Although the practice is slowly going out of style in many court districts; for many years U.S. courtrooms have been sketched in often hilarious portrayal. But why do courtrooms use sketch artists in the first place? What can they do that cameras and camcorders can't.
For the remainder of this hub I will enlighten you as to the main reasons why courtroom sketches are in use today. The answers may surprise you. Afterwards I will post courtroom sketches from famous (or rather infamous) trials that have played out within the last two decades or so....Enjoy.
A Brief History of Courtroom Sketching
Courtroom Sketching in the United States can be dated back all the way back to the Salem Witch Trials (1692-1693). As camera and video technology were not in existence at that time, sketches were the only reliable visual records of well.....anything. Thus courtroom sketches were in wide use right up until the late 19th century. Certain courtroom sketch artists became well-known for both their skill, speed and accurate depictions of courtroom scenery and drama. For example, George Caleb Bingham and David G. Blyth are two well-known courtroom sketch artists from this period. Their works were constant features in the pages of the New York Times and other well-known publications of the time.
Before we go on any further, I think it is important to realize one important thing. Courtroom sketch artists are not court-mandated or affiliated with any part of the legal system itself. In fact, if you haven't guessed it already, the only parties/persons who use courtroom sketch artists are the media and publications companies (think CNN and The New York Times). But then Justin....why don't they simply use video cameras or photography in the courtroom. There's a historical reason and I was getting to that. Now before I was so rudely interrupted.
During the early 50's mass publication of news photography had reached an all time high. This encouraged newsgroups to use flash photography to cover every major news event....and yes this included major court cases. Unsurprisingly, many court districts viewed photographers as a major distraction inside the courtroom and banned them altogether.
Not to be deterred by simple laws, newsgroups quickly sought out the assistance of sketch artists once again (who were still banned in some districts...but not as many as photographers were).
It wasn't until the mid-1980s that the first cameras and certain camcorders were allowed to be used in a courtroom without restriction. However, cameras and camcorders are still prohibited in some court districts. Therefore, sketch artists are still in use where cameras and camcorders are strictly prohibited.
Now for your viewing pleasure, below I have laid out a series of courtroom sketches.from famous (if not infamous) court cases.
United States District Court: District of Massachusetts.
United States of America v. Richard Colvin Reid, aka Abdul-Raheem aka Abu Ibrahim.
English Court System
Julian Assange Bond Hearing
Los Angeles Superior Court
Robyn Fenty vs. Chris Maurice Brown
Clark County Regional Justice Center (in Las Vegas)
Centre County Court
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Gerald Arthur Sandusky
Denver U.S. District Cout
Taylor Swift v. David Mueller
Also a little known fact about courtroom sketches from infamous trails is that they have surprising value as collectors items. Typical asking prices can range from as little as $7.00 to as much as $4,000.00 online. And at in-person auctions, prices for these sketches can approach $10,000.00 and above. As an example, check out the ebay post below for the courtroom sketch of the Timothy McVeigh Trial (Oklahoma City Bomber) and others.
Similar Hubs (Legal)
- How Accurate are Police Sketch Artists?
Police sketches / composite profiles have always been a hallmark of good police investigation and sleuthing. And yet the composite drawings themselves have always been a subject of skepticism and doubt. And the doubters have some good points....
- How is Alimony Calculated in the United States?
Alimony (also called spousal support or maintenance depending on where you live), is a court-ordered transfer or money from one spouse to another spouse who is in need of financial assistance, following a divorce or lengthy separation. In the United.
- Why Do Courts Need Stenographers?
Another hub explaining one of the peculiarities of the modern day courtroom. This time its all about stenographers.
- Can your Facebook profile be used against you in a court of law?
Ah Facebook, Zuckerburg's pet project that serves to unite 1/10 th of the entire planet virtually through simple (though effective) digital posts. And posting on Facebook is safe enough right? Some people have even described it as therapeutic. So...
- The Reasons Why Lawyers Get Disbarred
This hub explores how, when and under what circumstances attorneys (lawyers) are disbarred. To answer this, we will explore what it means to be a disbarred attorney in the U.S.
- Creating a Pet Care Trust.
Similar but slightly unrelated hub about creating a per care trust.
PoetikalyAnointed on May 10, 2019:
I enjoyed reading this Hub because it's different and and rare. I don't see many Hubs on such topics and it is fascinating. Nice touch adding the real and infamous sketches featured here.
It's always fun to learn a few tidbits of info here and there as you read the Hubs here or just in general.
Justin Muirhead (author) from New York on July 07, 2015:
No problem, thanks for reading :)
MM Del Rosario from NSW, Australia on July 06, 2015:
very informative, thanks for sharing