The history of a racist tinge being fought against or allowed into a political party is a long, hard struggle. I continue to be appalled at the stories black friends tell me they have heard from grandparents and great grandparents. It still is not over, even today. Looking back to 1789, after the U.S. Constitution was ratified, Congress made further extensive efforts to end slavery.
They did this by passing the laws of the Northwest Ordinance. This law outlawed any slavery in federal territories held at that time. It is for this reason that these seven eventually entered the nation as slave-free states:
A couple decades later, Congress continued its fight against slavery by ending slave trade in 1808. A sermon celebrating this was given by the Rev. Absalom Jones. He was the first black bishop in the Episcopal Church in America. This sermon he gave in St. Thomas’ Church, Philadelphia became famous.
The Northwest Territory
Slavery had not yet been brought to an end in every state, but this was a clear effort to make progress in that direction. Despite this, a major reversal in this direction was about to happen.
By 1820, most of the Founding Fathers were dead and Thomas Jefferson’s party, the Democrat Party, had become the majority party in Congress. This change brought about a new congressional policy. This Congress passed the 1820 Missouri Compromise.
- Wallbuilders Live! - Special Guest Rick Perry, January 13, 2012, part 2 - YouTube
Find us on http://www.wallbuilderslive.com David Barton and Rick Green Tune in today to hear from Governor Rick Perry to get an update on the campaign and th...
The 1820 Missouri Compromise promoted slavery
The Missouri Compromise completely undid the previous policy that allowed slavery in almost half of the federal territories. Several new states were admitted as new slave states; Missouri, Arkansas and what is today part of Oklahoma. For the first time since the Declaration of Independence and the writing of the Constitution, slavery was being officially promoted by Congressional policy.
The Missouri Compromise (yellow and light blue to the south)
Democrats vs Republicans on Slavery
The 1850 Fugitive Slave Law
There were some other laws Democrats passed in Congress that were pro-slavery. One was the 1850 Fugitive Slave Law. Northerners now had to return escaped slaves, or else pay huge fines. There are many times when this law provided an excuse for southern slave hunters to kidnap blacks in the north—those who were actually free, owned by no one—and take them to the south to be slaves. This law destroyed the lives of many blacks in the north.
As a consequence, over 20,000 northern blacks left everything in the United States behind and fled to Canada. This is the period of time that the Underground Railroad was most active, helping blacks in the south, as well, escape slavery by making it all the way to Canada, all because of the Democrat’s far-reaching Fugitive Slave Law.
- Republican Party founded - HISTORY
In Ripon, Wisconsin, former members of the Whig Party meet to establish a new party to oppose the spread of slavery into the western territories.
The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act
The Democrats in control of Congress passed another law in 1854 encouraging the spread of slavery; the Kansas-Nebraska Act. This allowed slavery in parts of the new territory—to the northwest—where previously it had not been allowed!
A new political party
After passing all these pro-slavery laws, in May 1854, a number of anti-slavery members in Congress formed a new political party to fight slavery. These anti-slavery members were from the Whigs, Free Soil advocates and Emancipationists. They wanted to gain equal rights for black Americans.
The name of that party? They called it the Republican Party. They chose this name because they wanted to return to the principles of freedom and equality. These are the principles first put forth in the documents of the republic before the pro-slavery Congressional members had misused and manipulated to their own purposes those original principles.
© 2011 Deidre Shelden
Cheryl E Preston from Roanoke on August 15, 2020:
Thank you for the history lessons. You give us a lot to think about.
Deidre Shelden (author) from Texas, USA on April 12, 2019:
Mark the American Hawaiian, Thank you for your comment! I looked at further sources and have made a correction in line with your information.
Hawaiian Mark on April 11, 2019:
That is not true the republican party was not put together by democrats it was put together by 130 blacks and 20 whites that were tired of the racist democratic part.
Mark the American Hawaiian!
Jim Franklin on July 27, 2016:
Having taught US History at the college level, I would like to add the many efforts of Democrats even after the Civil War despite and defying the new amendments to the Constitution to disenfranchise former slaves by court decisions by the courts to establish and maintain segregation as an example Plessy v. Ferguson.
Deidre Shelden (author) from Texas, USA on October 19, 2012:
Kevin, interesting point and phenomina you bring up. Could be that black Americans have sided with their oppressors, believing what they say.
Kevin on October 19, 2012:
Great article. I've always been curious if there are more non white democrats than republicans because of the same thing hostages go through. The thing where they start to side with the people who took them hostage.
A few Things on February 25, 2012:
If I was alive in the 1800s I would probably be a Republican, but not this century. The parties today are not what they were then. Southern Democrats, the most racists, became Republicans after the civil rights era.
Ms Dee, for 34 years the wealth held by the top 1% has exploded, at the same time the wealth held by the middle class has dwindled; the wealth has been redistributed from the middle class to the rich. At what point can the middle class complain about it without you calling it class warfare?
steveamy from Florida on December 31, 2011:
Umm the Fugitive Slave Law was part of a larger compromise -- the Compromise of 1850 which included a number of other provisions including: admission of California as a free state, Texas surrendering land claims in New Mexico and the Federal Gov. assumed Texas debt, and most importantly the acceptance of Popular Sovereignty as a method for determining the slave status of new territories....
Deidre Shelden (author) from Texas, USA on September 21, 2011:
wba, I love your specific feedback on these little known facts! As we can see, it has been a hard, continuing struggle to try to do away with separate classes of people. Politics, even today, tries to use class warfare to their own advantage, like Obama is trying to do now, pitting the rich against the poor.
firstname.lastname@example.org from upstate, NY on September 21, 2011:
Thank you for sharing these little known pieces of history! It's a good point you make that the founders did not promote slavery, but it was the efforts of the early Democrats that did. I didn't know that the slave trade was officially ended in 1808 and that since 1787, government policy promoted the ending of slavery. It's interesting that Democrats now use the references to the slaves voting rights to discredit the Constitution.- Regards and blessings-WBA
Dexter Yarbrough from United States on July 30, 2011:
Hi Ms. Dee! Great history lesson. I admire your desire to educate us on things that many have not been taught.
I recall my great grandfather, while in his nineties (he lived a long time), remarking (back in about 1970) about how evil the democrats were and that the republicans were more civil to black people. But then my grandmother (his daughter) said that all that had changed and that the democrats were really for black people.
These types of conversations went on multiple times in black households. I remember telling my grandmother that I liked Richard Nixon and she flat out told me that he was against black people.
My point is that somewhere along the way, the republicans allowed those with a racist tinge into the party and never challenged them. Moreover, many black people came to view the republicans as snobbish and unconcerned with the plight of poorer Americans. These views are still predominate with many blacks.
I have known many white republicans that would give me the shirt off their back. But I also have known some that hated for me to be in their presence. It is these few that are the face of the republicans for black people.
What should also be remembered is that the original values and beliefs for some were not the same for those whose nation was forcibly stolen (let's be truthful) as well as those forcibly brought over in slave ships, sold away from their families and beaten for wanting "freedom." For many back then, those types of values and beliefs were reserved for white people. Many black people see this as being the same today.
Excellent hub and voted up, up and away!
Sueswan on July 29, 2011:
Another excellent hub Ms Dee.
I agree that we need to go back to our orginial values and beliefs.
Deidre Shelden (author) from Texas, USA on July 29, 2011:
SubRon, yes, we sure have a long ways to go :) Some I am seeing in our history is that we have to go back to our original values and beliefs. I also see in our history repeated attempts to pull our nation away from those. May America keep fighting to hold on to them and keep returning to that which has made America exceptional among all other nations.
Pamela, I'm so thrilled that you join me in interest and fascination with our nation's history. I must say that I'm getting quite blown away by all these things I'd not realized before!
Pamela Oglesby from Sunny Florida on July 29, 2011:
Your hubs on the history of slavery laws is fascinating. I had no idea there were so many laws. This is an excellent history lesson and I am finding very interesting.
James W. Nelson from eastern North Dakota on July 29, 2011:
Wow, the history of America. We have come a long way, but I believe we have a long way to go yet....