Skip to main content

Why Are Democrats Hiding the Truth About the Jan 6, 2021 Protest, and the BLM Terrorist Acts During the Summer of 2020?

I am a political junkie, a Christian conservative that believes that once we know the truth, the truth will set us free.

Vice-Presidential Candidate Kamala Harris Said that the Protest Were not Going to Stop.

Fact check, Reuters Staff, yes VP Kamala Harris did say the Protest would continue, not the violent Protest would continue. She did distinguish between the two, as did then Presidential Candidate Joseph Biden, in August of that year, he made the following statement.

"None of this is protesting. It's lawlessness, plain and simple. And those who do it should be prosecuted. Violence will not bring change, it will only bring destruction. It's wrong in every way."

And Kamala Harris said the following "We must always defend peaceful protest and peaceful protesters. We should not confuse them with those looting and committing acts of violence." She added, "We will not let these vigilantes and extremists derail the path to justice."

Above quotes found on Fact Check: CNN.

Okay, they have both publicly condemned the violence. Where are the Jan 6th style hearings? These protest were not random, there was an organized effort behind these protest. I want to know who organized and financed these protest? Are they the same ones who orchestrated the violence?, these acts of terrorism that had so many Americans afraid to leave their homes? These riots went on for over three months, compare that to roughly three hours of protesting outside, and then inside the Capital Building on Jan 6, 2021.


Over 300 People Facing Federal Charges For Crimes Committed During Nationwide Demonstrations

Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs Thursday, September 24, 2020

According to this release from The Department of Justice, as of the publish date of the Article, more than 300 individuals in 29 States and Washington, D. C., have had Federal Charges filed against them. Charges range from attempted murder, assaulting a law enforcement officer, arson, burglary of a federally-licensed firearms dealer, damaging federal property, malicious destruction of property using fire or explosives, felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, unlawful possession of a destructive device, inciting a riot, felony civil disorder, and others.

What I want to know? Who organized these 'peaceful protest'? Who is paying attorney fees for those involved in the violence? And finally, are any of the organizers, or financiers going to be charged under RICO Statutes?

Results of BLM Terrorist attacks in MN

This burned-out car is next to a burned-out police Station in Minneapolis, MN

This burned-out car is next to a burned-out police Station in Minneapolis, MN

Scroll to Continue
Minnesota State Police

Minnesota State Police

Jan 6, Protestor Being Driven Back by Members of the Capital Police

 Trump supporters are being pushed back after Jan 6 violent protest ended.

Trump supporters are being pushed back after Jan 6 violent protest ended.

Trump's Involvement in Protest on January 6, 2021.

Compare that to roughly three hours of protesting outside, and then inside the Capital Building on Jan 6, 2021.According to the caption, Trump Supporters are being driven back by the Police, I am sure there are more protesters on both sides of the camera. But only one is shown in the picture. I have noticed that the Propaganda outlets of the DNC are back to spreading their lies about Donald Trump and His involvement in the events of Jan 6. However, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who is in charge of organizing security at the Capital building, and House Sargent at Arms Paul D Irving turned down the National Guard assistance..

On January 4, Capitol Police chief Steven Sund requested additional National Guard support from Irving and Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael C. Stenger.[10][11] That request was denied. Sund claims Irving's refusal cited concerns about "optics", though Irving disputes this claim.[12][13]

The above Article is copied from a Wikipedia Biography of Irving, Subheading: Responding to the 2021 Capitol Attack.

I am Assuming that these 'Leaders of Democracy', and 'Protectors of the Constitution' would have sent a Copy of this request to President Donald Trump, since, according to Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, the President is the only one with the authority to Federalize NG forces. And if He received such a request, maybe He did exactly what He said and authorized between 10,000 and 20,000 troops, just as He has claimed. However, security of the Capitol building is the responsibility of Speaker Pelosi, House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul D, Irving, and Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael C. Stenger. Speaker Pelosi and House Sergeant-at-Arms Irving turned down his Authorization.

Below excerpt from Same Article as cited above

According to the same Wikipedia article: On January 7, 2021, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that Irving would be submitting his resignation as Sergeant at Arms.

If this article from Wikipedia is to be believed, I would say that President Trump's recount of the facts leading up to Jan. 6, 2020 are a lot more believable than the rants coming from the Speaker of The House, Nancy Pelosi.

The so-called bi-partisan January 6, 2020 Commission.

Considering the fact that the only 2 Republicans House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi would allow on this Inquisition, Elizabeth Cheney, and Adam Kinzinger, had both previously voted to Impeach President Trump tells us everything we need to know about this sham of an investigation. If its intent was the Truth, Nancy Pelosi would have been called to testify on why she turned down President Trump's Authorization of between 10,000-20,000 NG troops. And there are so many so-called 'facts' released by the Commission that have been proven to be flat-out lies. The end result, the percentage of Americans who believe their findings will be lower than President Biden's current approval ratings. I hope.

Are News Outlets Biased?

This content reflects the personal opinions of the author. It is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge and should not be substituted for impartial fact or advice in legal, political, or personal matters.

© 2022 Joseph Barrow

Related Articles