Passionate, Committed, Diligent, Creative, Eager, Aspirational, Articulate.
The quandary over the competitive insurgent champion of battling conquest between Marvel’s Avengers team and DC’s Justice League is a catalyst opening the window for exchanges of impassioned arguments that has aged back as far as the formulation of the super-groups themselves. What cannot be refuted about the very pressing matter is the sustained longevity of the endurance of the alluring appeal of participating within the suffusing arguments distributed around the many varied aspects of the debate, as has been reflected in the defiance of any capitulation of fatigue with the very concept of the discussion. Articulating a biased or even unbiased opinion is an outlet for the expression of even the most primitive and undeveloped notion of personal verdict, and no matter what issue it is pertinent to, it is an intrinsic temptation of humanity to insist on the polarised influence on the pendulum swing of an alternating scale of the prevalent consensus on absolutely anything. It just so transpires that arguing the sake of superiority with the luminary icons of comic books is one of the most popular and intense niches to become involved in; As testified by the overwhelming reputation of fierce eloquence that so called comic books “geeks” purport.
While the designation under the moniker of “geek” used to be a phrase of derision angled at victims of social ostracisation, the cult following of the typical generalised tropes of what a “geek” would traditionally be interested in has become a zeitgeist that even a casual proponent no take pride in seeking at the very least. Disparagement of anything should be a concern of years gone by, and of a forgotten age, and while that is unfortunately not yet the case, strides are being made in the favourable direction for more unity and civility in the healthy disagreements over conflicting opinions. The toxicity that certain sphere of societies varying demographics emit into the atmosphere is abhorrent, and a philosophy of more sophisticated discussion on the more “trivial” topics, such as that of comic books and their derived progenies, may hopefully lead to civilised negotiation within the more consequential climate of politics, eventually. That is what comic books, movies & television, music, visual & literary art and various other mediums for entertaining consumption and amusement provide the escapist outlet for-In comic books, the superheroes contained within their titular genre have come on to adopt the identity of reverence that a modern semblance of a religious or mythological god would previously assume. They are aspirational figures, and while the ability to cultivate their specific powers is physiologically impossible, the ideals and metaphorical experiences they represent isn’t an unrealistic ambition for individual accomplishment.
This contemplative dilemma is not restricted to comic books or movies; As it is analogously comparable in the alternative guises it assumes in music, with the stubborn debates over whether Megadeth or Metallica are the reigning masters of metal, or what entire genre is the greatest in the medium, in football, with the perennial debate over whether Lionel Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo is superior, American football, with the discussions contrasting Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady, and in video games, where Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog are engaged in an eternal conquest for exalted supremacy, for instance. When traction on these topical dilemmas is amassed, it tends to exponentially increase and snowball and become overwhelming. But that is the beauty of debate-There is no one truly definitive answer of correctness and virtue, when the definition of the verified validity of a proclamation is predicated entirely upon subjective opinion.
An unbiased, but indecisively inconclusive answer to the posited question is the determination that there is no equitable way to ascertain which super-team would emerge dominant in the wake of zealous acrimony. What would be guaranteed would be the inadvertent expulsion of the destructive besiegement that collateral damage would spell the disaster of. Recipes for destruction would be created and havoc would be wreaked as the wars would be waged and crafts would be necessitated to be refined in order to overcome the opposing degrees of adversity. But pessimistic digressions aside, within the realm of the pages of comic books, no greater testament to the sheer potency of the Justice League's almost uncontested reign has yet been documented or illustrated. However, their closest rivals certainly are the Avengers, and any number of competitive matchups between any of the respective alums would be a fascinating prospect.
Vision vs Martian Man Hunter and Batman vs Iron Man are the conventional expectations, as their similarities would dictate the most "fair" fight theoretically. But what yields the most magnificently mesmeric potential to engross would be discordant mismatches, such as Hulk vs Aquaman or Wonder Woman vs Ant-Man. It would be all too orthodox to compare and contrast the tenacity of Wonder Woman's abilities against that of Captain America's or Thor's, or the feat of Superman's strength against Hulk or Thor's. What convention would also dictate is that, given the near omnipotence of the last son of Krypton as he was portrayed in the literary media, he would be the true undisputed champion of any conflict with other members of the DC or Marvel universes. But it would be remiss to neglect to mention his unresolved vulnerability to magic-Of which, Scarlett Witch possesses in spades. Also, the financial capabilities of Tony Stark would enable him to acquire some residual pieces of Kryptonite and incorporate it into the arsenal of weaponry that the Iron Man suit is capable of, much like Lex Luthor's malevolent machinations.
Cinematically, the integrity of the narrative progressions the alums of the individual superhero conglomerates is reflective of the stability that their accommodating intellectual identities have been able to manufacture and assemble for themselves; With the tumultuous fluctuations of the critical appraisal of DC's expanded universe, and the Marvel cinematic universe proudly flaunting disseminated properties of enticement on a regular basis, with rare intermittent releases of unfavourable calibre. Canonically, the compelling gravitas of DC's developmental progressive arcs pales in comparison to that of Marvel's, and so a nonchalant answer would claim that the latter would have a relatively tranquil and undisturbed experience in establishing their rightful entitlement as the elite class of epitomising heroes, enshrined atop the pinnacle echelons of fictional fantasies. But there will be raving advocates and cynical detractors, arguing points of avid justification as proponents for the beneficiary elements, and excruciating exasperation over the dysfunctional inefficiencies that failed to strike a harmonious chard resonating within the souls of audiences.
What puts any cinematic interpretive iteration of the comic book source material under the disadvantageous and beleaguering duress of the stress and strain of merely attempting to execute effectively is the unfavourable and thankless task that refreshing the purveyance of the content, and potentially attempting to improve it, while simultaneously maintaining a fidelity to the original composition-So as not to infuriate the clamouring fans of the preceding product. It is nearly impossible to find a desirable equilibrium, and the rampant success of Marvel's purported products is an aberration. Even the monolithic behemoth of Marvel is susceptible to fallacies, and they are not infallible. They have had to persevere through arduous and toilsome tribulations more regularly than they have permitted the impression of to be exhibited, and it is only due to the sagacity of their public address that they have managed to retain an iconic reputation for being the staunchly stable proprietors of respectably admirable properties that they have.
DC, on the other hand, have not been so successful. They are even perceived to be in an ostensibly greater state of disarray than they actually are, because they have allowed even minor discrepancies to reach the perspective grip of the public, who have then proceeded to blow it out of proportion. Almost every decision on the part of Warner Bros. seems to be made as a knee-jerk impulsive reaction to either fan reception, or what they anxiously anticipate it will be. They require more composure, as has been made evident by the sundry of drastic alterations they have made during the production process of the majority of their films. Of course, adversity and unfavourable odds will inevitably rear their ugly heads in any pressurised situation, let alone ones of the monumental recognition and anticipation of a superhero film. But they have failed to persevere at times that perhaps just required a modest degree of further inspiration, and have also stubbornly persisted with some exacted course of course that otherwise would have been ill-advised. Despite the scathing aspersions cast at Suicide Squad, DC have not committed a total atrocity or a heinous transgression against the honourable prestige of cinema. There are redeeming qualities in each and every feature film they have submitted to the world, and in the opinion of even some of DC’s critics, they have primarily been the heroes.
While initially controversial due to the morose overtones that pervaded his gravitas, and then for the drastic transition of his personal qualities, there has been something about the generated aura of Superman that has sustained his endearment to fans, and has made the departure of Henry Cavill from the role a sorrowful waste(that again, serves to depose Warner Bros’ favour). The election to make the cinematic interpretation of Batman a more rugged and older incarnation, that is all but desensitised to the merciful considerations of an opponent’s vulnerabilities and resemblant of the version depicted in the “The Dark Knight Returns” graphic novel was one that was the recipient of an overwhelming degree of praise. Wonder Woman is perhaps the most consistent, and is assertable as the most inspirational and empowering hero, full of optimism, but simultaneously cognisant of the tragic severity of the events befalling her. Aquaman and Cyborg are interesting prospects that are compelling by way of their courage and mature preservation of moral integrity and ethical righteousness, and although they run the risk of becoming bland archetypes of the “surfer dude”(as an intuitive antithesis to the ridiculed personality he previously occupied but a decade ago in the comics) and an emotionless, stoic cybernetic being, further in depth exploration of the defining assets of their character will hopefully provide vital perspicacity, divulging essential indulgence in the fabric of their being. That would likewise be the case for the Flash, who arguably shone the most for the duration of screen time her was allocated in the Justice League film.
Marvel have privileged themselves to the luxury of a more structure formula of development, and have reaped the rewards of constructing pillars of foundations in the preliminary outputs of Ironman and Thor, followed by Captain America and the Avengers Assemble films. Their development was not without fault-with the characters of the Hulk requiring a recast and a semi retcon of the strides made by his eponymous title, Hawkeye garnering at least an initial reputation for being the “whipping boy” of the franchise with his superficially negligible abilities, and Black Widow being neglected a far as what her tactical prowess and ingenious warranted the deployment of-but were certainly proficient enough in the portrayal of the heroes to earn them the investing bargain from Disney. The pandemic appraisal that the franchise has been the worthy recipient of ever since those formative years has culminated in the resplendent reviews that Avengers: Infinity War has been the beneficiary of-And there is still an exorbitant amount of progress to be made along the course of exponential evolution on the horizon. But the same can be said of DC’s cinema, as while they are not at the bottom of the proverbial food chain, the perception that they are at the peril of plummeting into the despairing mire of that state does elicit the optimistic stance that occupying the bottom can only allow the opportunity to ascend. That is a potential avenue for progression that a realist could postulate-Not just an optimist.
The commensurate development of the two competing establishments of promoted phenomena is what fuels the desire of one another. It could only be speculated about whether one would have reached the heights of astonishing achievement that they have accomplished in the absence of their competitor. But that is a notion that is preposterous and repellent for any fan of comic books and film. They balance each other out, vying for superiority, but with a degree of mutual respect that borders affection. They both convene and concur on the amicable mentality that they stand firm together in the endeavour of preserving the pristine culture of comic book fandom, and the denoted extensions within the multiple media formats that have spawned from the precedents set by the inaugural format for the exposure of the fictional parables intricately woven by the visionary artists responsible for the creation of the many captivating characters igniting the conveyance of the stories they star within.
As outlined by the overview of the progression of the two publishing entities, this extends beyond that of just the Justice League and the Avengers; There are several other groups that have blazed their illustrious and iconic trails all over the landscape of the conceptual environment-The Guardians of the Galaxy, the West Coast Avengers, the X-Men, the Justice League Dark, the Teen Titans, the Doom Patrol, and Batman’s rogues gallery alone are all opulent examples of finely tuned and tremendous groups of characters that seem to be tailor-made for euphoric assimilative absorption from their fans. And that is while neglecting to mention the renegade alums of the universes. There may be discrepancies and compelling cases verging on either side of the argumentative preference, but to sit on the fence and encourage the absolute advocacy of each and every argument; The desire is that they will endure for an astronomically stellar staple of the endurance of time. Because they have thus far, and no volume of arguments against them and debating, financial or political detriments have been able to deter their meteoric ascension to the amazing achievements they have made thus far.