THE ICON OF THE AMERICAN DREAM
WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "AMERICAN DREAM"?
ACCORDING TO WIKIPEDIA, THE IDEA OF THE AMERICAN DREAM BEGAN as early as 1774 where the Royal Governor of Virginia said of Americans, "for ever imagine the Lands further off are still better than those upon which they are already settled." In the same Wikipedia article, one of the Jews fleeing to America in 1848 said:
”The German emigrant comes into a country free from the despotism, privileged orders and monopolies, intolerable taxes, and constraints in matters of belief and conscience. Everyone can travel and settle wherever he pleases. No passport is demanded, no police mingles in his affairs or hinders his movements....Fidelity and merit are the only sources of honor here. The rich stand on the same footing as the poor; the scholar is not a mug above the most humble mechanics; no German ought to be ashamed to pursue any occupation....[In America] wealth and possession of real estate confer not the least political right on its owner above what the poorest citizen has. Nor are there nobility, privileged orders, or standing armies to weaken the physical and moral power of the people, nor are there swarms of public functionaries to devour in idleness credit for. Above all, there are no princes and corrupt courts representing the so-called divine 'right of birth.' In such a country the talents, energy and perseverance of a person...have far greater opportunity to display than in monarchies."
Also from the same article in Wikipedia, historian James Truslow Adams popularized the phrase "American Dream" in his 1931 book Epic of America with:
"But there has been also the American dream, that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for every man, with opportunity for each according to his ability or achievement. It is a difficult dream for the European upper classes to interpret adequately, and too many of us ourselves have grown weary and mistrustful of it. It is not a dream of motor cars and high wages merely, but a dream of social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable, and be recognized by others for what they are, regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position."
"The American dream, that has lured tens of millions of all nations to our shores in the past century has not been a dream of merely material plenty, though that has doubtlessly counted heavily. It has been much more than that. It has been a dream of being able to grow to fullest development as man and woman, unhampered by the barriers which had slowly been erected in the older civilizations, unrepressed by social orders which had developed for the benefit of classes rather than for the simple human being of any and every class."
"We will win our freedom because the sacred heritage of our nation and the eternal will of God are embodied in our echoing demands. . . . when these disinherited childrens of God sat down at lunch counters they were in reality standing up for what is best in the American dream and for the most sacred values in our Judeo-Christian heritage, thereby bringing our nation back to those great wells of democracy which were dug deep by the founding fathers in their formulation of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence."
I think each of these quotes clearly reflect what most Americans, regardless of political persuasion, have in mind when they think about the American Dream. From where I sit, James Thurlow Adams probably is closest to the rhetoric being used in political debate today and consequently forms the basis of the rest of my this hub.
WHAT MIGHT THE CRITERIA BE?
IN TODAY'S POLITICAL DEBATE, one of the major issues is whether the government, mainly the federal government, is helping or hindering its citizens in their quest in obtaining the American Dream. In order to discuss this intelligently, one must be able to measure whether Americans are attaining the Dream and, to do that one needs Criteria. So, what might such criteria be?
If we look back at our quotes for guidance, the criteria become rather easy to construct. This is what I come up with:
- From Adams, we have "... that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for every man, with opportunity for each according to his ability or achievement ... regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position." translates to me as "Economic Equality". In other words, all Americans have an equal chance of succeeding or failing on their own merit and participating equally in the fortunes or misfortunes bestowed on America. "Equally" meaning, their fair share; not receiving any more or less than their due simply because of their social or economic status. For example, if the economy improves 10%, then, everything else being equal, there is no reason their position relative to everybody else should change; their fortune should improve 10% as well.
- From Adams, we also have "... but a dream of social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable, and be recognized by others for what they are, ..." comes the idea of "Economic Mobility"; the ability of a person move up the economic ladder if their talents allow them to.
- From the German immigrant, we have " ... a country free from the despotism, privileged orders and monopolies, intolerable taxes, and constraints in matters of belief and conscience ..."; to me, this becomes, "Social Equality". The American Dream isn't limited to just the economic realm, but, to meet the immigrants just stated ideal and Adams' " ... life should be better, richer, and fuller ..." assertion, one must also consider the social aspects of American life.
These three criteria then, Economic Equality, Economic Mobility, and Social Equality, make up, in my opinion, the totality of what the American Dream is all about; any attribute you wish to associate with the American Dream should be able to be described by one of those three criteria. It can be said then that if a person attains all three criteria, then they can truly say they have realized the "American Dream" and if the American Society, can show it exhibits these three criteria, then, and only then, can we say we have met the goals set out by our founding fathers.
WHAT ROLE SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT PLAY IN MEETING IN THESE CRITERIA?
I HOPE NOBODY WOULD DISAGREE if I said that the fundamental purpose of the Federal government in America is to provide the environment for its citizens to prosper. In 1797, it was to do this by simply insuring that white, land-owning, Protestant male's natural right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness was not infringed by either the Federal or State governments. Over the next 200 years through various Amendments to the Constitution, this authority was expanded to include women, all religions, all races, and without the need to own property; every one of these changes, by the way, was fraught with controversy, including a civil war.
While no one may disagree with the above assertion, there is certainly major disagreement on how the Federal government is to achieve this end. Conservatives and Liberals have distinctly different ideas on how the government can assist Americans in achieving the American Dream and both sides cite the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution as their source of inspiration.
Nevertheless, to understand what role the government must play, you need to understand the results needed to achieve Economic Equality, Economic Mobility, and Social Equality; in other words, what national environment must be in place for the American Dream to flourish. Without being proscriptive as to how to achieve these goals, it makes since to me the federal government would need to:
- Provide an environment where business can operate with few impediments and with the expectation that the economy will be relatively stable.
- Provide an environment where its citizens can realize economic mobility.
- Provide an environment where all citizens can benefit more or less equally, based on their abilities, from the business environment provided by the government.
- Provide an environment where all citizens have an equal opportunity to succeed, based on their abilities, and free from artificial social barriers to advancement.
As you move along the political spectrum, you hear different prescriptions for what the federal government needs to do to provide this environment. In fact, both Conservatives and Moderates have each had a chance to try out their versions of the American Dream; over 140 years for the Conservatives and around 50 years for moderates/Liberals.
From President Thomas Jefferson in 1801, a fiscal Conservative and social moderate who firmly believed in a Tea Party-style of limited government, to President Herbert Hoover in 1933, also a strong fiscal Conservative and social moderate, America, with one short period from 1901 to 1913, was operating under varying degrees of fiscal Conservatism. The Austrian School of economics was the economic model of the time and the only real fight between parties of any substance was whether to 1) have a one or two metal standard to which the dollar was pegged, 2) whether to have high or low tariffs, and 3) whether to have a central bank or not.
(As to the third point, until 1913, when the Federal Reserve was permanently established, America only had two central banks, one from 1791 - 1811, and again in 1816 - 1836. In both cases, these central banks were set-up to solve immediate crises. In the first case, the central bank was supported by George Washington, John Adams, and Alexander Hamilton while being opposed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The second central bank, sort of like President Bush's TARP, was a creature of necessity forced on a President, James Madison, who was philosophically opposed, to prevent economic collapse.)
On the Moderate to Liberal side, we have the period of Keynesian economics from Franklin Roosevelt in 1933, a fiscal moderate/conservative and social liberal, through President Jimmy Carter in 1980, a fiscal moderate and social liberal. After that, American started moving back toward the Austrian school culminating in a near abandonment of Keynesian economics in 2001 which lasted until the Great Recession of 2008.
It will be the challenge of the next set of hubs in this American Dream series to examine each of these economic periods in light of the criteria we have set out for ourselves to see whether the Conservative view on how to achieve the American Dream was more successful than the Moderate to Liberal version.
- The American Dream, Conservative Style - I: Fair Tax...
This is an expansion on a comment I made regarding wealth redistribution and tax policy on the wealthy with additional insight as to how our current tax code is really not fair to the less wealthy.
- The American Dream, Conservative Style - I: Fair Tax...
U.S. tax policy will be one of the top debating issues in the 2012 Presidential election. Most Americans believe raising taxes on the wealthy is the right thing to do, even Conservative Americans. Not so Conservative politicians. This hub looks at on
- The American Dream, Conservative Style - II: Does Co...
There has been a very long-standing debate in America about the benefits of
- Immigration Reform - Supply and Demand Plus The Amer...
The immigration reform debate in the United States has included many proposals over the past few years. It has also included a troublesome amount of histrionics from all quarters. Unfortunately most of the solutions offered to date have been for the.
- A Short History of Significant American Panics,Reces...
The debate as to whether Conservative or Progressive economic theory was better for the country. The best way to measure that, I think, is to look at the history of Panics, Recessions, and Depressions in America since its foundings and compare that w
AMERICAN DREAM ON AMAZON
Scott Belford (author) from Keystone Heights, FL on February 06, 2012:
Thanks again for your comment Jo. I had actually written a couple of hubs that fit under this title and was working on another, about economic equality, when it occurred to me I needed some organization and order. So I stopped, ripped out a section from what I was working on, and expanded it to this.
I think I will find there have been periods of "mobility" for segments of American society at various points in time, but as a rule, I suspect you are right. Certainly so for women and all races accept whites and Asians from anytime prior to the 1980s.
Jo Miller from Tennessee on February 06, 2012:
Good job! I believe this type of debate is what politics should be about. Instead we often get sidetracked in this country with what I call "hot-button" issues--like gay marriage or abortion. There are two very different philosophies of government that have always existed in this country and good people can come down on either side.
I'll be interested to see where this leads. I remember reading about a study done several years ago that concluded there was not as much upward mobility in this country as we would like to believe.