Skip to main content

The Big Bang Theory versus Real-Life Physicists


Reel Life vs. Real Life

Once we step outside Mythbusters, the portrayal of scientists on TV encounters a steepest descent on the realism manifold that would shame the best of conjugate gradient algorithms (yes, including simulated annealing. Duh). The most egregious offender is, of course, the sitcom. From the defective social skills and poor grooming to the obtuse humor and poor grooming, it's like these shows purposefully exaggerate nerdy character traits for comedic effect!

We here at LabKitty don't play scientists on TV, but we are scientists in real life. As such, we have a vested interest in how Hollywood portrays those of us in the rough trade. Case in point: CBS nerdfest The Big Bang Theory.


Five Ways in Which the Guys on TBBT are Different from Real-Life Physicists

For those of you not familiar with The Big Bang Theory, the show revolves around the exploits of two CalTech physicists and the arrival of comely new neighbor Penny who turns their life into a living hell with those little tops and tight capris.

TBBT hits many nerd points spot-on, and does a pretty decent job with the techno-jargon (although please stop saying "complex Mandelbrot set." Nobody says "complex Mandelbrot set." It's just "Mandelbrot set"). But, as the saying goes, birds gotta fly, fish gotta swim, and LabKitty gotta eat those birds and fish. Having reviewed Seasons 1 & 2, our inner nerd demands we point out:


  1. Real physicists are not incapable of interaction with the opposite sex. Although this quirk provides the driving premise of the show, let's look at the track record of some of the physics Elder Gods, shall we? Einstein, Bohr, Oppenheimer, Swinger, Dirac, Schrodinger, Fermi. Married. Yep, all of 'em. Einstein was married twice (the second time to his cousin - hawt!). Neils Bohr was a mountain climber and played football and had six children with his wife Margrethe, one of whom won the Nobel Prize just like his dad. Oppenheimer was married and had a squeeze on the side who killed herself when he broke it off. Julian Schwinger - pretty much the poster boy for Nerd Power - was married and drove a Cadillac (for you kids, that's what a "Lexis" was called back in the 50's). Dirac - the introvert's introvert - married Eugene Wigner's sister (the sample of their awkward love letters that Graham Farmelo includes in his recent biography of Dirac makes LabKitty sound like Smoove B). When Schrodinger won the Nobel in 1933, he took his wife to the ceremony and left his (pregnant) mistress at home. And if you think hot chicks don't dig nerds, we've got two words for you: Laura Fermi.
  2. Real physicists (and the science world in general) are not enamored with string theory. Some of us go days, weeks, or our entire career without thinking about it. String theory seems to be Hollywood's latest darling. Before that, the go-to technobabble was Chaos Theory (Jurassic Park, Butterfly effect, Dasavatharam) or General Relativity (Contact, Event Horizon, Sound of Thunder) or tachyons (Prince of Darkness, any Star Trek episode) or atomic mutant everything (Godzilla, Gamera, Earth versus Soup). Hey! Hollywood! Knock if off! Next time you need some accurate sciencey-sounding dialog you give us a call. Capice?
  3. Real physicists do not have swank apartments anywhere close enough to Los Angeles to be considered "living in LA." What, the broken elevator is supposed to shout "affordable building" ? Affordable apartment buildings in LA have dead hobos in the lobby. The only way anyone living on an academic's salary (or Penny, come to think of it) could afford that stylin' pad and not require a plane to get to work would be if they split the place with five people or sold drugs in the parking lot.
  4. Real physicists don't eat in the cafeteria.You either eat a) in your office or b) in your lab. You eat in your office if you're holding office hours so you can condescendingly wave your sammich at students while they hatch their Machiavellian schemes to obtain points on the last exam. And you eat in your lab to reduce the possibility of stuff blowing up. As a bonus, eating in your lab makes a mockery of the university Safety Officer, who is the only person faculty despise more than each other.
  5. Real physicists do not spend evenings playing WoW, Second Life, or Halo, or rant on the internet regarding the inaccuracies of fictional physicists from TV shows. Sheesh.


We've got the ball rolling, but there's much more ahead. Perhaps this is the perfect time to go get yourself some whiskey and S'mores, and a rockin' LabKitty mug for dunkin'.

Check out the LabKitty store for all your geek gear needs. LabKitty -- Stuff for Smart Cats!

Update: Gah! The Hubpages bot keeps deleting my linkys to fine LabKitty products (what the dang heck, Hubpages?). So you will have to do it old school. Copypasta this in your brower: and you're golden. It's like an adventure!

The Big Bang Theory Season 3 - Hey! Wait! We got some new complaints!

W00t! We finally made it to Season 3! (what can we say? We're children of Netflix). This means we can add S3 episode-specific whining to our general observations observed above. Season 3 parity violations include the following:

  1. The Electric Can Opener Fluctuation (S3/E1): Sheldon cannot resign then simply pop back in for his old job when he changes his mind. These days you can't swing a dead cat without hitting an unemployed postdoc, bred by the thousands by a higher education machine that provides no place for them to go. If a faculty member were to resign, his/her seat would be filled forever and irrevocably by the close of business day. Heck, these days you can't take a long lunch without returning to find strangers in your office with measuring tapes and carpet samples.
  2. The Jiminy Conjecture (S3/E2): Lewis Black's entomologist character cannot be forced out of the university simply because they want his lab space. One word: tenure. Actually, two words: tenure and lawsuit. If the character is indeed a world-famous entomologist senior faculty member, he surely has tenure, which means he gets a paycheck and lab space regardless of whether he is vibrant and productive, jaded and phoning-it-in, or living in an iron lung and being fed jello by a graduate student. As a result of the tenure system, you can't swing a dead cat these days without hitting an unemployed postdoc, bred by the thousands by a higher education machine that provides no place for them to go. We may have mentioned this already.
  3. The Pirate Solution (S3/E4): Raj is an astrophysicist. Sheldon is a theoretical physicist. Suggesting that Raj would be useful to Sheldon as a co-worker simply because both are physicists is like saying a hooker would be useful to a mechanic because they both work on cars.
  4. The Plimpton Stimulation (S3/E21): The TBBT writers display here a fundamental misunderstanding of academia. Think: cats, not dogs. As far as academics are concerned, other academics are the people who shredded your publications and got your grant applications rejected via anonymous review. They are the reason you didn't get tenure; they are the bastards who are squatting on lab space that is rightfully yours. University faculty basically long for the day when academia operates like that alternate Star Trek universe with evil goatee Spock, where you advance by killing whomever is in your way. So the only reason Sheldon would have permitted Plimpton to stay with them would have been to facilitate disposing of her body, and the only reason Leonard would have a copy of Plimpton's book would be to stab her picture on the back cover in the eyes with voodoo pins.
  5. The Staircase Implementation (S3/E22): We have now established that the elevator in the apartment building was rendered non-functional approximately seven years prior. If we may channel our inner Sheldon (or outer Sheldon, as it were) it's entirely unlikely that the elevator would remain unserviceable for this entire period as it is a clear violation of the American with Disabilities act of 1990. The ADA guidelines specify that unless your facility is less than three stories tall or has fewer than 3000 square feet per floor, your elevators must conform to the ADA accessibility guidelines (ADAAG) based on the 1961 edition of ANSI A117 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities code. Requirements include:
  6. Call buttons that are a minimum of 0.75 inches in diameter
  7. Braille plates next to buttons and at entrance jambs
  8. A cab large enough to accommodate a wheelchair and a 360-degree turn
  9. Elevator must, you know, actually go up and down

A Cautionary Tale

We must admit Season 3 has left us uneasy, as if the writing began to change at about the halfway point. The guys unknowingly eat hash cookies? Sheldon and Leonard in a ball tank? Drunk Sheldon? Plimpton turns out to be a sex kitten? The audience going WOOO? Really TBBT? You're really resorting to these hackneyed sitcom devices? Not to mention a pervasive lechery that seems to be consuming the episodes, whereas in the first two seasons it seemed to be a little more playful. We're not offended by sex jokes - we're not prudes by any stretch of the imagination - but we are offended by lazy writing. If we want to see a bunch of lecherous guys ape their way through unfunny jokes we'll watch C-SPAN.

We'll revisit this when Season 4 makes it to Netflix, crossing our fingers that these missteps do not portend a more ominous decline. For now, we shall leave you with this cautionary Polaroid.

Scroll to Continue

The Big Bang Theory Season 4

More Fodder for our Critical Acumen

W00t! We finally got around to watching Season 4! (What can we say? MIT released all of Herb Gross' calculus lectures on iTunes so we've been kinda busy).

Anyhoo, we are now in a position to evaluate our Season 3 shark-jumping concerns. Long story short: compared to S3, the highs in S4 are higher and the lows are lower. In other words, the show's mean is unchanged but the variance has increased. (Ha! Little joke there for the nerds.) Still, we were pleasantly surprised.

The bright spot of S4 is the introduction of neurobiologist and Sheldon's not-girlfriend Amy Farrah Fowler (henceforth: AFF) played by the delightful Mayim Bialik (TV's Blossom!). AFF is probably the most socially dysfunctional character on the show, and that's saying something. Our experience is that folks in the biological sciences are generally better-adjusted socially, or at least better-adjusted than physicists. Although the neurobiologists we know do have an unnerving habit of eating lunch while simultaneously digging though some Lovecraftian pile of brain-themed experimental goop.

Aside: Mayim Bialik actually has a Ph.D. in Neuroscience. It's nice to see someone from the rough trade doing something productive in the real world for a change.

The introduction of AFF provides some much-needed balance to the male-heavy cast, and offers ample opportunity for awkward girl talk among AFF, Penny, and Bernadette (Howard's squeak toy cum fiancée played by wonderful Melissa Rauch). Apparently the writers have just been full-to-bursting with ovulation and shoe humor all these years. Go figure.

Aside: Melissa Rauch doesn't really talk that way IRL.

High-profile S4 cameos include Katee Sackhoff, George Takei, Steve Wozniak, Levar Burton, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and Brian Greene. They also scored Eliza Dushku, Keith Carradine and Jessica Walter for guest episodes. Kudos to TBBT for becoming the next big thing on TV that they can command this sort of talent. Fortunately, these spots were mostly well done - we remind you that the Special Guest Star Episode is a classic shark-jump maneuver, right up there with They Did It and It Was All A Dream. That being said, it would be nice to see Jessica Walter cast in parts other than variations on Lucille Bluth - the woman won a Golden Globe, fer Cat's sake.

Aside: Katee Sackhoff doesn't seem to be getting much work after BSG. What's up with that? Are nerds still blaming her for how Ron Moore ended the series? Shame on you, nerds.

Lastly, S4 brings the return of Raj's sister Priya (played by the stunningly-gorgeous Aarti Mann) for another go-round with Leonard. You know, we can't help but notice that for a comic-book reading, Star Trek quoting, Magic:The Gathering-playing, asthmatic nerd physicist, Leonard's life is not really the sexual wasteland one might expect. Big bang, indeed.

Let's see, what can we nitpick in Season 4 to maintain our nerd cred...

  1. The Apology Insufficiency: FBI agents do not, as a rule, look like Eliza Dushku. Don't ask.
  2. The Benefactor Factor: While a two-photon microscope is an actual thing and they're expensive, they're not quite so expensive that you would need to schmooze big-shot university donors to buy one. That's more on the level of an fMRI facility or a cyclotron or one of those ginormous centrifuges used to model earthen dams (like this 400 g-ton monster at UCB. Yikes, if this thing ever tears loose from its foundations, it just might hurl Boulder back to the real world. But we kid the hippies).
  3. The Cohabitation Formulation: AFF is not going to be able to localize the region of Penny's brain that is active when she cries using scalp EEG. The spatial resolution of such technology is simply insufficient to resolve the limbic structures that likely participate in the response. Such localization is possible, but the necessary equipment would barely fit inside Penny's apartment. Of course, if she was willing to agree to a more invasive procedure the equipment gets much smaller, albeit inviting complications like encephalitis and law enforcement.

Lastly, as a general S4 note, the only way a gorgeous Indian lawyer would hook up with a nerd like Leonard was if she was having green card problems. Then again, maybe Priya is just using Leonard to cover her bases in case she ever needs an Amicus brief on something a lawyer wouldn't understand, like, say, polynomials or ethics. (Ha! We kid the lawyers. Please don't sue us.)

The Ugly

Alas, S4 wasn't without its missteps. The less said about Wolowicz's robot or Sheldon's brussels sprout experiment the better. We'll just pretend those episodes didn't happen (what is this? Married with Children?). We'll also overlook Raj's attempt to treat his social anxiety using experimental medication that causes him to take his clothes off. That concept threatened to break loose from the lab and become a subplot, but for now it seems to have been killed off. We remain, as always, cautiously optimistic.

Oh, and by the way, AUTOTROPHS DON'T DROOL!!1!! We probably should have mentioned this before.

Sheesh. Musicians.

The Big Bang Theory Season 5 (and beyond)

The Winner of our Discontent

To keep tabs on the hurried youth of today, LabKitty lurks on a certain pop-culture website which shall remain nameless (The name rhymes with a small, slender Californian fish that swarms onto beaches at night to spawn. The eggs are buried in the sand, and the young fish are swept out to sea on the following spring tide.) One thing we have discovered is the hurried youth of today hate TBBT. That in itself is not surprising; they hate everything (well, everything except Arrested Development, Breaking Bad, Community, Firefly, and The Wire. Stephen King also gets a lifetime pass, even though it's been literally several hours since he published a new novel). In their hipster universe, Shakespeare was a hack, Eddie Van Halen can't play guitar, and [ random gorgeous actress ] isn't really that attractive.

Oh to be 22 and understand everything about the world again.

But the occasionally cogent of their brood voice a complaint about TBBT that we cannot refute (no doubt as they comb Hot Pocket crumbs out of their neckbeards): TBBT morphed from being a comedy about smart people into being a sitcom about nerds. It is true: ordinary sitcom tropes are consuming much of the action here in S5. Wedding preparations. Sex jokes. Long distance relationships. Sex jokes. Overbearing Jewish mothers. Comic book stores. Sex jokes. Even more troubling is that Sheldon has transformed from the bizarre albeit world-class intellect of previous seasons into more of an annoying man-child. Such scripts do not require physicists to animate. Erkel will do.

Tellingly, our list of science complaints in S5 is rather curt compared to previous seasons. Our post-Netflix-marathon crib notes contained only the following:

  1. The Wiggly Finger Catalyst (S5/E4): It's not "Higgs boson particle." Stop saying "Higgs boson particle." It's either "Higgs boson" or "Higgs particle."
  2. The Vacation Solution (S5/E16): Einstein did not "fail math." Ever. (It's disconcerting how persistent this myth remains. While it's true many teachers had a poor opinion of Albert in his youth, they didn't dislike him because he was a poor student, they disliked him because he was a smart-ass.) Also, Sheldon introduced his example locus ceruleus fat joke using id est when he should have used exempli gratia. Also, Sheldon won't find the locus ceruleus in the cerebral hemispheres Amy is working on regardless of how big it is because the locus ceruleus is in the brainstem.
  3. The Rothman Disintegration (S5/E17): Sheldon and Kripke would not have cause to fight over Professor Rothman's office after he was forced to retire because faculty cannot be forced to retire. See our discussion of tenure in The Jiminy Conjecture above (sheesh, it's almost like Chuck Lorre doesn't read LabKitty). Also, our guys would never in a million years defer to the university president to resolve their dispute. Clearly, the TBBT writers have forgotten the Academic's Creed.

From this one might conclude we are SHAKING WITH RAGE as they used to say in Yahoo comments (and perhaps still do. HOW ARE BABBIES MADE? Heh, heh). Meh, not so much. Season 5 made us make this face :D often enough and that's really all we ask (fer Cat's sake, hipsters, it's just a TV show. If you're looking for a deconstruction of existentialist ennui, go read Sartre).

Mostly, S5 carries on the trajectory of S4. Amy Farrah Fowler is still the high-point, with her creepy BFF crush on Penny made glorious by Mayim Bialik's superb comedic timing (the giant painting in E17 is our favorite joke of the show). Apparently some people are getting skeeved-out by the Amy-slash-Penny vibe (and we do mean slash) but we refuse to view Amy's adulation as anything but non-sexual -- the wallflower finally getting to hang out with the prom queen and going predictably nutzo as a result. As grandaddy used to say, skeevy is in the mind of the beholder. Right before they hung him (a story for another time).

The show also went all the way to the guest-star power rail in S5, scoring appearances from Brent Spiner, (the voice of) Leonard Nimoy, real astronaut Mike Massimino, and of course the ne plus ultra of nerds: Stephen Hawking (or as Penny put it: the wheelchair dude who invented time). About they only way the show could top this roster next season is if LabKitty makes an appearance. (Fair warning: we don't work cheap. And our creative demands include M&Ms ad libitum and sorted by color.)

On the downside, the writers are finding less and less for Raj to do, and Wolowitz's pervasive lechery continues to be grating. Additionally, his NASA subplot seemed to us a bit hollow. There is indeed a breed of nerd that would be up for spaceflight (heck, one of the original requirements for astronauts was an engineering degree), but Howard Wolowitz ain't it.

Finally, alas, the studio audience has grown even more obnoxious in S5. A lively crowd is nice and all, but one suspects Jim Parsons or Kaley Cuoco could stand on stage and read the phone book and these people would go "woo." If we wanted to suffer through drooling fanboys drowning out the show, we'd watch The Colbert Report.

Dear studio audiences,






The Big Bang Theory copyright CBS Broadcasting, Inc. Inclusion here is claimed as fair use under US copyright law, as these images appear as part of a discussion of the work in question.


LearnTelekinesis on April 22, 2014:

not usually a fan of american tv shows like friends but big bang. Awesome!!! great post

Pat Goltz on February 18, 2014:

Are you sure about that? You were right. Reader signed guestbook (love your description!) Very detailed and informative.

anonymous on January 28, 2014:

I really like the show when I have time to watch it .

Heidi Vincent from GRENADA on January 27, 2014:

Hmmmm. A lot happened to get me to sign this guestbook. I was amused while finding out the difference between reel life and real life as a Physicist/Nerd, LabKitty!

Renee Dixon from Kentucky on January 27, 2014:

I did get a good laugh and enjoyed your perspective but I have to confess that I love this show :)

Chazz from New York on January 27, 2014:

This is amazing! Kudos on a smart, sassy, and fun analysis.

anonymous on January 27, 2014:

Terrific writing, a lot of fun. Congratulations on getting LotD!

anonymous on January 27, 2014:

This made me LOL. I have yet to watch a single episode of tBBT. I think I watched about 5 minutes (oh what I wouldn't give to have that 5 minutes back) at one point and eek. Now as to physicists playing WoW, our guild has one, a real live working physicist who says I can't tell where he works. Nerds and geeks are cuddly and amusing all by themselves; they don't need cheesy dialogue and faux-romance killing skills to entrance me.

luggnutz13 lm on January 27, 2014:

Very Nice. Very funny!

Denise McGill from Fresno CA on January 27, 2014:

Thank you so much for the laughs. This was really creative and cleaver. I enjoyed it almost as much as TBBT seasons 1-7.

Stephen J Parkin from Pine Grove, Nova Scotia, Canada on January 27, 2014:

Real Physicists do not waste time writing or reading about TBBT or do they? I certainly did and I studied Physics at the same school as Dr Stephen Hawkings! Rumour has it he watches and has appeared on the show, shame about your theories! Great Lens and a real hoot though!

RecRog on January 27, 2014:

I am a real life physics major, retired and living in Los Angeles in a modest house a mile from the infamous Venice Beach. I worked building satellites for Hughes Aircraft, Rest Their Corporate Soul, in the day when people were paid a fair wage. Unlike today when the work is sent offshore to China. I would have lost all of my security clearances for even visiting anywhere in China.

I lasted nearly 15 minutes in the first show before deciding it was inane. I usually give a new show at least an entire episode before passing judgment.

Kim Milai on January 27, 2014:

Great lens, enjoyable writing!

PaigSr from State of Confusion on January 27, 2014:

Have not really gotten into this show. However the one thing that does interest me are the different shirts of Sheldon. Its just interesting to see what they will sometimes be. With that bit of confusion... Nicely done as LotD.

Carol Houle from Montreal on January 27, 2014:

Great rant, excellent writing and funny. '~can't swing a dead cat without hitting an unemployed postdoc'. Unfortunate, but true and it needs to be reminded that new professors and scientists must also roll up their sleeves and be brave.

SteveKaye on January 27, 2014:

This sitcom is part of an effort to discredit scientists. I'll add that I have a Ph.D. in chemical engineering and have spent decades working with hard core technical people. All of them were very, very human. They had decent marriages, raised children, and led normal lives.

If you check my articles on Squidoo, you'll find that I've written a novel, published poetry, and (now) take photos of birds. As for string theory, I use it to tie my shoes.

Andy-Po on January 27, 2014:

Bazinga! Very funny. I am a Physicist, but I still enjoy Big Bang Theory. I'm nothing like any of the characters in the show (well maybe a bit like Sheldon) Better get back to my game of Second Life (whatever that is)

Merry Citarella from Oregon's Southern Coast on January 27, 2014:

What a great lens! Love your humor! Enjoyed reading it all (even the parts I didn't understand-ha!) Congrats on LotD. Very well deserved. PS. and I've never seen the show.

commerceMaster on January 27, 2014:

Great lens! and love the show

RoadMonkey on January 27, 2014:

Really funny and some really TRUE observations on academic life. They definitely need LabKitty!

paul524 on January 27, 2014:

Great lens. Thanks for writing.

tonyleather on January 27, 2014:

Excellent lens, though I have to say I never did find the programme funny, and now never bother watching it!

Neeru-Rajju on January 27, 2014:

I love this lens. Given that it references my favorite TV show, and then tears it apart makes it a fun read. More lenses please :)

evawrites1 on January 27, 2014:

Great lens :) I just have one question then... real physicists do not spend their time making Squidoo lenses... so who wrote this lens then... :))

danielmccarthy lm on January 27, 2014:

Wow, so in depth. TBBT stands up against the all time great sitcoms. I especially enjoyed Season 1, 2 and the latest season.

Renaissance Woman from Colorado on January 27, 2014:

I'll be waiting with bated breath for that radioactive spider episode. Seriously. Wondering why you languished in academia when you could have been writing episodes all along. Perhaps, like me, you needed the fodder. Universities are fodder factories above all else. Congrats on Lens of the Day! Better than a Nobel?

shovonpk on January 27, 2014:


shovonpk on January 27, 2014:


sousababy on January 22, 2014:

Came by to check this gem out again . . .

hkhollands on June 24, 2013:

Love it. Great writing, and I relate to the topic. Thanks for the laughs, too, especially, "Real physicists do not spend evenings playing WoW, Second Life, or Halo, or making Squidoo lenses detailing the inaccuracies of fictional physicists from TV shows. Sheesh." ha ha ha.

PinkstonePictures from Miami Beach, FL on April 21, 2013:

Eating in the lab - shame on you ;-) Great lens, funny and a lot of work has gone into this. Thanks for putting this together

Amy Trumpeter from Oxford on March 11, 2013:

Bazinga! Blessed this fab lens for you :-)

kigali-crafts on March 11, 2013:

This is great - really well written, Congrats! We love TBBT!

LabKittyDesign (author) on December 23, 2012:

@anonymous: Um, well. How about that.

anonymous on December 21, 2012:

Jeniffer from UK i wanna thank Dr okogbo for what he has done for me at first i taught he was scam but until i just decided to follow my mind.i told him that my ex lover which i loved with all my heart left me for another all Dr okogbo did was to laugh and said he will be back to me in 3days time i taught he was lying on the 3rd day my ex called me and said he wanna see me,i was shocked then he came over to my place and started begging that he was bewitched,immediately i forgives him and now we are back and he his really madly in love with me.All thanks to Dr okogbo he indeed wonderful incise you wanna contact him here his is private mail

Max Globe on December 12, 2012:

Grrreat lens! Well done :)

C A Chancellor from US/TN on December 10, 2012:

LOL! This was a hoot. Thanks for the comprehensive critique of TBBT. :-)

LabKittyDesign (author) on November 20, 2012:

@eightieschild: Gaah! Hoisted by our own Picard! We shall fix. Thanks!

eightieschild on November 20, 2012:

FANTASTICALLY well-written, entertaining and insightful article. :)

I still love TBBT despite all of the issues you mention here, and will even forgive your misspelling of Wolowitz as "Walowicz".

PeterStip on November 13, 2012:

is the name of the show not simply being chosen to make fun of The big bang theory. A theory that's still not excepted as the truth by many religious people. Especially the die hard creationists. The sit come therefore simply is a subtle attack against science.

Great lens.

LabKittyDesign (author) on November 10, 2012:

@karen-stephens: We're the wind, baby...

karen-stephens on November 09, 2012:

Funny! Not sure I know labkitty though.

LabKittyDesign (author) on November 06, 2012:

@anonymous: Hopefully our little review here doesn't come off as grumpy - we're really just havin' a little fun...

anonymous on November 06, 2012:

One way I've managed to enjoy almost every movie or show I've watched is to not try to question the how realistic they are and while I think the nerds are beyond normal, I still enjoy the series, gives me a good laugh. I know I ain't like that. My opinion.

Hal Gall from Bloomington, IN on October 29, 2012:

"Real physicists don't eat in the cafeteria"...I like that! I also like TBBT, even though it is a bit hokey at times.

Katie Hazel on October 19, 2012:

ah I don't know why I watch this show: i have watched almost ever episode but I don't think I like it very much. it's true they really force the stereotypes and a lot of people take it seriously.

anonymous on September 17, 2012:

This doesn't have to do with physicists, but they have a pretty big mistake on Season 4, episode 23 (The Engagement Reaction).

They're in a hospital and like a germophobe that Sheldon is, when a man coughs next to him he immediately enters the room next to him, which is a biohazard room.

But really? A bio hazard room that not only isn't locked, it doesn't even have a handle! He just pushed the door and entered. I don't think they have such poor safety in hospitals...

esichrissa on September 13, 2012:

reader signs guestbooks hahahah

AishwaryaTiwari1 on August 26, 2012:

Loved reading this lens, like your style of presentation.

LabKittyDesign (author) on July 26, 2012:

@anonymous: Too late! :-P

anonymous on July 23, 2012:

All that repressed anger man! Good thing you have the blog to vent over.Otherwise you might get an ulcer.

gradientcat on June 22, 2012:

Fun facts, enjoyed your lens.

Andrew Scott from New Zealand on April 06, 2012:

I like TBBT. I like LabKitty

LabKittyDesign (author) on April 06, 2012:

@anonymous: YIKES.

anonymous on April 05, 2012:

For those who might question the portrayal of Amy Farrah Fowler by Mayim Bialik, please google "Amy Bishop". Guess what her field of expertise is.

anonymous on April 03, 2012:

This was excellent. I was writing an article and you guys definitely helped set me in the right direction. Much appreciated. Perhaps you could do a follow up with some of the ways they are accurate?

sallemange on March 19, 2012:

This is really good. Love the writing style - hilarious.

dwnovacek on February 28, 2012:

Great lens about one of my favorite shows every! Angel Blessed!

efriedman on February 23, 2012:

Only recently discovered the show, partly because of a lack of any TV. So we are seasons behind and still laughing. Even as a lowly biochemist/molecular biologist (and not a lofty physicist) I get a kick out of it and MORE IMPORTANTLY out of your excellent commentary on this lens!! Kudos LabKitty!!

tricomanagement on January 30, 2012:

what fun - Leonard = Spock!!! I liked the rock eating crawly thing . . . LOL

loved the lens

anonymous on January 25, 2012:

is it true the guys in TBBT first names = first names of well known USA physicists?

Leonard = Susskind

Sheldon = Glashow

Howard = Georgie

and Raj?.... hmmm a high energy nuclear physicist from india?

pawpaw911 on July 27, 2011:

Fun show. Nice lens.

ChrisDay LM on May 27, 2011:

Loved the lens - very refreshing.

LabKittyDesign (author) on February 24, 2011:

@Positivevibestechnician: Er, not sure our data supports that hypothesis...

Positivevibestechnician on February 23, 2011:

This was a great lens very entertaining and informative, nerds get all the chicks.

BlueStarling on February 17, 2011:

Very funny. I do know a real life physicist and, well, he is kind of nerdy, but women fall all over him anyway.

Susan Deppner from Arkansas USA on February 13, 2011:

I've never known a real-life physicist, so I appreciate the information. I'm also concerned about the jumping of the shark. (Fun lens!)

Treasures By Brenda from Canada on January 11, 2011:

I have three Big Bang Theory fans and one aspiring physicist under my roof...they hoot at BBT! I'm pleased to say that they don't resemble those guys in many ways.

MargoPArrowsmith on November 27, 2010:

Very funny and probably true. However, I remember when Los Angeles was a cheap place to live!

Mary Norton from Ontario, Canada on November 01, 2010:

Really fun and enjoyable. Witty.

redpillpuppet on November 01, 2010:

Fun lens! Thanks for the lensroll. Lensrolled you back.

Related Articles