Skip to main content

Should I Watch..? 'The Living Daylights' (1987)

Benjamin considers himself an authority on James Bond, having reviewed every film and many more over a number of years.

Promotional poster for "The Living Daylights."

Promotional poster for "The Living Daylights."

What's the Big Deal?

The Living Daylights is an action spy thriller film released in 1987 and is the fifteenth film in the James Bond series. It marked Timothy Dalton's debut as 007, replacing Roger Moore after twelve years in the role and sees Bond pursue a recaptured defector and battle with the new head of the KGB. The title comes from a short story by Ian Fleming and this would be the last film using a Fleming title until the Daniel Craig-helmed reboot Casino Royale in 2006. The film was well received by critics and audiences alike, becoming a commercial success with box office takings in excess of $190 million and Dalton's portrayal of Bond helped bring the character back to his roots after the increasingly light-hearted interpretation of the role by Moore.


What's It About?

British secret agent James Bond is assigned to assist the defection of Soviet General Koskov during an orchestra's performance in Bratislava, Czechoslovakia. During the intermission, Bond notices that the orchestra's cellist, Kara Milovy, is the sniper preventing Koskov's escape but Bond shoots her gun out of her hands (disobeying orders to kill her) and escapes with Koskov. Back in London, Koskov warns MI6 that the new head of the KGB (General Pushkin) is assassinating suspected Western spies but before he can elaborate, Koskov is snatched from MI6's safe house. MI6, therefore, assigns Bond to locate and eliminate Pushkin before tensions rise between the Soviet Union and the West.

Bond quickly discovers that Koskov's initial defection was staged and that Milovy is actually Koskov's lover. Tracking her down in Bratislava, Bond escapes with Milovy from the KGB and must quickly locate Koskov who is working with American arms dealer Brad Whittaker in order to sell a massive amount of opium purchased in Afghanistan from the Mujahideen.


What's to like?

Bond is back! The goofy rogue that Moore played in seven films has gone and the dangerous man of action we remember from From Russia With Love makes his long-awaited return. Dalton's Bond might lack the humor that endeared 007 to us but he's certainly ready to get his hands dirty when it matters. The action, which had come on in leaps and bounds since the 1970s, once again lifts the film out of its spy-based clichés. Highlights include the opening sequence and a stunning fistfight between two characters clinging to a cargo net hanging out of the back of a plane in mid-flight. For my money, this latter stunt is one of the best ever seen in the Bond series.

But frankly, it's a relief to finally see the Bond character get back to his roots. No floating in space with laser guns, no gondolas transforming into a hovercraft, no girls with stupid innuendo-based names. This feels like a proper Bond film, full of Cold-War imagery and even the Aston Martin makes a return. OK, it's only an ugly V8 Vantage compared to the beautiful DB5 but you can't have everything.

Having the Mujahideen ride to the rescue feels very out-dated these days...

Having the Mujahideen ride to the rescue feels very out-dated these days...

Fun Facts

  • Partly due to criticism of Roger Moore's poor stunt doubles, Dalton did most of the stunts himself including the opening sequence where he clings to the roof of a Land Rover speeding down a hill in Gibraltar.
  • The rocket fired from the ghetto blaster in Q's lab was an effect activated by none other than Prince Charles who was visiting the set that day with Diana, Princess Of Wales.
  • The film's poster caused some controversy because it appeared to evoke violence against women. The model, Kathy Stangel, was only paid $600 to appear on the poster.

What's not to like?

The story is pretty weak: you can tell that they ran out of ideas once Fleming's short story finished. There is little cohesion to the film which makes an already complex plot almost impossible to follow. Take the character of Whittaker as an example: did the film really need him? What did he bring to the movie besides an additional shoot-out after the main battle in Afghanistan? I honestly cannot remember.

He's not helped by the supporting cast. Krabbé isn't too bad but d'Abo's gooey-eyed routine as the film's sole Bond girl gets annoying very quickly and is a far cry from the more proactive female characters we see in Bond films these days. Wisniewski's Necros is also a poor henchman with little to distinguish him from any of the other anonymous grunts. Aside from the stunt work, there's little to get that excited about here. It doesn't feel memorable or as engaging as it should, probably due to the fact that most audiences won't have a clue as to what's going on. I suspect that nobody really knew what to expect from Dalton, who barely cracks a smile in the entire picture and is utterly devoid of Bond's signature charm and wit. If anything, he feels a bit like Rambo in a tuxedo which is something that would come to the fore in his second and final outing as 007, Licence To Kill.

Bond's V8 Aston Martin comes equipped with skis this time, naturally...

Bond's V8 Aston Martin comes equipped with skis this time, naturally...

Scroll to Continue

Should I Watch It?

It was a good effort but The Living Daylights remains a solid watch instead of a spectacular one. Dalton's Bond has the brawn but not the charm that 007 also possesses and its confusing story will serve only to make most viewers lose interest. My advice? Watch it for the stunt and action sequences which are some of the best the series has ever produced.

Great For: action fans, 80's themed parties, fans of the Bond books

Not So Great For: people who can't concentrate for long, Roger Moore fans

What else should I watch?

Dalton's second film as 007 (Licence To Kill) is a much more straightforward affair that dispenses with complicated Cold-War plots and settles for being a basic action flick. It's a much darker film than most Bond efforts but sadly, one where Dalton still couldn't find his inner personality and further reduces the role to that of an indestructible superman.

It's harsh of me to dismiss Roger Moore's time as Bond because he did do well in The Spy Who Loved Me which is an underrated and very enjoyable film. Personally, I associate Moore more with nonsense like Moonraker and A View to a Kill which are weak Bond films indeed, not helped by Moore's increasingly apparent old age. For me, I prefer the ultra-modern Skyfall or the granddaddy of them all, Sean Connery's iconic Goldfinger.

Main Cast


Timothy Dalton

James Bond

Maryam d'Abo

Kara Milovy

Jeroen Krabbé

General Georgi Koskov

Joe Don Baker

Brad Whittaker

John Rhys-Davies

General Leonid Pushkin

Art Malik

Kamran Shah

Andreas Wisniewski


Technical Info

*based on the short story by Ian Fleming

DirectorJohn Glen


Richard Maibaum & Michael G. Wilson *

Running Time

130 minutes

Release Date (UK)

30th June, 1987




Action, Spy, Thriller

© 2015 Benjamin Cox

Soap Box

Benjamin Cox (author) from Norfolk, UK on July 04, 2015:

Agree totally. Dalton wasn't given long enough to make his mark on the series but remember that the franchise had numerous legal issues at the time as well to contend with, not to mention a number of other people departing the series. Dalton's short tenure wasn't entirely his fault - he was just the right guy at the wrong time.

Keith Abt from The Garden State on July 04, 2015:

Dalton had the potential to be a decent Bond but he wasn't given enough time (or strong enough material) to truly inhabit the role.

Living Daylights has its moments, but they obviously weren't sure which direction they wanted to go in - comedic and fluffy ala Moore or grim and gritty ala Connery - and trying to please both camps of Bond fans makes the whole movie feel unbalanced.

Related Articles