Updated date:

Supreme Court Justice Nominee Brett Kavanaugh Found Guilty of Being a Man, in Today’s Prevailing, Toxic, Leftist Climate

Ignore the in-my-face obvious issues and lend all of my attention to unwarranted, groundless non-issues? Not happening!

Brett Kavanaugh and Family

Brett Kavanaugh and Family

Beware of Staged Spectacles

With each new day, my concerns for the future of my sons and my grandsons grows deeper.

I've never in my life seen the likes of what we are seeing out of mainstream media television and in mainstream media print.

Women are to be believed, no matter what their claim may be and men are not to be believed.....no matter what!

We all witnessed the outbursts of Democratic Senators and of paid protestors in the back of the room, during the Kavanaugh hearings. It was so ugly that Judge Kavanaugh's daughters had to be dismissed from the staged spectacle.

With every attempt of Senator Grassley to proceed, another disrespectful outburst from a Democrat.
With the exception of Spartacus, (aka Cory Booker, (D), the female Democrats were especially getting on my last nerve...so pompous, as if rules only apply to others (men), not them.

They came off as rude, hateful, bitter and defiant!

I think we all knew, once Kavanaugh was able to begin to speak and to take questions, that the Democrats weren't done, they would find a way to hinder the final vote to confirm Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court....



Paid Protestor

Paid Protestor

The Secret Letter

We entered into the weekend and into a brand new week with breaking 'News', that Senator Diane Feinstein (D) California, had in her possession, a letter.

  • No, she had not just come into possession of it
  • No, she had not discussed the letter with the Judge in their private meetings
  • No, she didn't bring up the letter nor question Brett Kavanaugh about it in the televised hearings

She apparently, had the letter for months, waiting for the right moment to spring it on everyone.

In the letter, a woman claimed that Judge Kavanaugh forced himself on her when they were in high school, nearly 40 years before.

The accuser, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, via her spokesperson, Attorney Debra Katz, had asked for her day in court to be heard, to tell her story.

Everyone agreed, both Republican and Democrat, that Dr. Ford should have her day and should have her say!

All while questioning, I know that I was...why now?

Why this last minute accusation, that changed the headlines of the day?

Why not decades ago, when this allegedly happened?

Why not before his career began?

Why not years ago, when Mitt Romney, in his Presidential run, was considering Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court vacancy?

Why not months ago, when Kavanaugh made President Trump's short list for Supreme Court nominee?

It smelled to high heavens!


Stall Tactics

But, as suddenly as this news was sprung on us and although all agreed that she should have her day to make her case and he should have his day to defend himself against her accusations, she, Dr. Ford, suddenly suggested, she'd not attend after all.
It was so odd that she even considered declining this opportunity, with the spotlight on her, to get a nearly 40 year old heavy burden off of her chest, once and for all...

~~~

It was beginning to make perfect sense...more stall tactics.

Stall tactics utilized by the Democrats, carried over and carried on, via a brand new strategy, there wasn’t a doubt in my mind!

So predictable, how the left operates, they have nothing and so they resort to tricks up their sleeves.

But, they somehow manage to make it work for them, time and time and time again.

~~~

If this woman, Dr. Ford, did not show up to tell her story, then that would be that...the end. We would just have to accept that she was too fragile to go forth, the media would come up with something, guaranteed!

The way I saw it, if she didn’t show up...she would lose all credibility, which was already shaky, at best...

Serious Business

This was/this is, very serious stuff.

No doubt, there are men that take advantage of women, these women will have a very hard time being believed, if activist women continue to play games with bogus claims...in these very serious matters.

At the same time, I have sons and grandsons....I worry about their future, when I see that so many women throw out accusations, without evidence to back it up and we are expected to believe them...no matter how vague, no matter how shaky!

I have an ex-sister-in-law that used to randomly hit my brother in the head while he would be totally off guard; sleeping or watching television.

On a couple of occasions she sustained injuries, as a result of her over indulgence in her bad habits and then would call the police, blaming my brother.

It was a big game to her.

The Police figured out her game very quickly, but nonetheless, she put my brother through it for too many years. She'd cry and blame her addictions and beg his forgiveness, he'd take her back and she'd do it again. There was a pattern. He finally broke it, by divorcing her.

My point....there are many bad seeds, they come in both female and male varieties!

By today's standards, the man is to be doubted, not matter what!
No matter the character they've exemplified over a lifetime, no matter the character witnesses that come forward!

~~~

It is a very dangerous precedent being set....by those that use it to manipulate an outcome; for political gain, for personal notoriety or for whatever their reason or purpose.

Women will be hurt by it.

Men will be hurt by it.

Nobody wins!

Dr. Ford needed to show up, otherwise we‘d put it all behind us and proceed with the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh.

The stall tactics, the games the Dems played, made a mockery out of serious matters that affect us all!

~~~
She did show up and we all know where it went from there.

Congratulations Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh!

This content is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge and is not meant to substitute for formal and individualized advice from a qualified professional.

© 2018 A B Williams

Comments

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 08, 2018:

Ugh....they are really challenging this optimist Brad!

Brad on October 08, 2018:

AB

What the democrats have said is when they win back congress they will start the impeachment of judge Kavanaugh, and of course a new flame will be under their bottoms to impeach president Trump.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 08, 2018:

Yes T, I may have to agree with you, from the looks of my newsfeed this morning. :(

In addition to their waywardness, NOT ONE Democrat (that I’ve seen or heard about) has stepped forward to say.....ENOUGH, the radicals among us, do not speak for all of us. ENOUGH with the threats and getting in the faces of people out having dinner, catching a show, etc.

You’d think there would be ONE!

The Logician from now on on October 07, 2018:

Never happen AB, they know exactly who they are at their core, shameless, hate filled, immoral two faced liars (and proud of it!) who put their secret agendas above all else holy and sacred like the constitution.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 07, 2018:

A fine synopsis Brad.

We need to do all in our power; as in spreading the word, not backing down, remaining steadfast....to keep the Dems out of power!

Maybe they (the Dems) can take advantage of their downtime, to not only lick their wounds, but regroup and try to figure out who they are at their core and the why, when, how...did they go so wrong.

Brad on October 07, 2018:

AB

"A Dangerous Precedent This Way Comes: An Accused Judge, His Accuser, a P.C. Climate and a Methodical Game, Plays Out"

B:

The dangerous precedent was the replacement of due process, and presumption of innocence, with politics and mob rule. I have said it before it was like the old mobs in the wild west, bypassing the sheriff, getting the mob drunk, swinging a rope and inciting the mob to break into the jail and get the defendant. Then to the nearest tree to hang him.

We can apply this methodology to the democrats handling of the judge Kavanaugh confirmation hearing.

The players included the democrats on the senate judiciary committee. The main player there was CA dem senator Dianne Feinstein. She was the one that would figuratively put the defendant into the jail because due process was no longer present. Once Feinstein produced the secret hidden accusations of Dr. Ford another protection for the defendant was gone, that of the presumption of innocence.

A third protection of the defendant would also disappear, and that is the right to confront your accuser. But Feinstein and the other democrats would hammer that into the ground, because they would say that we should just believe the accuser, and not put her through any kind of stressful situation.

The mob would consist of the media, paid protestors, and the Me Too group, as well as the groups wanting to ensure Roe wouldn't be overturned. Instead of liquor used in the wild west to incite the crowd, these groups would use the demand that All Men just shut up. Any attempt to quell the rage, and hysteria manufactured by the democrats and these groups would not be tolerated.

Then after failing to get the crowds incitement to throw the rope over the tree they would look and bring forth anything with any kind of incitement quality. One after another they would present this incitement only to see it fizzle out by the truth.

In the end, they failed, but their mob mentality continues as they double down saying when they get control of congress this year they will impeach SC justice Kavanaugh as well as president Trump.

Today, America and Democracy are back on its proper foundation, but as long as the democrats can get back their power, it is only a fleeting moment of justice.

The Logician from now on on October 07, 2018:

If what you mean by “sophisticated linguistics” is the dribble that speed from your mouth, you are right.

If you mean the dictionary definition of sophisticated linguistics: the scientific study of language and its structure, including the study of morphology, syntax, phonetics, and semantics. Specific branches of linguistics include sociolinguistics, dialectology, psycholinguistics, computational linguistics, historical-comparative linguistics, and applied linguistics.

there is nothing sophisticated nor scientific about anything I have ever seen you say and I dare you to find one person on hubpages that would disagree with this comment.

Sophistication would begin with an apology to AB, the author of this hubpage, for smearing her good name, sophistication is something you Eric know nothing about.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 06, 2018:

Finally T. though you cannot understand sophisticated linguistics you make an intelligent remark. I will allow you to name my party and perspective. Monikers are like stereotypes and I would embrace a stereotype of those like me who believe that connection with others is the rule and not the exception. My name starts with E and ends with er. Maybe the party of Error? It could fit.

We do stand for the notion of synercommunity which is not a word.

The Logician from now on on October 06, 2018:

Eric, bless your heart, you sound like a broken record, repeating incoherant statements that in the context of the topic of this hubpage are irrelevant.

I’ve concluded you aren’t a liberal, you’re in a class all your own, and since it meets your requirement of not being a broad generalization I assume you approve because it is a class of one - just you!

Now we need a name for it to delineate it from liberal or conservative. How about dierkeral or dierkertive. Try that out and let us know just which you want to be called.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 06, 2018:

Thank you Brad.

Brad on October 06, 2018:

Eric

Your comment demonstrates what I have said.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 06, 2018:

I truly believe that a level of consciousness has now been raised. A suggestion not to lump ones who disagree in measure as one who disagrees on all. Being critical of a conservative does not make one a ranting liberal, and of course vice versa.

Collins for sure taught us that even handed evaluation is always appropriate. I do not care if someone pidgin holes her a liberal republican like they so slammed McCain as a RHINO.

Their words ring true if they do, but not based on a label we first conclude before listening as many did with Kavanaugh.

We are seeing the first wave of thinkers for a decade. We must stay the course and invite certain discord in order that all positions are heard.

"This 'great divide' is only an opportunity to build a bridge." Some moron just put that out there in his thesis.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 06, 2018:

Oh trust me I know how the left operates!

I know a lot of prayers are going up for him and his family, for our President and for this Nation!

Brad on October 06, 2018:

AB

Confirmed yes, but like the Donald Trump winning the presidency, Kavanaugh winning his place on the SC will only bring out more of what we have seen.

The left doesn't recognize results that are not in their favor.

While "we" can put the Kavanaugh confirmation to sleep, we should sleep with one eye open.

It is going to be a rough ride to the mid term election.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 06, 2018:

Confirmed. Well done.

Brad on October 06, 2018:

T

Eric named us, so I just gave me comment, and you gave your comment so we wouldn't be accused of colluding or conspiring against him. Although that is what he did by making us as one, when we a two that have our own comments that seem to align in the same direction.

We will see how he responds to us, if at all?

The Logician from now on on October 06, 2018:

Brad, I already did that but he did address you too so have at it!

Glad to see you and I are on the same page.

Brad on October 06, 2018:

Eric

Let us parse your most recent comment

-----------------------------------------------------

"Our dangerous precedent"

B:

Who is our?

What is the precedent?

Why is it dangerous?

--------------------------------

"has much more to do with our opposing attitudes than what is actually happening."

B

What opposing?

What attitudes"

What is happening?

---------------------------------

" At some point one has to step aside from partisanship."

B:

Who are you referring to?

It is not partisan to question the facts, or the lack of the facts about an accusation. The search is for the truth. Yet, you deem anything discussing the facts or lack there off as partisan.

When partisans are being discussed it is still not partisanship for someone to show the flaws and faults or there partisanship. Yet, you claim that is partisanship, and if that is your view then you are wrong.

-----------------------------------

Because I criticize and do not agree with a conservative

B:

It is how you criticize and how you disagree that is the problem. No one can tell from your convoluted use of the English language what you are talking about in your comments.

And you called is BS when I said I wasn't any label liberal, conservative or any. Just because my analysis and comments favor one side doesn't mean I am a conservative. It really means that the conservative side of the argument makes more sense.

I have told you more than once, I just like Donald Trump because he isn't a politician, and he unlike all other elected officials or candidates didn't cause the decades of bad decisions, the congressional gridlock, the wars, the bad deals with countries around the world, etc.

Based on what the parties have done in the past several decades to the country and the people, I consider the GOP the lesser of two evils.

---------------------------------------

"does not make me a raving liberal."

B:

You use their same logic, and their mantras that don't stay on subject, that don't use facts, or even make relevant references to make what your say understandable.

----------------------------------------

" Brad and T. if I do not agree with you does not make me on the other side of the "Isle". You do not have the right to assume or cast me into your categories."

B:

Again it is not your disagreement that I personally have a problem, it is the lack of staying in the moment and saying things that are not relevant and are vague and ambiguous.

You are in a category all by yourself.

I didn't put you in a category, I used your comments to point out how irrelevant and how they go to attacking rather than offering a coherent compelling position.

-----------------------------------------

"Broad generalizations are like a bigotry a bias and a prejudice."

B:

I have used specifics here, and you certainly from your comments show that you know more about bigotry, bias and prejudice. I make my opinions and conclusions from the source and what ever facts and evidence or lack of evidence that is available.

------------------------------------------

B:

In conclusion. Your current comment is proof of what we have said about your comments. Instead of commenting on the specifics of the article, you chose the preacher tactic to discipline your self made congregation.

If you want to be the martyr and the victim, then you should get a go fund me going.

Again, it is not personal, it is factual based on your writings.

---------------------------

The Logician from now on on October 06, 2018:

Well Eric, bless your heart, I guess you are not interested in mending any bridges since you haven’t apologized to AB, whom you most agregiously smeared. So now explain this.

What is it with you, you raise straw a man every time you speak. That’s what liberals do. Only your straw men make no sense. I’m not attacking you nor spreading hate. I am trying to understand what you say.

“Our dangerous precedent has much more to do with our opposing attitudes than what is actually happening.”

This means nothing. What precedent, what opposing attitudes, what is actually happening? You are speaking gibberish or evidently playing some scenerio in your head that no one knows what you are thinking.

“At some point one has to step aside from partisanship.”

Who is being partisan and how? Calling a spade a spade is not being partisan but it appears you believe that all truth is relative, a liberal tenant.

“Because I criticize and do not agree with a conservative does not make me a raving liberal.”

Correct but another straw man. No one said you are a liberal because we disagree, I said you are a liberal because you act like a liberal, you use liberal tactics, you are raising straw men, you are putting words in my mouth, things I never said and lastly YOU attack the messenger, me and even AB who has nothing to do with anything you or I have said. And you call her hateful?

“Brad and T. if I do not agree with you does not make me on the other side of the "Isle". You do not have the right to assume or cast me into your categories.”

NO ONE has done that but you have no right to dictate to anyone what their opinion should be, you are the one casting people into categories without proof btw. I cite proof for anything I say and the proof is right here that you behave exactly like a liberal.

“Broad generalizations are like a bigotry a bias and a prejudice.”

And so why do YOU make unfounded broad generalizations? Broad generalizations can be a bigotry but when based on the facts they are not however you are the only one making broad generalizations not based on fact.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 06, 2018:

Our dangerous precedent has much more to do with our opposing attitudes than what is actually happening. At some point one has to step aside from partisanship. Because I criticize and do not agree with a conservative does not make me a raving liberal. Brad and T. if I do not agree with you does not make me on the other side of the "Isle". You do not have the right to assume or cast me into your categories.

Broad generalizations are like a bigotry a bias and a prejudice.

Brad on October 06, 2018:

AB

While Eric is blaming everyone here for dispensing hate, and calling it conservative hate is a red herring, and simply wrong.

The focus of hate is what the democrats, and their believers have been doing since July with judge Kavanaugh. Instead of Eric focusing on that blatant hate, he chooses to provide zero comments on the article. His only input is some mutation of the English language that is hard to translate in order to know what is his point.

Eric is acting like a preacher that is trying to find his congregation, when this article should be his focus, he can't seem to find a path to it.

Eric

Once again, this is not an insult but a fact, you remember facts!

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 06, 2018:

Thanks T!

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 06, 2018:

I don’t partake, I don’t support...I don’t condone...I don’t accept...I don’t know what else to say to you.

The Logician from now on on October 06, 2018:

“Well T I apologize for any transgressions.”

Apology accepted and I apologize for inflicting Elmer Fudd on you.

“ I will answer any question you have. However it would need to be asked without requiring me to assume any underlying opinion you have. (hopefully you can understand that)”

I never required anything of you let alone any underlying opinion I have, I actually have no opinions I deal in facts. If I state an opinion I make it clear it is my opinion so don’t confuse facts with opinion. They are two different things.

That I spread meaness is your flawed “opinion” but the fact is you are confusing meaness with just telling it like it is which is what I try to do.

Now if you really want to mend these bridges apologize to AB and retract every lie you smeared her with.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 06, 2018:

AB I truly like this sentiment. My larger point is that we need to police our own. Because I agree with a persons bent, does not mean that I agree with how they express it. Christians must rebuke radical hate in their mists. Muslims need to rebuke radical violent hate.

You seem to think that ignoring another's hate is not supporting it.

"bad things happen when good women do nothing".

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 06, 2018:

Now I know how Judge Kavanaugh must feel!

I will not ignore accusations made against me for things I have not taken part in. I will not have my good name destroyed like this.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 06, 2018:

Eric, why have you brought me into this?

I don’t “endorse hate”.

I am NOT here at HP to back or support anyone....I am here to write!

I am always very careful with the words I choose.

I do not condone hate being spread and I resent being told I am taking part in it. You wrote that T, “had me drink the hate kool-aid”, I resent that, there is no proof of that in my six years here at HP. BUT......maybe it just fits in with today’s leftist philosophy......throw something out there, hope it sticks. Hope you destroy someone’s life in a pathetic effort.

Obviously it has worked, when it comes to me, I contribute many articles which are engaging and topical and yet, HP scores me a ‘30’, that’s what they think of me!

Apparently you do too, I never realized that before Eric!

I appreciate everyone that comments on my articles. Dialogue is imperative, especially in this crazy political climate we find ourselves in. But, if we can’t discuss as adults, then maybe we should not communicate at all.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 06, 2018:

Well T I apologize for any transgressions. I will answer any question you have. However it would need to be asked without requiring me to assume any underlying opinion you have. (hopefully you can understand that)

Yes I am attacking you for spreading meanness. As AB just wrote: "There are many things we are asked to put behind us, in order to move on, certainly in our own personal lives, but also as citizens of this Country. Whether it's the impeachment of a President or an attack on our Homeland, we are taken aback and shaken for a time and then it is time to move on, we must!"

Maybe you and I can do this.

The Logician from now on on October 06, 2018:

Eric, bless your heart, I say you don’t make sense (and you don’t) and instead of explaining my questions about what you say you launch on a personal attack of me! Now that is hate on display and the prime liberal tactic libs use to avoid answering questions. What YOU Eric is a liberal who engages in the same old despicable liberal tactics from the liberal playbook. Attack the messenger when he offers facts you can’t refute.

Sorry AB but when he crosses the line to lie about you I can’t stand by and just watch this sicko.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 05, 2018:

That is cool AB. You endorse T's hate. I get it. But call it what it is. Conservative hate speech. The hook liberals can hang their hat on when it comes to communication. T is a poster child for what is causing division. And you support him. That is the bottom line. I hope that is not to intellectual for T.

It is not a position but being mean and hating. So many of us are tired of it. I am speaking from backing here not some whimsical idea.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 05, 2018:

I just don’t understand this little quarrel, happening for no good reason.

I’ll admit, I don’t always understand where some are coming from or going to with their comments, but I try to understand the gist of it and go from there. I’m not going to argue interpretation.

Like I said earlier, ya’ll are on the same page (so to speak) and seem to hold the same or very similar views, I don’t get this, but hope ya’ll can work through it.

Kool-aid......argh! I will try to get past that one.

The Logician from now on on October 05, 2018:

You, bless your heart, seem to babble and make things up about anyone who says you make no sense. I’m not the first who can’t understand things you say and you know it. Even your explanations of what you said don’t make sense to me or to many. Is there anyone out there who understands what you mean by things you say? Please anyone, enlighten me.

Ok AB, I’m done.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 05, 2018:

Whoa now! Ya’ll have brought this to the point of me drinking the kool-aid. I don’t think so. Good Grief, give it a rest!

Watch the Red Sox beat the Yankees! Too late, they already did.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 05, 2018:

Do you deny that the "Bigfoot" reference is you and deny that you put no meaningful Bio? Do you deny you have one article published? Do you deny that what I say is true about you?

In your vernacular you spew without the creds to do so. You mock people who are less educated and you mock people who are more educated.

Is anyone capable to voice an opinion different than yours? Without you attacking them personally?

You seem to mock even other conservatives that do not absolutely agree with you. You have AB drinking your hate cool aid. But us real conservatives do not buy into your hate agenda. Even Brad is not up to your standards.

I would like to step aside and let you have your way but enough hate is enough. And guess what, literate people understand what I am saying sorry that it is over your hate filled notions. No one will back you up.

The Logician from now on on October 05, 2018:

Eric, believe what you want, rant all you want, you make no sense at all and if you think you do, well bless your heart.

I brag about Bigfoot? That is suppose to be an example of hate?

Sorry but you make no sense.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 05, 2018:

T. This is a quote of your Bio, if you call it that; " but if you must know more you can write to any office of the FBI for more information on "Tsadjatko".They all know about the legend of Tsadjatko (which is the Quinault Indian name for BIGFOOT)! but I warn you, then the FBI will have YOUR information. :-) " That is not a wink at the end and those are your words, about you. I am just reporting your own braggadocios attitude.

I fought Rose Bird for years and on my birthday she passed in '99. I was crucified for standing up against judicial legislation. That group ruined California. Appointed by Jerry Brown. My creds are unassailable. Before you were of age I battled the Arizona Supreme court for Native Americans while maintaining a base of conserving our constitution.

But you hate us all. You are losing here for you do not stand for anything but hate and offer no solutions except to hate your opponents. This post confirmation is a new age, and you are old baggage.

How about a positive contribution toward solutions. Or was this post too far above your head?

The Logician from now on on October 05, 2018:

I don’t know what you read but that is in no way any description of what I wrote in my profile. You have a serious problem Eric, just where did you practice law, pastor a church and get your Doctorate, on Mars?

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 05, 2018:

Absolutely correct to you. I note from your non-bio you do not like folks who are educated. It seems that you think that hate is a college degree equivalent. This post and comments bring home the reality that you only preach to your choir. (I hope that reference is not too intellectual so as not to be understood by you)

Hate is taught, love and compassion come naturally. And hate once learned is near impossible to change.

Suppose I am conservative. Suppose we have a reason to doubt those Muslims who do not condemn horrible acts in the name of the Muslim faith.

I will not be cow towed to you conservatives that hate like you. I do not stand for hate like you. Even though you claim to be on my side of the isle. You are not. You just hate. You are exactly akin to radical hate groups and by your words you support them.

I am so sorry if that is over your head to understand, and if it is you should back off as you lack the intellectual prowess to be taken seriously.

The Logician from now on on October 05, 2018:

Well Eric it seems you can’t even explain what you mean. Didn’t answer one question. Maybe if you actually paid attention to how I point out the tactics liberals like Joc and anyone else who blindly spews left wing talking points with no desire to vet them and then uses diabolical tactics to divert attention from the truth you’d learn something your doctoral seminar apparently was deficient in teaching you.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 05, 2018:

I wonder why you hate us White, Middle Aged, often fat, successful men with credentials and accomplishments. I do not understand what you do not understand. You battle with JOC claiming a moral and intellectual high ground but cannot understand seriously;

"I taught my children that to give absurdity the time of day is to waste that day.

Stick with a positive message and positive things will come of it. Stick with the negative and ergo negativus."

You really cannot understand that plain Engish with some Latin you could wiki in fifteen seconds.

About 40% of Americans hate neo-conservatives and you pretty much cause that.

Do I need to write this in ESL format? Yes I confess I have taught such and that accomplishment also deserves your mockery.

The liberal agenda mocks us of accomplishment as bigots and haters, you do the same.

The Logician from now on on October 05, 2018:

My brand of hate? Paranoid?

If you actually read my bio then you know exactly why I did it and yes I am paranoid about the internet and you should be too or don’t you know it is full of sickos on forums like this. Who says you have to hold your tongue? You must be making yourself sick.

And if you don’t undrstand anything of what I wrote in my “profile” I can’t help you with that, but maybe you can help me with understanding what you wrote, after all I don’t have a PhD so maybe you can explain what you meant by;

“And he shakes his hands at those who think what he says is news.”

or

“But I do not like you or him giving the bullshit so much credence spending time to debunk it. Really. The fact that Ford is a crackpot needs national focus? What is that guys name Annanetti or something. People read a single line that guy says?? Really. Next folks will vote for the footnote of idiocy Kanpernak.”

Who said anything about Avenatti?

What bullshit? Why doesn’t Ford need national focus? What is Kapernick running for?

or

“I taught my children that to give absurdity the time of day is to waste that day.”

What absurdity? What does give the time of day mean, a way of saying a momentary attention? And how does that waste the whole day?

or

“Stick with a positive message and positive things will come of it. Stick with the negative and ergo negativus.”

What positive message? Any positive message? What negative message? Any negative message? What message?

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 05, 2018:

T you just seem incapable of respect. That is OK. I need to be more patient with someone who writes /// "but if you must know more you can write to any office of the FBI for more information on "Tsadjatko".They all know about the legend of Tsadjatko (which is the Quinault Indian name for BIGFOOT)! but I warn you, then the FBI will have YOUR information. :-)///

Certainly that is more comprehensible than what I write?? Yikes! You are so paranoid that you do not do a bio. And everyone lies here about there own except you who does not give one?

Now take it easy. I like most of your thinking thoughts. I am pretty close to agreement on some of your ideas.

But I am really sick of having to hold my tongue when people from either side are hateful and vitriolic. It is your hate that helps create a divide that we simply to not need. You are a cause of angst. Because a conservative makes mean and ugly remarks I can not criticize or I become a progressive liberal.

I am not buying your brand of hate. Any more than Cortez's.

The Logician from now on on October 05, 2018:

Eric, I never said anyone spoke to me like Elmer Fudd let alone Joc.

I don’t know why you are so offended. Maybe I can clear this up for you. I usually don’t understand anything you say and these comments are no exception. When I read them I actually feel like Elmer Fudd because I can’t get what you say and I guess I am the problem and you are expressing yourself perfectly since you are so accomplished, a lawyer, a preacher, a PhD I must be an Elmer Fudd.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 05, 2018:

No I do not!

I appreciate both of you and what you bring to these discussions.

I don't think ya'll are as far apart on issues as it sometimes appears.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 05, 2018:

AB I assume you side with T. Simply because he is conservative it is OK for him to attack my character like Feinstein did to a fine jurist. Time for a gut check this is looking a lot like hypocrisy. Slam anyone with a different view - sounds like T wants to write a new narrative on PC. "Theirs is bad but my PC is ok"?

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 05, 2018:

Wow that is just like the mocking and off subject that you accuse JOC of. Is that clear. You sew ugly. You hate. If one questions you, you go into insults.

Just read your last post. That is just mean and nasty and not on any topic except to slam me.

Do not taunt the liberals about what you do as a conservative.

The last post of yours is one to keep for all time when you rant about others doing the same. Side does not matter on this one. All can see you.

The Logician from now on on October 05, 2018:

Weww Ewic, I gotta hand it to you, you have once again spoken way above my head as I can’t make Hyde now haiw of what you just said but that’s my bad, how couwd I evew keep up wif the wikes of you, a Twiaw wawyew and a Pweachew. You have a PhD in psychowogy too, wight? I’m suwe I saw you say that befowe in comments. Oh, dat scwewy wabbit!

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 05, 2018:

Now I like our talking heads, especially Rush because as he is adamant about, he is an entertainer. And he shakes his hands at those who think what he says is news.

But I do not like you or him giving the bullshit so much credence spending time to debunk it. Really. The fact that Ford is a crackpot needs national focus? What is that guys name Annanetti or something. People read a single line that guy says?? Really. Next folks will vote for the footnote of idiocy Kanpernak.

I taught my children that to give absurdity the time of day is to waste that day.

Stick with a positive message and positive things will come of it. Stick with the negative and ergo negativus.

The Logician from now on on October 05, 2018:

Eric, I heard her speech too, it was measured and accurate except for her saying she believed Ford’s story only that it wasn’t Kavanaugh. Frankly that is absurd, how can you believe something happened that she got so right except for the perpetrator? I don’t believe Collins believed anything Ford said but she, being the politician she is, wants an out from backlash of women voters if she said she didn’t believe Ford’s whole story. I mean if Collins is right and she imagined Kavanaugh did what someone else did to her she isn’t just mistaken, she is a really sick pup.

Rush had some information today you haven’t found in any mainstream media report!

Blasey Ford’s Camp Tampered with Witnesses!

by Rush Limbaugh - Oct 5,2018

RUSH: There’s a really important story out there that is not being covered. It’s not being covered on even Fox News or Fox Business News. It is a story of massive witness tampering. It is a story about a witness, Leland Keyser, one of the reportedly best friends of Dr. Blasey Ford. Leland Keyser says that she was bullied by another friend of Ford’s and a former FBI agent herself, Monica McLean.

She was bullied. She was told, she was asked to change her story and say that she was in the room with Blasey Ford when Kavanaugh… Well, she was at the event when Kavanaugh supposedly did the dirty against Dr. Ford. She has maintained from the get-go that she doesn’t know what Dr. Ford’s talking about. She wasn’t there.

None of the four “witnesses” that Dr. Ford says were there say they were.

Monica McLean, a former FBI agent and former friend of Blasey Ford, and it was at McLean’s house in Delaware where Blasey Ford wrote the letter to Feinstein! Did you know that? Yes! Blasey Ford was in Delaware with Monica McLean, and some are suggesting (I don’t know if it’s true) that actually Monica McLean might have written the letter. But at least that there was a collaboration, the letter that was sent to Feinstein. You would think this story would be all over the place.

You would think that it would have been mentioned on the Senate floor today when they took the procedural vote, which, by the way, was 51-49 Kavanaugh. I don’t think there were any surprises. A lot of people thought that Murkowski was gonna vote to confirm. I never did. I never did. I thought Murkowski was always gonna stake out this position. Then I saw a story that some 300 female lawyers from Alaska had been leaning on Murkowski.

So she voted “no” and said that Kavanaugh is not the right man at the right time to be on the court. But this is pretty big story that Blasey Ford’s FBI friend Monica McLean was pressuring Leland Keyser to modify her testimony and statement so as to say that she, “Oh, you know what, I just remembered, I was there, I remember that Kavanaugh, I remember.” That’s what they wanted her to do. You thought it was kind of dubious, you thought it might have been a little sketchy that Blasey Ford’s best friend is a retired FBI agent?

We mentioned this to you earlier this week. A former DOJ officials may have ties to the FBI’s attempt to run that coup on Trump. Her name is Monica McLean again, and they were together on July 30th when Ford was writing the letter to Feinstein. They were in Delaware at McLean’s house. Leland Keyser is an ex-wife of Bob Beckel, a former Democrat political operative, Fox News commentator and CNN commentator. They wanted her, they pressured her to “revisit” her statement.

The Wall Street Journal had the story or has the story today. This is witness tampering. This is asking a witness to lie so as to buttress the story told by Dr. Blasey Ford. The pressure came from a former FBI agent again who’s one of the beach buddies of Dr. Ford’s. If this isn’t witness tampering then somebody needs to tell me what it is. Charles Grassley was on Fox. Grassley, as I mentioned at the end of yesterday’s program, Grassley has been on fire. Something has really set him off.

I would think that it would have happened years and years and years ago, but whatever. Something has really set him off now. He’s going after the press, accusing them face-to-face of outright bias. He’s accusing the Democrats of being insincere, doing great harm to the Senate. One of Grassley’s points is (and John Cornyn’s, too): If we’re gonna get rid of somebody on the basis of an allegation with no proof, what are we doing for every future nominee that comes before this committee?

If the new standard is that all a nominee has to be is accused of something and that kills the nomination, then where are we headed? We’re headed exactly where the Democrats want. Just to refresh your memory, Blasey Ford and Leland Keyser were close… I mean, some say best friends, at the time of the alleged attack by Kavanaugh.

When Keyser’s denial was brought up at the hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Blasey Ford attempted to discredit her by saying (imitation), “Well, she’s got health problems. She had problems. I don’t know, but she was not well. I felt really bad for her.” It turns out that Leland Keyser’s a former pro golfer. She does have back and neck problems but not mental health issues.

Monica McLean, again, Blasey Ford’s lifelong best friend and the woman Blasey Ford allegedly coached prior to taking a polygraph test. This Monica McLean is all over this story. We’ve only learned her name in the past week or so. And according to reports, Monica McLean was at Blasey Ford’s side in the hearing room before she testified. She was. I have now seen photos.

Anyway, Grassley said on Fox & Friends this morning that there is evidence in the FBI report that other witnesses were leaned on by allies of Blasey Ford as well, not just Leland Keyser! Other witnesses were leaned on. That means every senator has seen that. Every senator that’s read the report has seen this! And it apparently isn’t changing any votes.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 05, 2018:

I am not sure when a weird thing happened to me. Undergrad? Grad school? Trial lawyer, Preacher or maybe just dad. I like to open my mind and really listen. True that half the time I stop listening when some idiot is talking.

But that fine lady from Maine I think gave one of the most cogent speeches I have heard in a long time. After I heard, stopping outside of store to hear it. I looked it up and I think she is a moderate Republican. I hesitate to brand her in a niche'. Hanging out in Maine for awhile I found them to be a lot like Arizonans, 2,000 miles away but real Americans red or blue.

As always proud to stand for the red, white and blue.

Brad on October 05, 2018:

AB

Sad but true.

Actually, if they are able to prevent Kavanaugh from becoming a SC justice, the SCOTUS will work better for the people with an 8 justice court. Because it will take at least 5 justices against 3 justices, instead of the old 5-4.

I have always thought that simple majority decisions by the SCOTUS was hardly ever a good decision, and that was without any partisanship in the court.

We don't pass amendments to the constitution by a simple majority, then why should we do it for SCOTUS decisions. These decisions become the law of the land, and until they are overturned or modified we are stuck with them.

That to me is not a good deal. Roe is a perfect example of a SCOTUS 5-4 decision that while it adjudicated the issue, it didn't make a satisfactory decision, otherwise it wouldn't have been the center of every presidential election, and especially this last one.

To me there are two major flaws in Roe.

1. The court didn't make judicial notice notice of when life begins. That is the core of the dispute every election.

2. The three trimester duration for abortion is much to long for the average abortion. I do agree that circumstances outside the control of the women does warrant exceptions, such as rape or medical complications, but to make it the oops fix is not.

And what should have been done from the beginning is to make adoption of these babies easy and beneficial to the mother and those people that adopt them. Adoption would be nice, but many of these babies may have some serious health issues due to the health of the mother, like drug addiction etc.

Just my opinion.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 05, 2018:

Brad,

This is not only an embarrassment to our Country, it is a disgraceful continuation of the steady chipping away at our foundation.

It never slows, it only gets uglier, as the radical left chips away with anything they can get their useless hands on, in an effort to destroy this Republic.

Lady Liberty nor Lady Justice are safe!

Brad on October 05, 2018:

AB

I just saw a clip of cory booker, nj dem senator.

He talked about a moral moment, and the partisan in the Kavanaugh

How did he and the other democrat senators on the committee find a moral moment, and it was them that made it partisan.

They used this skimpy, no corroboration accusation as a political weapon because he also said.

That it doesn't matter whether Kavanaugh is guilty or innocence because this wasn't a trial.

This is the democrat political platform, and this is what they want their leadership to make America. They also don't apply this message equally as in the case of dem primary winner Keith Ellison. No one is investigating him and his accuser knows all the details, and she has proof.

So if you are a conservative - Accusations are applied a Guilty and carry the same weight as if there was an arrest, a trial and a guilty decision.

But, if you are a liberal, then you are Innocent as if their was no accusation at all. There is no need to investigate, arrest, go to trial, or get a court decision.

The who 21st century social justice platform of the democrats was based on equality.Yet there is no equality in how the same acts are taken between a democrat or a conservative.

The correct equation is that Democrats = Republicans = everyone.

That is why Lady Liberty is blindfolded.

However that is not how the democrats played the Kavanaugh nomination. And that is not how they are playing the Keith Ellison assault charges.

The truth about equality is both sides are treated equal and if they are not then equality fails, and changes to a less than or greater than relation.

Finally, the democrats craft their partisanship and applaud their accusation = guilt because they say this is a job application, and not a trial.

However, it is patently discrimination, and protection from job discrimination has not been protected in the Kavanaugh case.

When judge Kavanaugh was nominated ALL the democrats said we are going to vote NO on him because he is president Trump's pick, and that was before the hearing ever started.

If that isn't the definition of discrimination, then what is the definition?

That is the

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 05, 2018:

It is an embarrassment, but then the same women behind all of this thought it was a good idea to clothe themselves in hats and outfits resembling a part exclusive to the female anatomy and parade about, expecting to be taken seriously, soooo.....

The Logician from now on on October 05, 2018:

Mike, in the 80’s no teenager associated themselves with right or left, most probably didn’t even know or care who was president. But you are right, anyone who isn’t embarrassed by and can’t see through what the Dems have done, are doing, isn’t a thinking person,

Readmikenow on October 05, 2018:

Isn't it interesting that Brett Kavanaugh is accused in his youth of only going after liberal Democrat women? How did he know to avoid girls that would become conservative and Republican? This entire process has been an absolute national embarrassment caused by the Democrat party.

The Logician from now on on October 05, 2018:

Recent poll says Trumps support by women is now up 6%!

Gee, I wonder how that could be? Ya think women care about their husbands and sons lives being ruined by false accusations and if Democrats get elected that will be the rule, guilty until proven innocent!

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 05, 2018:

Leftist women....there are real and legitimate cases of sexual abuse and ya'll are doing great, great damage!

PLEASE STOP!

http://time.com/5416105/kavanaugh-protest/

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 05, 2018:

I have a very hard time understanding this blind following/resistance/anger.....

Surely, there is one person in these crowds that has considered the possibility of this happening to a MAN in their life, someone they love...admire...respect?

Would they want him to be heard?

Would they want him to have a voice?

If there was absolutely no evidence of wrong-doing on his part, not a shred, would they be accepting of a mob of confused people chanting he belongs in jail, among other things, as they work to incite the mob?

Would they want their voice to be heard in their defense of this man they love...admire...respect?

These things I ponder!

http://time.com/5416105/kavanaugh-protest/

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 03, 2018:

Oh shoot T, you should have shared this comment to ‘A Blue Wave Will Destroy America, America article, it fits perfectly with the blue theme.

The Logician from now on on October 03, 2018:

Yeah after the next election the headlines will be:

Dems shoot themselves in foot with the new face of the Democrat party, Blasey Ford. Blue wave has turned into just the blues!

They should make a movie about Feinstein’s part in loosing the midterms. Call it “The lady sings the blues.” While she waves goodbye.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 03, 2018:

That makes sense!

The Logician from now on on October 03, 2018:

Yes Fox News poll: Republicans make gains in top Senate races

All because of the Democrat’s sham on Kavanaugh - anyone say backfire? How about, Dems,

“HERE’S YOUR SIGN!”

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 03, 2018:

I've been out of the loop today. Any breaking news/bombshells? A vote? ;)

The Logician from now on on October 03, 2018:

Hyperbole Brad, I know what you said.

Here we go. Click to read Arizona sex crimes Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell's report to GOP Senators on Dr. Ford's testimony last week:

https://bit.ly/2DRawXA

Brad on October 03, 2018:

T

I never said blind, I said impaired vision.

Clearly she isn't blind, but I questioned the glasses.

It could have also been a prop for the hearing!

But the dems would probably take your version.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 03, 2018:

*liberalism :)

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 03, 2018:

Did any of you catch the story about the College of the Ozarks, aka Hard Work U, on the Fox News Channel?

Wow....so awesome!

These kids are taking their college courses, while working right there on a working campus with gardens-to-table, milk cows, etc. and graduating with work experience....completely debt free!

Additionally and more importantly, they are learning and embracing Faith, Freedom, Patriotism and hard work. (this is the school that took a stand and stopped using Nike products)

Such a refreshing, welcome change from all the crazy chaos going on in our Country right now.

They also have an amazing band which plays the Patriotic songs that I grew up on!

There's hope for our future, far removed from iberalism!

LOVE IT!

The Logician from now on on October 03, 2018:

Journalism is dead, Eric you are right.

Just like everything liberalism touches, it dies.

They won’t stop until they make America DEAD! or we make liberalism DEAD!

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 03, 2018:

When did the concept of "Op-Ed" die? Way back studying journalism and writing for a tiny paper it was a huge deal to label it that. Meaning analysts and opinions or paraphrasing was taboo if it did not do a major declaration that it is an "Op-Ed". They even separated it and created a space for it.

Now it is so bad it is hearsay of an opinion which is the headline. Interview a fellow with an opinion and that is the "news"? The fact that you interviewed him is news?

It is just a natural fact that dems. are better at this than reps.

The Logician from now on on October 03, 2018:

Now that I think about it AB I had a dream that seemed so real 50 years later I recalled it as having really happened. I only figured out it had to be a recollection of a dream when I shared it with someone in the dream and they convinced me it never happened.

That’s the only one but for all I know there could be other recollections I have that were dreams but I haven’t tested them.

Very interesting point Brad, AB.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 03, 2018:

Oh gosh T, that's s t r e t c h i n g... we don't want to look like Dems. ;)

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 03, 2018:

Interesting.

When I was a kid, I had a recurring dream. I had it so often that at times I'd have to remind myself that it did not really happen, it was only a dream.

I don't know what, if anything, happened to Dr. Ford.

At this point, from all we've learned or haven't learned, I believe a dream/a scene/a nightmare... has played out in her head so often that over time, she stopped reminding herself that it isn't real.

.

The Logician from now on on October 03, 2018:

Brad, so what if it is discovered she was practically blind? That makes it worse for Kavanaugh, the Dems will say he tried to rape a blind person! That’s even worse!

Brad on October 02, 2018:

AB

Here is a different direction on the Dr. Ford testimony?

How good was her eyesight in 1982? She wore glasses during the testimony?

Was there an eyesight issue? Who knows, I think I am the only one to ask the question.

I was reminded of a story about cross examination of an eye witness. And it turns not on the question of truth, but on the questionable eyesight of the witness.

The story used the Pope as the virtue of Truth, as he wouldn't knowingly lie. The lawyer drills down to the Pope's eyesight and it was then determined that he was not a good eye witness because his eyesight didn't permit him to see clearly at that distance.

Just a thought.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 02, 2018:

No please don’t go off the deep end with the crazies.....no ‘special’ hats, except for MAGA...lol

The Logician from now on on October 02, 2018:

Eric, I think you’d look good in that. You are photogenicital.

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 02, 2018:

I remember getting a bit riot inclined against the Vietnam War involvement.

I do not get Vagina hats being something a young boy should see, But we have discussed burning our flag and Jimmy Hendrix wearing it. Intellectual stuff there. But I am not going to wear a floppy or stiff male organ on my head.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 02, 2018:

No we do not and I want to keep it that way!

Good luck STOPPING the socialist. People are idiots, Trump isn’t a typical politician, he is actually keeping promises made to the people and we are all benefiting!

In other news.....I am hoping McConnell calls for a vote on Kavanaugh right away, like tomorrow, after having those loud activist women in his face today at the airport , hopefully it lit a fire in him to wrap this thing up.

Brad on October 02, 2018:

AB

So true. At least Florida got their sort of high speed train, while the only things moving on the Ca high speed train is the cost, and the finish date. And if only the high speed train would move that fast:)

And so far Florida doesn't have a personal state income tax.

:)

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 02, 2018:

I get it Brad, we can't give up.

Many states appear to be embracing Californian politics, all while California continues to push destructive measures which will finish ya'll off!

Florida, apparently wants to be just like Cali, the big Gov candidates are doing well here! It makes no sense to me.

Brad on October 02, 2018:

AB

I wish I could, but like I can't ignore the sound of crickets, I can't ignore the anti Trumper.

There is one woman running democrat in CA and her big hash tag is STOP TRUMP

And you see the anti Trumpers on Hp lapping this kind of platform like free french fries.

She wants to raise taxes substantially, and she wants to support a national takeover of healthcare $32 Trillion of it!

My point is that if we have people like Fair in government, and she did work for the government, maybe still does, who knows, that is very dangerous.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 02, 2018:

Wow...she's a real piece of work, but let's not concern ourselves with evil individuals such as her, when there are Trumps and Kavanaughs in this world, which must be targeted, framed, vilified and destroyed.....

If all this crap which is taking place.....I understand that Julie Swetnick, the client of pimpin' Attorney Avenatti, is backing off her tall tale....if all of this doesn't help some people to see the light (or rather the swamp, cesspool.... which exists) nothing will!

Brad on October 02, 2018:

AB

FYI

"About Security Studies

From weapons of mass destruction to cyber-warfare, environmental degradation, human security and terrorism, our Security Studies major blazes multiple paths to a course of study that reflects a your unique area of interest. If you choose this interdisciplinary major, you can choose an emphasis from four different areas – biology, chemistry, computer science/mathematics, and physics – while developing a solid foundation in history and political science."

"Fair received her Ph.D. from the Department of South Asian Languages and Civilization at the University of Chicago in 2004. Prior to that she received a masters of arts and bachelor of science from the same university]

Fair is a Provost's Distinguished Associate Professor in the Peace and Security Studies Program (SSP) within Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service."

AB

The telltale here is the U of Chicago!

-------------------------------------------------

"Personal controversies

In January 2017, Fair was involved in a Twitter dispute with Asra Q. Nomani. In response to Nomani's tweet that as a Muslim, she voted for President Trump, Fair tweeted that she had "written [Nomani] off as a human being" and that Nomani had "pimped herself out to all media outlets." Nomani responded by filing a complaint with Georgetown University, Fair's employer, alleging discrimination and harassment.

In May 2017, Fair began an altercation with white nationalist Richard B. Spencer at a gym in Alexandria, Virginia. While the two were working out, Fair approached Spencer and accused him of being a Nazi, along with a number of other accusations, leading a third gym patron to intervene on behalf of him. This incident resulted in Spencer's membership being terminated by the manager of the gym.

In January 2018, Fair was involved in an incident at Frankfurt Airport. When her bag was flagged for possibly containing explosives, it was searched and German Federal Police instructed Fair that she would have to dispose of a liquid deodorant or transfer it to her checked bag. German police stated that Fair was uncooperative, as she accused them of sexism and of being Nazis and thugs, and directed expletives at them. Fair was charged with slander under Germany's defamation law. She subsequently published an article on HuffPost partially rejecting the police account of the incident.

In the midst of the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination hearings in September 2018, Fair, referring to Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, tweeted that they were "entitled white men justifying a serial rapists' arrogated entitlement" and that they "deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps." She made additional comments expressing support for post-mortem castration and corpse desecration. At least one student expressed the fear that Fair's comments would cause students, who hold opposing views, to feel threatened. Georgetown University responded by saying that her expressions did not violate the university's policies. "

AB

She has been working for the CIA and defense systems, so she kill actually kill someone:)

---------------------------------

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 02, 2018:

She is considered 'distinguished' don't you know.

The Security Studies Program.....whatever the heck that is!

I wouldn't want her anywhere near anything or anyone I needed 'secured'.

Do America's kids/young adults stand a chance with these lunatic radical types 'teaching' them? NO!

Brad on October 02, 2018:

AB

What subject is she teaching at Georgetown?

is it "Extreme Left Democrat Ranting and Whining"

or is it

"My role model is Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill Clinton"

or

"Femanism is Nazism without the men"

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 02, 2018:

Ugh Blumenthal....don't get me started again! :)

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 02, 2018:

If that left you cold Brad, not sure how this one is going to make you feel...certainly won't be warm and fuzzy.

Actual tweet of Georgetown Professor Christine Fair:

"Look at thus chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist's arrogated entitlement.

All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps.

Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes."

Hopefully this horrible person has lost her Twitter account and her job!

She should be banned from ever being in the midst of students again, as she goes forth with her miserable life.

If the FBI is investigating and questioning anyone right now, it should be this witch!

These ugly (attitude), nasty feminists make me ill and they are an embarrassment to me and to most women (at least to women that think for themselves)

This is outrageous, demented and sick!

The Logician from now on on October 02, 2018:

Eric it was Blumenthal, the scummiest of the scum. Trump ripped him apart for his stolen valor in his recent appearance in West Virginia. He ripped the press and the dem sham too - you should listen to it. He just destroyed them. No President has ever spoken truth to power like he did there ripping the media, the corrupt Democrats and guys like Blumenthal who is a disgrace on so many levels.

Brad on October 02, 2018:

AB

That mention of Kavanaugh throwing ice just leaves me cold:)

Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on October 02, 2018:

Wasn't it some dude named Blumsomething who lied and lied about his heroic war activities. But wasn't that guy wasn't that the guy who asked about; false in one false in all?

The Logician from now on on October 02, 2018:

If Kavanaugh isn’t confirmed I wonder how long it will be before every Democrat in congress has to fend off uncorroborated accusations of sexual assault from hundreds of Republican women? Good way to keep control of Congress and force all the Dems to step down. Maybe the Koch brothers can pay off enough women? Or just gofundmes? Ya think? Congress still under comtrol of Republicans now can pass a “tit for tat” law (no reference to women intended) to protect the innocent accusers! ;-)

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 01, 2018:

Judge Kavanaugh has now been accused of being an ice thrower (not making this up)

Last week, there were fingers pointed at him for everything from groping to spiking punch to running rape rooms (with absolutely not a shred of evidence presented)

But now they've got him......he was in a bar in the 80s and he threw ice. Hotdog, there's evidence; a police report!

The treatment of this man is beyond what Clarence Thomas experienced, when he spoke of his own personal "high tech lynching", as he sought his seat on the Supreme Court.

Brad on October 01, 2018:

AB

shhh, don't tell anyone you are doing that:) my score is 28

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 01, 2018:

I will check it out!

Brad on October 01, 2018:

AB

I just stopped being nice, I just published

"Dr Ford is a player not a victim"

hash tag Political Dirty Bomb

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 01, 2018:

That sums up the DNC quite nicely Brad....if we are being nice and we are! ;)

Brad on October 01, 2018:

AB

DNC

D Distract

N Negate

C Complain

The Logician from now on on October 01, 2018:

Mike, you are right, no matter what the outcome, even if it was absolutely proven beyond any doubt the Ford is lying she will be set for life. She could be confirmed by a psychologist to be psychotic and that would qualify her to rise to a position of leadership in the Democrat party by appointment or election to join the company if Pelosi who says she speaks to dead people, Dirty Harry Reid who is a proven pathological (made rich by his position in congress) LIAR, and of course Hiliary and our former Liar in Chief, peice be upon him, Obama.

A B Williams (author) from Central Florida on October 01, 2018:

Great observations all, gentlemen and through all of these distracting dazzling balls, as the Dems continue to get their way (with a lot of help from their friends) Ford gets to become a millionaire to boot!?!

Someone once said, perhaps it was on this thread, the writers here at HP couldn't top this story!