Updated date:

Communications Are Not Conflicts

Author:
communications-or-conflicts

I am opening this hub with what I deem to be a relevant question. What is the premise or purpose for or to communicate and what is needed? Successful interchange requires Integrity, honesty; ascertaining that the intent to communicate is first perceived as a virtuous endeavor, I will be honest, first with myself and then to whom I am communicating with. The desire is inside, but must now manifest outwardly for successful communications.

The human experience is however, much too complicated for cut and dry, or copy, cut and paste answers, thinking things through can be a cliche or the forgotten measure to ensure balance is effective, looking for justice without balance is when justice seems to be the silence that is quiet; the Imbalance within injustice proclaims that justice is rendered and, it is not. Balance needed in contrast of ideas is not dependent upon comparisons made towards the attempt to justify.

This question is being asked but, I think I should have a working understanding of any or all questions that I can possibly ask; or I should evaluate or examine my motive for asking. Do I or am I seeking information in order that I may attempt to answer my own question, or am I merely attempting in my own words to answer. Questions are designed and engineered to be and always will require a precise and clear for thought answer. Unanswered questions only lead to the lack of understanding of the thing in question. Issues always need answers for solace and peaceful dialogue.

Declarative statements are not complete, nor do they provide absolute resolutions, but keep conversations moving towards sorting through premises for answers. As a matter of fact directives, do not solve issues. Questions stimulate dialogue and can minimize debate. Debate comes with the idea of put down, either it will be one or the other who abhors the components of the conversation. Look for put downs in debates, but never look for them in active, well-intentioned dialogue which set the precedent for communications; strengthening the terms of articulation, not to argue right or wrong, but resolve issues towards corrections.

Debates are thought out in “pro and con” form, with the argument as its central theme, whereas, dialogue carries the connotations of correction geared towards resolve for effective communications. Likened to the idea of the effectual fervent prayer of the righteous avails much. What is prayer, but a conversation you choose to have with God, what are you doing when you pray? Communicating! Only you know if your own speech is truly effective, repentance before speaking to God, places all breath under correction to eliminate all dirt from contaminating breath, words and communication via hearing things contrary lodged in the air.

I have failed in many communication attempts and challenges, but in retrospect “I repent” for what? Because, now I realize that failed communications produce more sorrow. I am not alluding to the ability to articulate clearly or enunciate properly, it is about content and context, not just speech. The attributes of conversation that the mind seems to sleep through, because of the override of other intrigues and factors of conversation.

This writing is not merely about communications, it is the purge to the very core of the premise. First there has to be breath as a resident of the body, no breath, no physical life. Breath produces breath, it is a process, inhale and exhale uniquely synchronized for output and input, or just for internal purpose alone, we call it meditation, you know thinking. Does breath help you to think or do words, or both? You will need breath for the human experience to think. Here is an exercise: sit still and keep your mouth closed, determine what are you thinking about? The mind is clear until you think of a word. The word will open up a catalog of thought, just one word and focus. Words produce words which contribute to thought, any word associated with the word thought on.

Can I depend on getting outer breath before believing in inner breath put inside of me for a purpose that atmosphere diseased by hateful and infectious words are at war for relevance. Good words are not at war, but they rest in peace. Peace is where all goodness resides. War and warriors have no true peace because they are always on the battlefield. The war of words are always conflictive and combative. Until war is aligned with war and warriors fight their final battle, the war of words will not cease. It is an individual choice to choose the words inspired by breath. Turning from the battles is not the easiest thing to do because troublemakers are always at large. The smallest thought I think I have ever encountered is war. It is such a small minded idea, and it is not a small world after all, peace is power packed.

Do we attempt to get inner breath outside of the body before inner thought occurs? Those who believe in the Holy Spirit becoming a resident inside, haven’t yet believed towards thinking the process through. It is a tradition to ask the Holy Spirit to fill one with itself, but what does the Spirit have to give that is more than what we have? The Holy Spirit has a Holy plan for breath. Holy breath joins human breath that has been infected by unrepentant sin, that holds the breath in captivity to lies, both heard and written throughout time and ones journey.

The holy script inspired by the Spirit is breath that affects the entire body and mind. The remedy for infected breath lies in the power to breath sin free under the power of a repentant breath. Repentance does not know sin, unrepentance knows sin and how to destroy both outer and inner breath. The Holy Spirit has more to do with breathing correctly in order to speak correctly, and therefore live correctly, it is how to choose the right words for the breath to propel the speech pattern for successful utterance. (Romans 8:26)

“Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.”

The Spirit helps infirmed breath to be healed; to be informed breath that hears and to promote speaking correctly and in accordance with the principles outlined and specified in the Scriptures, we don’t even know what we should pray for as we ought; This verse says we ought to know, but we don’t. The Spirit aligns breath to recognize the power of the tongue to assist the mouth in uttering that which is contrasted as death or life, without breath inside utterance is not even possible, but the Spirit helps that infirmity towards repentance and a life that sins less and less. Repentance will open the gates to utterance that will correctively, progressively and continuously lead to the truth. The infirmity wasn’t just sin, it was unrepentant sin, in other words, not repenting of sin, and covering breath with lies, to have a cloak for sin. (Proverbs 18:21)

Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.

How and why do I desire to hear and speak something that I think? Is it capable of affecting life towards functionality, I would desire to both hear and speak (write), for the ultimate good. How do I receive the information which I desire to speak or write? How did I hear it and from whom did I hear it? Christianity has taught me that there is only one voice to listen to besides my own, but that I need my own voice as well after listening. (2 Peter 1:20)

Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

It is not the prophecy of scripture that is of private interpretation, it is the revelation regarding it that one can apply privately.


© 2021 mabelhenry

Comments

Mark Tulin from Palm Springs, California on July 29, 2021:

Well said.

Related Articles