutors.
This theory has merit based on Darlie's own account of the events. She said after she chased the supposed intruder and he escaped through the garage window, she came back in the TV room, saw the boys, realized she too was injured, screamed for Darin and immediately dialed 911. That entire process could take 5 minutes maybe less. Officer Waddel had a 3 minute response time, that puts us into 8 minutes since the backyard motion-sensor would have been triggered by the intruder running through the yard. As mentioned previously, the backyard spa had two 150 watt motion-activated lights on it that were pointed directly toward the house (and the garage window) and illuminated the entire backyard. Waddel testified that he immediately looked in the door of the garage when he arrived and there were no lights on in the garage or the back yard. Investigators said that once triggered, those lights would stay on for 18 minutes. They should have still been on when Waddel arrived. Darin and Darlie could have easily concocted a story to tell the police and rapidly staged the scene before she dialed 911.
The forensic pathologist that conducted the autopsy's on the boys testified that from the nature of the wounds and the force that was used, that it appeared to have been done by someone in a fit of rage. Obviously, a lot more occurred between Darin and Darlie that night than either one of them cared to tell investigators about.
This was a very disturbing case and an emotional case. It's difficult to accept that a mother could possibly do this to her children. Seeing all the video interviews of Darlie Routier, the home movies, the photos of her with the boys smiling and seemingly happy, makes it's hard to understand what drove her to committing such an unspeakable act. She obviously loved them and cared for them up to a point where some unexplained psychological breakdown occurred and she snapped. As difficult as it is emotionally to accept this, the forensic evidence cannot be ignored. With the 2015 DNA results, it just all the more confirms that there is not one shred of evidence to show that an intruder came in the house or that the only other person in the house, Darin Routier, was responsible for murdering his sons. The physical evidence found at the scene of the crime, points to no one else but Darlie Routier. It did at the conclusion of the trial and still does today.
I have to agree with author Don Davis' conclusions of the trial. Darlie's attorney, Doug Mulder, should never have allowed her to testify, She destroyed what little credibility she had on the stand and her backpedaling, illogical testimony, and her constant replies of "I don't know, I don't remember" had a profound impact on the jury. She literally sealed her own fate on the witness stand. What Darlie told police investigators and the prosecutors in court simply did not match the crime scene. Mulder should have advised her not to even attempt to argue with prosecutor Toby Shook, a skilled and experienced attorney trained to take apart a witness on the stand; especially when that witness is the defendant. Darlie's attorneys should never have allowed her to write letters from jail discussing the case. Those letters were the icing on the cake for the prosecution to show that Darlie had lied. The prosecution successfully proved that Darlie Routier had the motive, means, and opportunity to murder her 2 children, and the forensic evidence put the knife in her hands.
After the 2015 DNA results came back, Darlie has refused requests for interviews. Darlie Kee and Darin appeared in the June, 2018 ABC documentary: The Last Defense. Neither one provided any new information or any new evidence contrary to the original guilty verdict 25 years ago.
I was there from the beginning to the end of that nightmare and although I believed her at first, it wasn't until the middle of the trial that I realized she did it. Then it all fell in to place and made sense. She's guilty and I've been shunned from the family for saying it and believing. You can't be part of the clan and be against Darlin. [sic]
— A close relative (Name withheld by request)
DARLIE ROUTIER TODAY
Darlie Lynn Routier is currently on death row at the Mountain View Prison Unit, Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice, in Gatesville, Texas, after being convicted of murdering her youngest son, 5-year old Damon.
She was also charged with Devon's murder but not tried by the prosecution for two reasons. First, in the State of Texas, a murder conviction of a child under the age of 6 carries an automatic death penalty. And second, the prosecution felt that if for some reason she was found not guilty of murdering Damon, they would charge her with Devon's murder.
It's been estimated that Darlie Routier's cost to the taxpayers in Texas to-date, including her trial and prosecution is close to 30.5 million. The average cost to house a death row inmate in Texas is close to $1.8 million/year
(Source: Texas Department of Criminal Justice)
With the 2015 DNA results and denied state appeals, Darlie is quickly running out of options and time. The state of Texas allows three appeals for retrial. She's lost her direct appeal to the state and she lost her writ appeal to the state. Her third appeal has moved to the federal level with the U.S. District Court in San Antonio, which is her last option. Supposedly more DNA testing occurred in 2018. The federal court judge has not yet ruled on those DNA results. If the judge denies further motions from Darlie Routier's attorney, then that court will go ahead and set a date for execution.
Even if by some remote chance Darlie won an evidentiary hearing and was granted a new trial for Damon's murder, the District Attorney could charge her with Devon's murder.
I think if I live to be a hundred, I wouldn't be able to tell you everything that happened that night. - Darlie Routier (From a post-conviction prison interview)
Interestingly, the same words spoken by surviving 2nd Officer Charles Lightoller of the RMS Titanic in 1912.
Darlie's Infamous Graveside Silly String Birthday Party
“When I’m in the courtroom I am bound by certain things. I’m also bound rules of evidence and procedure. The Routier family is not bound by any of that. For 25 years they’ve been free to make whatever claim they want to; to distort the evidence any way they want to. I’ve heard those claims about fingerprints…They failed to back those claims up. I’ve heard claims about DNA, and they don’t back those claims up. About every five years there’s another “new” unexplained claim that comes from the family, but they never ever produce any evidence that undermines that jury’s verdict in the case.”
Greg Davis, Lead prosecutor, Darlie Routier murder trial
“It was one of the most brutal murders I’ve ever been involved with, it stands out because of the brutality of those little boys who were murdered in such a cold-blooded fashion by their mother. That’s something you’re never going to forget.
The best evidence we had in the case was Routier herself, she gave about seven different stories about what happened. Her story changed constantly with whoever she would talk to and her various accounts never matched the evidence found at the crime scene.
I think obviously if you’re found guilty of murdering your children that the [death] penalty is a deserving sentence, and she’s exactly where she should be, I think as soon as the federal appeal is over, the sentence will be upheld and the sentence will be carried out.”
Toby Shook, one of the prosecutors on the case, said nothing has happened in the past two decades to make him doubt the jurors decision to convict Routier.
“It really doesn’t pay to put on a documentary 25 years later to show someone’s guilty,” Shook said. “Darlie Routier testified and she was caught in a bunch of lies, she wound up being our best witness to prove her guilt with the lies that she was caught in.”
Toby Shook, Prosecutor, Darlie Routier murder trial
UPDATE September 2021
On April 28, 2021, New York based Innocence Project attorney, Vanessa Potkin, filed and was granted a Pro Hac Vice motion with Criminal District Court No. 3 in Dallas County TX, by Judge Audra Riley. Pro Hac Vice is the court allowing an attorney who doesn't live, work, or conduct regular business in a given state to represent a client there.
Back in 1998, The Center for Wrongfully Convicted at Blhum Legal Clinic, part of Northwestern University's School of Law looked into the Routier case. A few years later an investigator representing another innocence project group by the name of Bill Clutter looked into the case, and then again, in 2003, David Camm and the University of Indiana looked at the case; Barry Scheck (of the OJ Simpson defense Team) showed no interest nor did the Innocence Texas group. (Their director, Mike Ware, thought she was guilty)
The problem these groups consistently run into is the evidence that convicted Darlie Routier. The facts of the case and physical evidence that linked her to the murders simply cannot be changed.
The defense attorney's / Innocence groups always seem to boil their hopes on the same two issues, the "mysterious" unidentified fingerprint known as "85-J." (thought to belong to one of the boys due to it's small size) and the blood splatter evidence. They appear to be keeping quiet about their investigation. No word yet as of September 2021, so it's been over three years now.
Reportedly "COVID 19 Slowing Things Down"
Altoona (TX) Mirror July 2021,
"Within the past year, a Dallas County judge ordered the prosecution to permit inspection of its files on the case by Routier’s team of defense attorneys.
The status report, prepared by Smith, indicated a hearing in Dallas County on the Routier case had been tentatively scheduled for this week, but “the COVID-19 pandemic has led to its postponement.”
Due to the pandemic, Smith stated, it is unlikely the hearing will be rescheduled “for the immediate future.”
It also was reported that two dozen boxes of the prosecution files on the case have been reviewed by the defense team, which includes representatives of the Innocence Project of New York.
Because of the new evidence gleamed from the DNA testing and the prosecution files, an amended habeas corpus petition will be filed in the state court, the status report indicated.
Meanwhile, the defense team has asked that a federal public defender be appointed to aid with the Routier case if it ever makes it to the federal level.
Dallas attorney J. Stephen Cooper requested the naming of a new federal defense attorney because one of Routier’s counsel, Lauren E. Schmidt, accepted another job.
U.S. District Judge Fred Biery recently named Jeremy Schepers of the federal public defender’s Capital Habeas Corpus Unit for the Northern District of Texas as Schmidt’s replacement.
While there has been a lot of activity in the past year concerning the Routier case, nothing has occurred concerning defense efforts to move the post conviction proceedings through the court system, Cooper said.
He said there has been “just a tiding-up” of the evidence.
People who wish to post comments here are welcome to do so whether you agree with the guilty verdict or not. We'd like to have your thoughts and opinion.
PERSONAL ATTACKS ON OTHER PEOPLE DUE TO A DIFFERENCE IN OPINION WILL NOT BE TOLERATED AND THE COMMENT WILL NOT BE POSTED.
© 2016 SClemmons
Jay Strange on August 28, 2020:
As a long time believer that Darlie could not commit this act, I am now on the states side. I appreciate the time you put into piecing all of this together!
Suzie from Carson City on May 02, 2020:
Hi Folks.......I must confess, It took me L O N G time & volumes of reading and even more soul-searching to finally arrive at accepting that Darlie is guilty. Even then, it was quite difficult & broke my heart.
Of course I know it is the "mother" in me that kept holding onto futile hope. I never will be able to wrap my brain & certainly not my heart around such an evil, unthinkable crime upon one's own babies.
There simply can be no understanding this and for the life of me, I cringe at the thought.
Those darling, precious boys..................:( Peace, Paula
Magpie 9 on May 01, 2020:
Etbaker: Thats one of rhise myths startex by Darlie's family and occasionally parroted by her cult members. You dont hear it often anymore because it's been replaced by the more plausible, but equally bogus, explsnation that it is cross-contaminarion from fingerprinting the knife block.
etbaker43 on April 29, 2020:
Very good read. Thank you, SClemmons, for your work. I have something for your "Ridiculous Things That Darlie Supporters Say" file. While discussing the case on Quora with a seemingly intelligent fellow (good spelling, grammar, superficially adequate knowledge of the case), I brought up the bread knife with the microscopic fibers that match the garage window screen. He came back with "The fibers on the knife weren't from the screen. They were from A TWIST TIE FROM A LOAF OF FRENCH BREAD (emphasis mine) which is identical to the material the screen is made of. She used the the knife to cut the twist tie and then cut French bread." After I finished laughing, I explained that 1) twist ties are made from wire encased in paper or plastic, which are NOT materials used to make window screens, and 2) people don't cut twist ties, they un-twist them so they can be used again. Never heard back from the fellow. Too bad; he seemed nice.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on April 22, 2020:
Hi Jack, and thanks for your comment.
You may be right, and that's a good point. Darin would have had but a couple of minutes to concoct a plan prior to police arrival. He's seems like pretty cool cucumber as well as calculating, so who knows.
Jack Staunton on April 21, 2020:
Awesome article on the case, SClemmons. Probably the best one out there. I just read it for a second time. I first came across it over a year ago and actually got banned from one of her support pages on Facebook for posting the link! Typically amusing, but not at all surprising.
I do, however, disagree with you on one thing. I don't believe Darin immediately helped Darlie stage the scene and concocted the intruder story for her. If he had any love for his sons at all, he wouldn't have been in a clear enough state-of-mind to stage the scene and come up with a story to tell the police. I have no doubts that he was accusing her in the 911 call based on what Darlie is saying to him, and I think that suggests a feeling of disgust and betrayal from his end. I believe the immediate emotion and shock would've been too much to overcome in such a short time to start covering for her at that point (even five minutes would be too soon). To me, he genuinely sounded devastated on the 911 call. That's just my opinion though. You may be right...
We know Darlie is the murderer and that there was no intruder, but there are some parts of the case such as Darin's level of involvement and what exactly was said between the two of them before he went upstairs, where we will never get the full picture. Either way, I don't know who'd have any sympathy for Darin after lying his ass off for 24 years to protect the murderer of his sons.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on April 16, 2020:
Sscott1101: Thanks for commenting. Her testimony most likely hastened the trial and the deliberation time of the jury, but the evidence alone had her convicted with or without her testimony.
Sscott1101 on April 14, 2020:
Does anyone think she would of been found not guilty if she hadn’t of testified?
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on February 04, 2020:
Hey there Magpie 9,
Thanks for commenting again. Actually Ms Adams accused the prosecution of trying to change her account of what Darlie told her. Fortunately, Toby Shook had other people in the conference room where she was being interviewed and everyone in the room said Shook did not do that. That's the very reason you have other people in the room in an interview with a potential witness in a legal case.
I also think there may have been a bit of a language barrier problem there.
Magpie 9 on February 01, 2020:
Darlies friend Mercedes said that Darlie told her she woke up to find the intruder straddling her. The Defense tried to get her to change her account to the intruder was on Darlies legs, but Mercedes refused to change her story, after which she was dropped from testifying.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 30, 2020:
Hi there and thank you for commenting on the article, I appreciate that. You got me curious about Malignant Narcissism disorder. I've done a light light reading on the topic and you're right, many of the characteristics and signs and symptoms could be applicable to Darlie and explain her actions.
I'm no psychologist either and it would be cool to hear some comments from someone that is.
Again, thank you for commenting!
FrancineApp99 on January 30, 2020:
Hi, I enjoyed your article very much. Besides being well written, it was factual. I have read the trial transcript, so I have seen the truth with my own eyes.
I find it laughable that people watch Dateline or some other t.v. show and then have a strong opinion as to a person's guilt or innocence, like now they know every detail.
I think it is the emergence of social media that makes people so aggressive as to their viewpoint and the need to share it with everyone. I don't understand people being so mean and destructive against people with a differing viewpoint. This is so true in the political forum, also.
I found your article as I was searching, "Why hasn't Darlie Routier been executed yet?" I read so much online about how she's innocent. It is rare to read something factual that reinforces the evidence, probably because people are so vicious toward this viewpoint (the truth).
I liked your portion about possible motive. I am not a psychologist, but I have heard about a condition called "Malignant Narcissism." I was wondering if Darlie was feeling like it was becoming not all about her, so she wanted to make it that way. On the other hand, your possible motive probably makes more sense. We probably will never know. We probably will never know about Darin's involvement, either.
Anyway, keep up the good work, and I'm sorry that you've had to endure persecution for just stating the facts. Thank you.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on November 19, 2019:
It’s quite presumptuous of you to assume you know things about me and how I handled the research of my article considering we’ve never met or spoken before and you don’t know the first thing about me. But, despite your typical “Darlie supporter” bitterness and attempts at insulting someone who opposes your views, I’m going to break my own rules and answer your questions regarding what you call, the “absurdity” of my article.
In reference to “…you make it sound like everyone who looks at crime cases only know how to watch YouTube videos,” that comes from a consensus of 3 years of comments on this HubPage from readers who support Darlie Routier and by their own admission, both refer to and quote information they retrieved from YouTube videos they’ve watched. With most of them I inquired as to whether or not they actually had read the trial transcripts to which the majority of them admitted they had not.
With regard to your comments suggesting the incompetence of David Nabors, I would think it would be fair for me to assume that you sir, are a certified crime scene analyst with several years of experience that puts you in a position to criticize his procedures and contradict his expert opinion of what is an attempt at wiping up blood versus a simple smear? You say there’s no evidence to support this; while on the contrary there’s nothing but evidence to support this.
You mention lack of evidence with screen rod fibers and glue on the bread knife, the splatter evidence from the utility room, again, the evidence is there. You can argue it all you want, but the physical evidence will not go away and it cannot be denied.
And these things you bring up are relatively minuscule in comparison to the blood and DNA evidence, the splatter on her nightshirt, the blood drops around the two boys on the carpet, her being caught in lies on the witness stand, her ever changing multiple accounts of what occurred on the night of the murders.
Sorry Mr. Phillips, but I stand by my own personal opinion along with the opinion of the prosecution and the decision of the jury.
Bernard Phillips on November 18, 2019:
You make it sound like everyone who looks at crime cases only know how to watch youtube videos. We all read and study transcripts, read newspaper articles and TV news footage too. We investigated exactly the same way you did, and perhaps we've done more investigation than you, you're not special.
The whole article is generally absurd.
Here's a question. You make the claim (you're really only repeating the psychobabble of David Nabors) that Darlie cleaned up two footprints. Do you know how absurd that claim is? How would anyone know if Darlie cleaned up two footprints if she wiped them clean and all that's left for the luminol to show is a smear?
There is no evidence that she did this. The states case is weaker than weak. Bevel and Linch are two con artists, just read the transcripts (I doubt you actually did). Put their testimony in a timeline. They are liars and con artists. There was no fiberglass rod on the breadknife. Bevel looked for knife patterns on the utility room floor, but Darlie said the knife was laying outside of the utility room. It was a railroad job from the minute Cron walked into the crime scene.
Melly Mel Mel on November 01, 2019:
This is a fantastic presentation of facts. Thank you for taking the time to present this thorough examination of the case. If anyone considers the simple logic surrounding the facts, it’s clear she was the only killer. The cut screen alone is the most ridiculous thing I read. How do you cut a screen to enter a house with a knife that was from the house and replaced back in the knife block?! Lack of bloody footprints from the killer..eesh if it doesn’t make sense, it’s not true. I’m curious to see how the innocence project handles this case. Hopefully they realize quickly that she’s a liar and a murderer and they use their precious resources for people that are ACTUALLY innocent.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on September 06, 2019:
You're right, I'm not going to post your cynical hate filled comments on this HubPage. I cannot discuss issues of this case with you in a calm rational fashion without you lashing back with personal insults, inappropriate language, and posting false accusations on other blogs and YouTube sites. That is the precise reason why I blocked you from this Hub over a year ago.
Suzie from Carson City on May 17, 2019:
SClemmons.... I must say, no one is more surprised than I am to find myself here, bearing some news......recently off the press. I'm trying to get this to as many individuals that I'm aware have a strong interest in this case. I'm eager to read the reactions and thoughts so we can exchange & discuss!
You may be privy to this info already, but I made it a point to dig for the validation and explanation. Be chatting with you soon! Paula
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on May 12, 2019:
Thank you and good question you asked. There was only one motion sensor in the back yard mounted about 6 feet up on a front corner post of the hot tub spa facing the rear of the house. (Since removed by new owners) It was tested by forensic investigators to see if there were any "blind" spots in the back yard and if someone could have come through or exited the back door or garage window without triggering it; none were found.
That being said, the person that planted the sock would have had to have gone out the front door and around the house to avoid setting it off. Which makes sense if Darlie did it on two counts, first, she knew she would have had trouble opening and closing the faulty back gate that dragged the ground, and two, she wouldn't have wanted to trigger the light and draw attention to herself by neighbors close by.
MattC44 on May 10, 2019:
This is a valuable resource you've complied. Well researched, well done. I'm in the Darlie's guilty camp. The evidence all points to her, and nothing shows there's an intruder. I have a question you can likely answer.
Assuming it was Darlie who placed the sock, would she have had to go out of the front door to avoid the motion detectors, or is there a back door that provides a path around the sensors?
Regardless, I don't find a round trip of 150 yards would take much time at all for a 26 y/o woman with adrenaline pumping. Just curious.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on October 12, 2018:
Thank you Paula for your comments and your gracious insight. I really enjoy your articles as well.
Suzie from Carson City on August 30, 2018:
SClemmons......Whew! This is some lengthy, seriously researched article. Thought I'd never reach the end. However, I am grateful for such a detailed account with actual information from the trial transcripts and investigator's reports.
It's been much too long I have anguished over this case, vacillating my beliefs from one side to the other to something else altogether! To say the least I have been so conflicted since originally delving into this case, I promised myself I would steer clear of any more news articles, TV shows, online information or books written on this topic.
So glad I allowed myself to read your outstanding article. What I appreciate most is that you have reported in a fair & factual manner, pretty much avoiding too much personal "opinion." I think I may have read some of your comments on Jackie Linley's work on this very case. It may have been somewhere else, but your profile looks familiar to me...
True confession: I have finally been able to come to terms with my inability to take a firm stand. I am aware that through all of my attempts to come to a firm decision, my common sense & logic fought fiercely with my heart......Intellect vs. emotion, so to speak. My true, impartial understanding of all that is in this report you have presented, tells me that there simply can be no reasonable doubt Darlie was justly & fairly convicted of the heinous murder of her precious babies. Even as I write this, the mother in me (which is literally my entire being!) experiences such sadness, denial and pain, I could scream from the bottom of my soul.
You have steered me in the direction I continuously had been pulled toward yet kept fighting with a tightly-closed mind. It's just so very difficult to believe this....I cannot conceive of this monstrous act......by a mother, for the Love of God!! WHY? HOW could she have done this?. So much of your article was extremely difficult and heart-wrenching for me to read. Further, I can't bring myself to look at pictures of those gorgeous little Angels while knowing they are gone, that their own mother took their lives and in such an egregious incomprehensible way.
On a very personal note, I am not completely in favor of the death penalty. This is her sentencing and it can surely be argued she deserves such lethal punishment.....I am of the belief that natural life in prison w/o the possibility of parole (especially because it is Darlie) would be a far worse price for her to pay. But, that's not for us to decide.
It will take some time now for my mixed emotions to settle.....in one way, I feel a sense of relief that I finally know Darlie is guilty & I don't need to obsess over this case for another day. On the other hand, I will always hope that some crazy glitch appears out of nowhere and some stranger steps forward to confess to having committed this crime and can take us through that evening step by step, minute by minute and tell the world WHY.
There is no random stranger. I know this. I just can't explain how very hard it is for ME to accept such insanity carried out by a mother. I'll have a good cry and fall asleep I hope.......Peace, Paula
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on August 28, 2018:
I can't help you make that decision, that's entirely up to you. Although, you seem pretty convinced as to her guilt from what you commented about here. I didn't see mention of your having read the trial transcripts. I strongly recommend that you read them in their entirety. That might give you added insight when trying to form an opinion.
my everything on August 27, 2018:
i came across this blog after watching the tv show last defense. this blog put me ahead of the show with the details. its hard for me not to vote her guilty based on your evidence alone.
from the tv show i was looking for you to speak about the written statement darlin made. well you did and then some more. 1)darlin stated that her child woke her up saying mommy, mommy. then she saw the man leaving the living room. Other Version. the man was at her feet when she woke up......2)no bruises on her arm while at the hospital. Other version. your pictures of big bruising on arm after she went home. 3)no knife blood spatter when knife dropped.4) her blood in kitchen sink per your blog. 5) wet towels per your blog. only contained her blood and not used to aid the children. 6)not sure if blood on kitchen flood is only darlins. however not smeared from walking/running over it. 7) not enough for me to say if darin was involved. 8) never knew about dog til your blog. wow he should have made some marks on the floor too unless he was kept upstairs behind closed doors.9)what mother would not to be around her infant son? darlin can sleep through attack on sons but cant sleep through a baby tossing? 10) darlins statements afterwards about mess in house to clean up, money from life insurance and her diary. 11) her polygraph test. 12)darins polygraph test 13) the 911 call. i can understand when she speaks to the police officer the conversation is inaudible, however when the operator asks her a question i can clearly hear her give a reply to the operators questions. 14) the screen falls open as though it was cut from the inside
wow. just wow.
help me come to the right verdict please. based on the above findings should i vote guilty or not guilty?
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on August 10, 2018:
Wanttobeleive, I'm curious as well, what do you think the defense didn't have time to prepare for. How do you think the outcome would have been different?
luo xiao min from California on August 09, 2018:
Wanttobelieve, with all due respect (i really mean it). IF the defense had the time that you claim they didnt have, exactly WHAT EVIDENCE of innocence they'd come up with to secure the "different outcome" you predicted?
Wanttobelieve on August 08, 2018:
SClemmons- "It is all in how you tell your story....just tell the story right". Wow, you should write crime books. You completely created a narrative about a fight, divorce, money problems, Darin helping her cover the crime (didn't the police and DA he was not involved). When you put information together, read articles, watch Youtube, pick a part information. Then you can CREATE ANY STORY you want. I have worked in the legal system for over 20 years, and trust me it takes more than 6 months to prepare for a death penalty case. These attorneys were rushed, because the State needed a SLAM DUNK quick. If the defense was allowed the proper time to prepare, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A DIFFERENT OUT COME.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on July 18, 2018:
Error noted and corrected, thank you for pointing that out.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on July 08, 2018:
Hi again Cami,
Thanks for saying that. I don't get on those Facebook groups much. That's nice to know.
Mrsdoubt on July 07, 2018:
It's me Cami...just wanted you to know that the Facebook pages are hopping after The Last Defense series...some posters have picked up your blog and everyone is commenting what a great blog it is, well researched and factual. Everyone but the Darlie supporters of course. The show was a travesty of lies and editing. Shame on Viola Davis for choosing Darlie Routier to feature. If anyone is guilty as sin it's Darlie. Cheers!
ABS410 on July 07, 2018:
I know that’s the part that I wish there was an explanation for
Another thing that really bothers me is that Darin had his jeans on, I know at first he said he didn’t but he also said he never left the scene and when the policeman showed up he had his jeans on. I don’t think he’d sleep in jeans and if you hear panic (especially if it involves your family) in your home you won’t take time to dress at least I don’t think you would instinct would be to run help
Thank you for your condolences
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on July 07, 2018:
ABS410, thank you for your comments.
I'm sorry to hear about the tragedy that you and your family went through and you made a very good point; people react to disaster and tragedy in different ways. Working in emergency medical service for 30 years I've seen it firsthand.
However, when it comes to this case, Darlie Routier wasn't convicted solely on how she reacted to the deaths of her children, she was convicted on forensic evidence that directly connected her to the murder weapon and the actual act of murdering her children.
In post-conviction interviews with jurors they stated that the “silly-string video” alone was not the driving force behind their decision. Along with the physical evidence, her changing stories and proven lies played a significant role in their guilty verdict.
ABS410 on July 06, 2018:
Great article with good information. When this happened I thought she was guilty but my brother died suddenly in 2002, it wasn't a brutal murder and he was 24 but he was a healthy in shape man with absolutely nothing wrong him who went to work at 8:00 on a Wednesday morning and was dead by 10:00 that morning with no warning at all. It was very traumatic, so after going through something so traumatic and watching my parents especially my mom I can't criticize Darlie much. I'm not saying some things aren't strange but my mom didn't remember anything at all from the hospital when she was told my brother had died and I am an extremely emotional person and I couldn't cry I was in shock I kept telling the preacher I didn't know why I couldn't cry and I felt like I wasn't even walking on the ground. My brother who is very strong completely broke down and couldn't even remember how to get from his work to my moms house. Everyone thought our reactions would have been the opposite. My tears came 2 days later. Two weeks after he died was my brothers birthday and my mom said we were all taking balloons to cemetery to release so we did and it was actually peaceful and felt good to honor him. We were in no way excited we were still struggling to find a new normal in our lives.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on July 06, 2018:
fedematias95, the link definitely works I tried it on my computer at work. You might want to try it on another machine.
fedematias95 on July 05, 2018:
That's weird: "404--File not found." Is there any way you can download the PDF and send it to my email? Sorry for the inconvenience.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on July 05, 2018:
fedematias, the link worked fine when I tried it just now. This is the address:
fedematias95 on July 05, 2018:
Looks like the link to the 2015 DNA test results doesn't work. Do you have the PDF document? If so, would you send it to me? Thank you!
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on June 30, 2018:
I'm glad you obtained some additional insight from the article. I put a considerable amount of research into it. I hope your sister finds it useful as well. Thanks for commenting.
annalis981 on June 29, 2018:
I am so very happy I stumbled upon this article shortly after I was introduced to the existence of the case! My sister obviously intrigued by the current ABC series, will get so caught up in the thrill of it as we all do. Then fall into the endless debate over aspects of all sides. When in fact there in this case is Zero aspect for the defense at all! It is all right there in plain.
So well written. Laid out in perfect order. Perfect amount of cocky when necessary. So properly factual that you feel comfortably safe believing every word written.
... So I send the link to my lil sis whom would have spent the next year and accasionally forever watching YouTube vids. Failing to recognize the clarity that this read provides.
Tonight we share a cig between our homes with our babies safe inside. We discuss what would actually be just punishment for this Bitch. We shake our heads in sadness over even wondering what the motive could be.
Thank you SClemmons for this greatly written article! I can't wait to tackle the newly posted one, JFK.
Is there a link to more of your writings?
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on June 29, 2018:
Avery Dai Lyfe, I agree with you 100%. I couldn't have said it better. Thanks for your comments!
Avery Dai Lyfe on June 28, 2018:
I wholeheartedly agree with the guilty verdict. Although it was difficult to find motive, I dare not question evil acts. The involvement of the diary and it's apologetic context I interpret as homicidal thoughts and not that of suicidal as many may have believed. As for the actual murders; simply a window of opportunity fueled by a fit of rage towards her husband that night.
There is no way she could have committed suicide. Besides being a coward she is narcissistic maybe even sociopathic. Take her superficial injuries, injury locations, and her continuance superficial upkeep in prison for instance. What also came to mind is that Darlie's behavior during and after the murders was the affect of her adrenaline rush. What are your thoughts on these theories SClemmons?
luo xiao min from California on June 23, 2018:
Reading through the comments is a jaw-dropping and sickening expenerience to me. Today, 22 years after this heinous crime, and 20 years after the trial in which overwhelming damning evidence were presented to a jury, examed tested debated by the jury, ... yet, 12% of the country's population still believe that Darlier Routier was innocent!
Damn, i thought i wasn't that smart, there's some freaking braindead imbeciles living here, whose only purpose of life is to make me free freeking good about myself. You heard the 911 call, "they came in, stabbed me and my children", then how the hell can you evouen try to suggest that the husband/father did it? The bitch sad "they", said "he" ... the bitch didnt say "my husband"! Get that you fuking imbeciles??? You'd expect a woman would recognize her husband of 10 years wouldn't you???
No offense to the author of this brilliant article, but the Routier double murder is one simple clearcut case, which should be proven by one equation: NO INTRUDER = GUILTY!
And in light of the utter ignorance and idiocy of those DR supporters, all your effort of showing the evidence of guilt fell on deaf ear, or thrown out of window. Those imbeciles they dont want to hear it, all they want to hear/read is their "reasonable doubt", crap like "a botched investigation, ... a framework, ... the unidentified half-size fingerprint ... the silly string, the missing tape showing poor darlie crying me a river".
I can only say that i am just so grateful to Got, down on my knees to thank God that none of these fuking braindead imbeciles served the Routier jury. It send a chill down my spin to imagine that shit happned in that trial. TWO innocent lives lost in a bloody bath people!
Colleen Canada on June 20, 2018:
First and foremost, I want to thank you for incredibly comprehensive and well-written blog about this long-running case.
Being a crime buff, I had obviously watched numerous TV programs about the Routier murders, and was pretty positive she had done it. Granted, I think the earlier programs were slanted more towards her guilt than innocence. However, currently it seems it is “trendy” right now (for lack of a better term, my apologies) to sensationalize such tragedies with the label of wrongly convicted for ratings etc. Don’t get me wrong- I am 100% aware that people get convicted falsely every day and it is a travesty to our justice system and I support any program/blog/book/article that frees such people. But....
I don’t think that’s the case here
As you point out, so much of what we watch or read is often a person’s point of view or created from an agenda. While watching the “Last Defense” last night, I thought to myself-is any of this true?
Ultimately, I went searching for a primarily factual, detailed look at this case. I found a LOT of bias unfortunately. I want to read about all aspects presented without as much prejudice as possible , so I can make a determination for myself about Darlie’s guilt. Your blog has given me that, and now I feel like I can definitively say Darlie Routier is guilty.
What has always fascinated me about these types of murderers is the mask they wear. Darlie viciously stabbed her sons to death in an apparent rage, but was organized enough to cut her throat etc. She absolutely knows what she did, yet can be interviewed numerous times and yet seem convincingly “wronged”. I try to comprehend the exhaustive acting and enormous emotion repression it would take and it makes my head spin..
Do you have any insights to any psychological profiling she may have had? Do you think the state of Texas will eventually execute her, given the high profile exposure her case is getting?
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on June 19, 2018:
Thank you for your comments.
K8isme on June 18, 2018:
I've read up on this case a bit over the years, but the recent Viola Davis show renewed my interest, leading me to this site. I've always wavered back and forth on Darlie's guilt, but this blog sealed it for me. By far, it's the best, most comprehensive breakdown of the case I've ever read. There's no question in my mind now. She's guilty.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on May 29, 2018:
Good to hear from you. Thanks for the information, I was unaware of it.
Mrsdoubt on May 29, 2018:
Hi SClemmons, it's me Cami from Websleuths. Just letting you know ABC doing a program on Darlie on June 12th, hosted by Viola Davis and her husband and titled "the last defense" Darin will be making an appearance on this program. Judging by the preview, they are going just for ratings and sensationalism, incorrect facts already in the preview. Cheers!
fedematias95 on April 08, 2018:
Not at all, LOL. I'm not questioning your sources; and although I miss a sources section, I still think your article is excellent! The reason for that is that I'm doing my own research on the case by reading court transcripts and any other source that could be of help. So that's why I ask for your sources. Please don't think I'm doing this with bad intentions.
Regarding Charles Stamford, I saw a "Dead Again" episode called "Innocence Lost" in which three investigators review the evidence from the crime scene and then explain it to him at the end of it. Maybe the article you read on the Time Magazine was related to the episode. This episode was released in October 23, 2014 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4176956/). Stamford, at the end of the episode, said that he never was explained the evidence that way.
Today, as I was doing some more research on this, I found a video on YouTube of a conversation between a guy who thinks Darlie is guilty and Charles Stamford. This video was published in November 1, 2014. In it, the guy asks Stamford about the way the episode portrayed him (looks like the program portrayed him as if the investigator had changed his mind), and that many supporters were asking themselves whether he had changed his mind about Darlies innocence. Samford made clear that he had not changed his mind, and that he still believes Darlie is innocent. Here's the link to the phone conversation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPlNmdJaq5s
Let me know your thoughts. Have a good day!
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on April 08, 2018:
Fed, I didn't retrieve the 2014 re-investigation story from the Internet, it came from a 2014 Time Magazine article I researched in a library. I'll have to see if I can locate the week it was published, may take a little "time." (no pun intended) BTW, are you questioning my sources? lol
fedematias95 on April 08, 2018:
That explains everything, thank you! Do you have a link to the source about the four experts and the juror changing his mind about Darlie's innocence? Have a good day.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on April 08, 2018:
Hi Fed, I have answer for you. The Episode you refer to in Death Row Stories: Mother V Texas was written in 2013, casted and filmed in 2014 and released in July of 2015. Apparently CNN filmed several episodes simultaneously.
fedematias95 on April 08, 2018:
Another point about the "Mother vs. Texas" episode is that one of the jurors, Charlie Samford, is interviewed. He says there that he now thinks Darlie is innocent.
By the end of your article, you wrote that, in 2014, four retired crime scene experts reviewed all the evidence and concluded without a doubt that Darlie alone murdered Damon and Devon. You also wrote that this evidence was presented to the juror and that he finally changed his mind about Darlie's innocence.
My question is, was he interviewed before the evidence by the four experts was presented to him? Or has he changed his mind again? If I'm not mistaken, the episode was released in 2015, and the evidence reviewed by the experts in 2014. Do you know anything about this?
fedematias95 on April 07, 2018:
I just saw "Death Row Stories" episode "Mother vs. Texas." I'm a little bit disappointed that they didn't deal with the evidence, and focused mainly on the silly string video, and on saying that the video was what convicted her (which isn't true). They also discussed the state's timeline, stating that Darlie wouldn't have had time to stab the children and stage the crime scene before the police and ambulance arrived. But as you say:
"This "time frame" as it's called, didn't begin until the moment Darlie dialed 911. She had all the time in the world prior to dialing 911 to stage the scene at the house, stab the boys, and walk the sock down the alley in an attempt to confuse police and draw attention away from herself."
Kathy Cruz pointed out that, according to trial transcripts, one of the doctors said that Damon would have lived a few minutes after the stab wounds, and that therefore, he wouldn't have been alive when the ambulance arrived (you would also have to add Darlie staging the scene, so that would make the timeline even more impossible). But that assumes that Damon was stabbed four times at the same time. He could have been, let's say, stabbed one or two times, and then two other times just before calling 911 (or during the 911 call).
This is a portion of the trial in which Davis questions Dr. Parchman:
DAVIS: Can you give us an estimate of how long this child might have lived if, say, stab wound 1 had been inflicted and then the other three were inflicted sometime later on?
PARCHMAN: What we're talking about, a few to several more minutes.
DAVIS: Okay. Can you give us a ballpark figure of an outside time period there?
PARCHMAN A few to several more minutes.
DAVIS: Okay. And, how many minutes did you say that this child could have lived if all four of them had been produced at the same time?
PARCHMAN: A few minutes.
Let me know your thoughts about the episode. Have a good day!
Everton on April 06, 2018:
Anita, I think what you call "hate" would more accurately be described as shock, dismay, and disgust.
Shocked by your desire to defend a rightfully convicted BABY KILLER.
Dismay, that you seem unwilling to even show a half-hearted attempt at applying logic to what is so obvious.
And disgust by your carefree accusations of strangers killing children without reasonable evidence. While simultaneously ignoring strong evidence against the only adult in the room with BLOOD ALL OVER HER SHIRT AND FINGERPRINTS ALL OVER THE MURDER WEAPON!!
It is beyond frustrating. Satin is not responsible for killing those children. Darlie Routier IS!!!!!
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on April 06, 2018:
I apologize for that happening and that you feel that way. I'm by no means defending anyone here, but I do know its difficult to discuss a murder case involving children without emotions coming into play.
A lot of people that comment on this Hub believe without question that Darlie Routier murdered her children. Anytime someone questions that or the evidence, people are quick to pounce. The same thing happens on the Darlie support sites, I've been literally roasted on a few support sites for expressing my belief in Darlie's guilt.
Please don't take it personally, and again I apologize that this happened to you. I invite your comments at any time and I'll try to monitor a little closer if anything sounds like a personal attack on someone else.
Anita Hasch from Port Elizabeth on April 06, 2018:
I rest my case. Just can't understand the hate in these comments. Always amazes me when people can't discuss anything rationally but carry on as if they are half demented. Plse don't bother answering as I prefer to look on the bright side of life. Any parent that has lost a child will suffer for the rest of their lives. If she is the cause of the childrens death her suffering will be worse. I can't imagine any mother doing something like that. However, there was a case here a few years ago of a grown man that sexually assaulted a little boy of six and then killed him. Why? in court he said satan told him to do it. The Judge told him, well take satan with you to jail. I will no longer answer any comments.
luo xiao min from California on April 04, 2018:
Anita Hasch, "However, we weren't there, sohow an anybody know what happened"? This statement is oxymoron. IF the world runs on that oxymoron theory, 99% the criminals should never be tried at all, because 99% crime were committed WITHOUT any witness! They're are dumbass. We DON'T have to be physically there to know, it's called INVESTIGATION!!! And we all know what happened, that bitch butchered the two Routier boys.
Just because YOU dont know, doesnt mean we dont know. The cops know based on the evidence they collected that's why they made the arrest, DA's office know based on the evidence produced by the cops that's why they presented the case to a grand jury, evidently the grand jury also know, that's why they brought the charges, the jury know too, that's why they convicted the bitch. The appellant court judges also know, that's why the bitch is still on death row 20 years later!!!
In another word, anybody who has half a brain knows.
Anita Hasch from Port Elizabeth on April 04, 2018:
Hi Everton, Yes this is a very strange case. However, we weren't there, so how can anybody know what happened. Having read the hub twice, I think a third person in the house at the time of the murders is not so far fetched. As far as facts are concerned, was it also not a fact that somebody attacked Darlie. Or was that fact not worth considering. As I don't know these people I can just consider other possibilities.
Everton on April 01, 2018:
For the life of me, I do not understand the need that some people have to look at this case and just invent theories that are not based on the evidence. Some even go so far as to invent evidence to support these imaginary theories. 2nd 3rd and 4th CPRs, cocaine, affairs with the sister, dog's barking and not barking, drugs in Darlie's system that even Darlie did not and DOES NOT claim, and Darlie Kee's betrayal of her daughter are all MADE UP OUT OF THIN AIR. Not one shred of evidence supports ANY of those theories.
Satanist friends? I mean no disrespect, but are you really more persuaded by the idea of a satanic cult being reponsible for these murders than all of the evidence IN THIS ARTICLE? Did you read the article? And after you read it, your takeaway was 'Maybe Satanists did it'???
Am I the only one whose head hurts?
Anita Hasch from Port Elizabeth on April 01, 2018:
A very strange case, that does not make sense. They were both shouting at each other while their children were busy dying. Were they both perhaps intoxicated that they did not realize what was going on.
Who gave the children their names. Did they have friends or family that were Satanists. If that is the case there would be a possibility that they are both innocent as far as killing the children and one of their weird
friends did the deed. Especially as she had wounds as well.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on April 01, 2018:
Thanks for your comments Fedematias95, The source of the information on the brush and screen fibers came from a 60 minutes interview with Det. Jimmy Patterson in more recent years. I'll have to find the exact date of that interview for you.
fedematias95 on March 31, 2018:
Excellent article. I also believe that the evidence clearly points to her guilt. A while ago I began to read "Dateline Purgatory: Examining the Case that Sentenced Darlie Routier to Death" by Kathy Cruz, and wasn't convinced by the points she made. It's good to see that you interacted with her book. Also, you wrote this:
"This was proven not be true though microscopic and chemical analysis. The screen fibers were larger than the fingerprint brush fibers and the screen fibers on the knife contained black rubber and asbestos. The fingerprint brush fibers did not contain any asbestos."
Could you point me to your source for that? I would really appreciate it.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on March 27, 2018:
Noted, thanks for your comment and grammatical observations.
Everton on March 21, 2018:
Are you still arguing with that Darin-did-it conglomerate? Lol. I thought you wrote this brilliant article in response to her Looney Tune nonsense. You dont have to go back and even acknowledge that idiocy. Like Darin Routier, probably one of the dumbest people in Texas based on his actions and willful ignorance, could possibly pull off the "perfect" crime. Utter and complete NONSENSE!!!.
Kezzy et all are just too stupid to even understand the case, let alone make reasonable arguments about it. If she MADE UP OUT OF THIN AIR this drugging theory, or the cocaine MYTH, or the Doug Mulder-was-a-bad-lawyer FAIRY TALE, or the jury-didn't-see-the-pictures LIE, or the Darin-was-never-investigated AESOP FABLE, or ANY one of about 9 other boldface untruths about this case.......why are you surprised that she/they would ascribe a falsehood to a dead journalist at NBC? You know the definition of a crazy person SClemmons. Come on lol. It's a lost cause!
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on March 21, 2018:
It's interesting how Pollyannalana on her Hub keeps saying that the late NBC Night Nightly News corespondent Jessica Savitch (She spells as Jessica Savage) felt that Darlie Routier was innocent. Savitch was killed in a vehicle accident 13 years before the boys were murdered. Good research....
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on March 08, 2018:
Anita, I'm glad you did comment, feel free to continue.
Anita Hasch from Port Elizabeth on March 08, 2018:
Hi SClemmons, First time I heard about this case, I was just commenting in general.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on March 06, 2018:
You’re right, last year Time Magazine listed the top 10 antidepressant med's associated with violence. Some of the most commonly prescribed meds included: fluoxetine (Prozac), sertraline (Zoloft), Paroxetine (Paxil), citalopram (Celexa), escitalopram (Lexapro) and fluvoxamine (Luvox).
However, in this case, Darlie was found not to have any antidepressants in her system when the pre-toxicology screen was conducted prior to cleaning and closing her neck wound. There is no evidence what so ever to support the theory of Darin “drugging” Darlie the night of the murders.
People like to point out Darin’s raising the life insurance amount on Darlie but fail to mention that he raised it on himself as well, to $800,000. Darlie would have actually made out better than Darin if she had killed him. (which she may have planned to do) And, if that were Darin’s intent, or motive, (insurance money) why didn’t he kill her? He sure had the opportunity.
Everton on March 06, 2018:
Darin did NOT DRUG HIS WIFE. Please stop spreading myths about this case!
Anita Hasch from Port Elizabeth on March 06, 2018:
What an awful story. I have noticed that in some murders of children, the mother was on medication for depression. Maybe its time that certain medication for depression gets taken off the market. The fact that her husband increased the value of a life policy on her life, speaks for itself. The have financial problems but he increases the life policy. It wont be the first time a husband drugs his wife.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on February 20, 2018:
Du bist genau richtig. Alle Beweise deuten auf Darlie Routier und niemanden hin.
Danke, dass Sie den Artikel kommentiert haben
Bert2209 on February 20, 2018:
Den Beweisen nach hat Sie es getan. Das sie bestreitet es getan zu haben ist nachvollziehbar denn das wäre Ihr Todesurteil. Auffällig ist für mich die Tatsache daß niergendwo Spuren eines Eindringlins gefunden worden sind. Und die Socke die gefunden wurde könnte theoretisch dort platziert worden sein.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on February 09, 2018:
It ceases to amaze me how certain individuals on the Darlie support sites just keep saying they don't understand how and why Darlie Kee keeps "defending" Darin. Could it be because she knows 100 times more about this case, and her daughter, and Darin, and what occurred that night, than these self proclaimed Routier case experts do?
Interestingly, these "YouTube educated experts" very seldom if ever mention the indisputable forensic evidence against Darlie, which or course convicted her, and they focus on theoretical evidence which cannot be proven against Darin. Evidence which the police and the prosecution found to be non-existent.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 30, 2018:
Everton - You're right she makes these things up in her head and tries to pass them as fact or the result of her supposed "research." This stuff about the mystery car and her theories about CPR, Darin's affair with Darlie's sister..utter nonsense. And I love when she says "I've proven it" Proved it to who?
Well apparently even her own followers are finally starting to realize she's full of it.
Everton on January 30, 2018:
Nothing beats the Darlie-was-drugged theory for me. It is just so arbitrary. ZERO evidence, and even Darlie herself has never made such a claim. Yeah ok, she got so high off of something that she made incriminating statements about her children being murdered right in front of her, AND the aftereffects are still reverberating in her mind that she STILL clings to the statement that she made WHILE she was supposedly "drugged"!!! Literary made up of of THIN AIR.
So I must disagree with you there Sclemmons. Lol
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 30, 2018:
Magpie 9 - That's true, it was just a matter of time. I've been looking at her other Hubs, that is the most ridiculous bunch of made up BS I've ever read, I mean she's really outdone herself and she's getting worse.
Magpie 9 on January 29, 2018:
That was pretty much inevitable
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 28, 2018:
Trouble in paradise on Pollyannalana's site. Looks like the tide has finally turned with Kezzy/mforbes.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 28, 2018:
Thank you Jade.
JadeMarks on January 24, 2018:
Career Criminal...whatever. Anybody that chooses the user name that you chose, on this fourm anyway is a suspected link to the dark side. Those of us on this site devoted to justice for two murdered little boys don’t just smell bullshit a mile away we smell it across country. If you really are a career criminal you would know that those of us that deal with career criminals got more game then you’ll ever have. You think by calling yourself that we’re supposed to believe all that bullshit...? Your “criminal mind profiling” is D game. Miss me with that useless attempt to deflect blame. Darlie wouldn’t take the wrap for her coward husband. Darlie Kee would sell her tainted soul to the devil to get her child killer daughter off death row and no way would she let Darin walk if she thought he did it. Feel free to report back that we’re waiting patiently for the next round of DNA testing to confirm the same shit it’s always confirmed...Darlie Routier is a liar and a killer. SClemmons is a humble person and I respect his web page rules on language. But I’m not a humble person and I’m good with that so let me be CLEAR...Doug Mulder is dead now and that’s a sign that Darlie is circling the drain. Justice is long overdue and they all know it and their desperate. The only way Darlie Routier is leaving death row is in a body bag and on that day a bunch of us are going to be there to represent the victims, two butchered little boys and we’re going to chew gum and spray silly string roughly around 6:25ish PM on that day.
Everton on January 22, 2018:
You are a career criminal huh? Did you even READ this article before you wrote your comment? Each of the points that you raised were addressed in the article. Almost nobody believes the "Intruder" theory for many of the reasons discussed, and ALL (not much, not some, not most) of the evidence inside the house points to Darlie. NOT Darin.
And yet here you come parroting this RIDICULOUS Darlie-was-drugged theory that is supported by ZERO evidence, and nobody on the defense INCLUDING DARLIE has made such a claim in 21 years. Only Jackie Lynnley, Pollyann, and that moron with more names than she has years of formal education keep repeating this MYTH about her being drugged because it is made up out of THIN AIR. Like Poof!
Even you don't have an explanation for why darlie would go to death row just to cover up for her husband: an man who according to YOU just tried to kill her. Utter nonsense!
Now maybe I am just cynical, but I have never seen someone call themself a "career criminal" who goes around revisiting old cases online trying to get somebody else thrown in jail. How did you find this article? And more directly, why are you making general comments about the case RATHER THAN making a comment about the article? You never even read the article most likely. Does not strike me a logical.
So that tells me that this is just another cloak from yet another Darlie fanatic pushing this Darin-did-it fairytale. Nice try
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 22, 2018:
Career Criminal, thank you for your comments, opposing opinions and thoughts are always welcome. For a career criminal you sound as if you're an educated one from the way you write with the prefect punctuation and grammar.
Your theories are sound as far as life insurance being a possible motive, a violent burglar using a gun instead of a knife, and killing the mother first. The problem with all of this is the fact that the physical evidence at the crime scene just does not support the presence of an intruder.
There were no chemicals outside of trace amphetamines found in Darlie's blood, she didn't report feeling hung-over or drowsy when she woke up, she claimed this supposed intruder ran though the kitchen/utility room/garage, yet there were no foot prints/fingerprints to support this having occurred, the 17 minute backyard security light was off when police arrived, the faulty back gate was still closed, etc, etc. There just wasn’t any evidence to suggest anyone besides Darin, Darlie and the boys were in that house when the murders occurred.
I do continue to maintain that Darin had some involvement. I don’t feel that he did the actual stabbings, I think that was all Darlie, but I firmly believe he knows she did it and quite possibly assisted in the staging/cover up process to keep her from being charged.
Career Criminal on January 21, 2018:
I am a career criminal in and out of prisons for nearly 40 years. Currently "out". I can tell you without a doubt Darin Routier is almost certainly the killer in this scenario. Only he made one mistake - he killed the kids first instead of killing Darlie first. Burglars do not stalk suburban streets at night looking for a house to burgle. Too much likelihood someone will be at home. And your average routine burglar doesn't want to encounter someone at home - they want to get in, get the goods, and get out. Believe me, I know this.
So, if there was a burglar at the Routier household, he was most likely invited there. Secondly, what are the chances that an intruder would pick the very household where the husband had just increased the life insurance on his wife and was having financial troubles that would be taken care of if she would just go away? Thirdly, no intruder/burgler I have ever met, and I have met plenty, would stop and take the time to locate a knife and slit a window screen hoping to make it look like the entry/exit point? None - having stabbed two children and a woman, they would get the hell out of Dodge via a door - most likely the one they used to enter the house. And, fourth, upon finding (and possibly awakening) a mother and two children in a house you only intended to burgle, anyone bent on violence would kill the mother first. She would be the only person who could possibly identify him if left alive and there would be nothing to gain by killing the children who would probably not be able to identify the burglar or pose any threat to a burglar. I believe Darin either knocked Darlie out with some kind of chemical, stabbed the two children first (again, only something an inexperienced killer would do - a real killer would kill the mom first. She was the one who was worth REAL money) then proceeded with trying to kill Darlie. She came to, realized what was going on, and began a coverup to protect her husband from being arrested. Why she would do such a thing, I don't know, I would have let him fry. Or else Darin provided entry via an unlocked door for someone he had hired to do the deed. And let's face it, if someone had been hired to come into the house and kill Darlie and possibly some children, they would have done it with a gun, not a knife. Shoot and get out. Not take the time to stab everyone knowing someone else might be upstairs in a bedroom. Not take the time to cut up a window screen. Just my opinion from what I know about how criminals operate.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 10, 2018:
Wow Jade, that is news. I've been working on some other literary projects lately and haven't been keeping up with recent Darlie developments, or I should say legitimate developments.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 10, 2018:
Do tell us more, Mr. Phillips.
JadeMarks on January 09, 2018:
Fuckery alert! November 2017 Routiers lawyer filed for and was granted more...MORE DNA testing. That means one of two things...this bitch really is circling the drain or we’re all going to be talking about this crap another stinkin year. What the hell...
Bernard Phillips on January 07, 2018:
the utility room floor had lots of blood drops on it
Magpie 9 on January 05, 2018:
Yep Exhibit 38 b is a picture of the utility room floor and bottom of the door. There are drops of blood all over the floor
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 05, 2018:
Magpie 9, one more thought on the utility room. I do recall the defense tried to make an issue out of the photo marked states exhibit 38B (I think) which shows what appears to be a possible transfer print of some type that was presumed to have come from officer Wadell's boot as he went around the kitchen and started to enter the garage. I believe it was found right at the entrance to the utility room. That may be what you're referring to. The defense said it could have been a hiking boot print from the supposed intruder.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 05, 2018:
Hi Magpie 9, good to hear from you again!
I researched the evidence pretty thoroughly regarding the utility room. No blood found on the floor, only the outside of the door facing the kitchen and the washing machine on it's left side as you face it. There was some trace blood found on a sign leaning on a box just inside the garage but it was ruled out as to being connected to the crime scene. There was also what was originally thought to be a spot of blood on the garage floor which turned out to be dried Kool-Aid that had been spilled there.
Magpie 9 on January 05, 2018:
I don't think nightmare is kezzy. Kezzy is batshit crazy, but she doesn't generally descent to the level of incoherence
Magpie 9 on January 05, 2018:
Just a minor correction, but the utility room had several drips and splotches of blood on the utility room floor. Which is pretty damning since Darlie repeatly claimed not to have entered the utility room after the attack
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 03, 2018:
Happy New Year to you too Everton, and you Jade as well. Good to hear from you guys again. Not sure this one is Kezzy, Jade. She's in Canada and that last comment originated in the Philadelphia area.
JadeMarks on January 03, 2018:
Nightmare324 aka Kezzy There is an app called grammerly. It might help make your comments readable. You should use it
Everton on January 03, 2018:
Lol. Is it just me, or do all of these Darlie fanatics seem to not be able to make it out of elementary school? There are literally more misspelled words in that comment than there are verbs. Sclemmons, if "Nightmare324" writes at that level, he CANNOT POSSIBLY be able to read this article and even understand it unaided, so don't even acknowledge this ridiculous criticism. Happy New Year. Can we get an execution date this year Texas? June 4th 2018 has a nice ring to it.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on January 03, 2018:
Nightmare324: You are certainly entitled to your opinion. Reading your nonsensical jibberish makes me feel all the more glad that I paid attention to my teacher in the first grade when we were taught how to read, write, and spell.
And by the way, Paul Joseph Goebbels (if you even know who he was) spelled his name with 2 "B's," not 2 "LL's."
Nightmare324 on December 30, 2017:
Omg did you waste a lot of time. I think she was a bad person but you didn't cooberate shut you just write a fiction story a ling one of a hick tiwn police department out of their league. There us ni motive the tineline doesn't fit and tge cops did make mistakes. I happen to agree she was a narcissistic person, but I am not going to take a drugged out teenagers word fir shit and anytime anyone brings up the video their opinion is bullshit we know it's all based on that. Is she a vain narcissist yes I think so. I also kniw there is reasinable doubt. Wake up euth your tgriat cut like that to a hellhole you wouldn't know or remeber exactly what went in and u see a towel next to Damon in your own pic. Wow did yiu waste time Joseph Goebells wannabe. You can't cimpare to his propaganda skills sorry Capt. Douche.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on December 24, 2017:
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to you as well Jade and all others that have contributed posts here. You guys be safe!
JadeMarks on December 23, 2017:
Sup SClemmons! Hi y’all! Merry Christmas! Just dropped by to reiterate Darlie is going to die for killing her two boys! I hope whoever twists the toe tag puts a smiley face on it...!
Tim Midwestguy on November 29, 2017:
Finally found voices of reason about this case! I’ve sat through most of the documentaries and heard her mother get caught in lie after lie and watched Darlie constantly play the victim card and it actually sickened me. I was convinced of her guilt as soon as I saw her injuries and actually listened over the years to her appeals.
An absolute joke! All she had going was the fact that she was a semi pretty white woman with a big chest and everybody knows those women never kill. What crap! Just stop already and put this animal down.
SClemmons (author) from the Carolina Coast on October 26, 2017:
Hi Jen and thank you! So nice to hear from someone that actually took the time to read, research, and examine the evidence prior to making a decision from the heart or from a YouTube video.
I couldn't agree more with your observations and comments regarding this case. I agree the motive is difficult to clearly see. I think a combination of things in her life just overwhelmed her and I truly believe that she regrets what she did. But, the bottom line is that she did do it and she's where she needs to be.