Updated date:

10 Important Questions Science Cannot Answer (Turns Out Life Didn't Appear in the Ocean)


My name is Faiz Karim. I love writing. I wanted to find a platform where I could share my information with people and fulfill my desire.

10 Important Questions Science Cannot Answer

10 Important Questions Science Cannot Answer

We live today in an era of ultra-rapid technological development, during which knowledge is progressing more and more quickly. you'd think that humans know everything about their surroundings now. However, this is often not always the case: not only are scientists unable to answer many of the prevailing questions, they're also constantly uncovering new data that refutes previous theories and hypotheses.
Bright Side made it a task to stay up so far with the scientific world, and decided to share with you the newest research administered by scientists, with the aim of finding evidence on variety of hypotheses.

1. Is that the Reality Real?

Since the start of its existence, humanity has tried to know truth nature of the items around it. Today, science and technology evolve so rapidly, that this subject has taken on a way more concrete dimension: could our reality be just a virtual simulation? The hypotheses on this subject are numerous and therefore the famous astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson decided to arrange a debate between scientists on this subject. you'll watch the video here.

For now, the idea that reality is simply a simulation has arguments for and against. Nick Bostrom offered three versions of the existence of humanity (as proof of simulation):

• Civilizations die out before reaching the post-human stage where they might move beyond their status as mere humans and, with the assistance of technological inventions, construct artificial models of consciousness.

• Civilizations that reach the extent where they will model artificial reality at will, for whatever reason, don't like better to do so.

• If the above paragraphs are incorrect, then there's almost little question that we live during a virtual simulation.

But the philosopher Riccardo Manzotti exposed his counter-arguments to the present hypothesis:

• A simulation always presupposes objects from the fabric world that exist actually.

• Being detached from reality ceases.

• All simulation needs an observer. A simulation is inseparable from the consciousness which perceives it.

This question isn't yet resolved, and it's up to you whether you would like to look at reality as a virtual simulation or not.

2. Where does consciousness come from?

At least once in our life, each folks has asked ourselves: Why am I me? How did I become conscious of my existence? In psychology, this is often called self-awareness. So what's consciousness: our brain, a part of it, or something else? Neuroscientist Christoph Koch and his team of researchers believe they need made progress in understanding this problem. They concluded that consciousness are often generated within the colostrum, a selected a part of the brain. The results of the study were presented within the journal Nature. However, many scientists afflict Koch's conclusions and it's still too early to mention that the source of consciousness has been found.

Many scientists believe that consciousness may be a collection of brain functions comprising the human psyche. Some connection of neural pathways allows an individual to perceive and assess the encompassing world. Then, the character of people is made supported education and environmental factors (financial means, emotional background within the family, etc.), which makes the perception of the planet unique to every folks . But at the instant , there's no confirmed hypothesis on what consciousness intrinsically is. it's also not understood which regions of the brain are liable for its formation and performance.

3. What awaits us after death?

Sooner or later each folks wonders: what is going to happen once we are dead? Recently, neuroscientists made a discovery that provides them the chance to answer this question from a scientific perspective. they need obtained interesting leads to experiments with people that are on the verge of death. The scientists recorded a really strong electrical activity within the brain in each of the themes after the asystole , followed by the shortage of oxygen within the brain. Of course, this has an explanation: thanks to the shortage of oxygen, neurons lose their ability to take care of their electrical potential and discharge themselves, emitting an avalanche of electrical impulses.

But it's possible that these results, and therefore the statement by Professor Stuart Hameroff of the Department of Anesthesiology and Psychology at the University of Arizona, will give us the chance to answer this question within the near future. The essence of this discovery is that an individual's consciousness doesn't disappear without a trace after death. it's literally absorbed into the structure of the universe: it's assumed that the mechanism for completing this process is made into our systema nervosum.

4. Does God Exist?

Many people think that this question depends only without checking . But what do scientists think? British researcher Martin John Rees has officially declared that the newest scientific findings have led him to believe that we should always stop seeing the planet from an atheistic point of view. Rees explains his position thus: God exists; this is often the sole thanks to explain the looks of the primary genital system.

To date, despite numerous discoveries, science has been unable to decipher the peculiarities of DNA molecules: this ultra-complex mechanism contains such a lot information that it cannot begin of nowhere. And from the purpose of view of the idea of evolution and therefore the hierarchy of intelligence of living things, there should be a stage of upper intelligence above us: a god, a creator, an architect, an excellent programmer, who could think and execute his project, our universe.

5. Do ghosts Exist?

Many folks love mystical stories because they provide us an adrenaline rush and convey an inexplicable dimension into our lives. But are ghosts real? Scientists have yet to seek out any evidence that demonstrates the existence of ghosts, and explains all mystical stories and events with different psychosomatic and neurological mechanisms. Our conscience sometimes deceives us about what we see and smell.

Hidden Valley Road: Inside the Mind of an American Family Kindle Edition

6. Can we awaken 200 years within the future?

Each folks has probably considered death and the way to avoid it ... or a minimum of postpone it. the truth is that our generations are unlikely to survive until such a thing is feasible in practice. But isn't there how to “advance” time by about 50 or 200 years for instance , by going into a state of physiological state , or, as we are saying now, into cryogenic sleep? ? it might awaken when the "immortality serum" was invented.

Unfortunately no. Scientists have yet to seek out how to freeze the physical body in order that not all the fluid in our cells breaks them when thawing. Of course, scientists try to know and solve this problem, but thus far the sole possible solution would be genetic modification of our body, and it might need to include physiological characteristics of reptiles and amphibians. These animals can fall under a state of physiological state (by the body's natural freezing) without harming their organism. If gene-splicing succeeds in doing this, then our bodies are often frozen.

7. When and the way did the moon form?

A new hypothesis about the formation of the Moon claims that the Earth's satellite formed during a "synestia": a cloud of gas and molten rock. This hypothesis was developed by scientists at the schools of California and Harvard, supported the results of theoretical modeling. The existence of a synestia as a replacement species of planetary bodies was suggested in 2017 by American physicists Simon Lock and Sarah Stewart.

“The new work explains the characteristics of the moon, which so far were difficult to know . Chemically, the moon is nearly just like the world , but with a couple of differences. this is often the primary model which will adapt to the compositional model of the moon, ”said Sarah Stewart, professor of planetary science at the University of California, Davis. Scientists assume that planets can exist as a synestia for several hundred years, after which they start to assume a spherical shape. But it also can happen that other celestial bodies form in them.

8. How did life on Earth begin?

Scientists still argue about the origin of life on Earth, because the three main theories on this subject can't be combined into one. But Armen Mulkidjanian suggested an alternative: what if life was born in water, not within the ocean, but rather ashore during a volcanic pond? Mulkidjanian reflected on the chemical makeup of cells and especially , the substances they accept and reject. it's been shown that the cells of all organisms contain high amounts of potassium phosphate and other metals, except sodium.

This directly eliminates the ocean from the list of possible "cradles of life" because in living cells there's far more potassium phosphate and far less sodium than within the ocean. Geothermal sources on the brink of volcanoes are more suitable to play this role, like active volcanic regions like Yellowstone. These basins contain an equivalent mixture of metals because the cells.

The debate, it seems, won't end anytime soon, and scientists won't come to an equivalent opinion just yet. the ultimate decision are going to be made supported the results of experiments with chemical reactions and photocells. this suggests that for the primary time in history, we are close to get a fuller explanation of how life began on Earth.

9. Is Earth Overpopulation Possible?

Whether or not one runs the risk of overpopulation often makes the headlines. But how plausible is this information based on real indicators? Numerous scientific estimates show that by 2050, the world's population could reach 13 billion people. Today, however, the entire population of our planet occupies only about 5% of its land area. If we put everyone together in Australia, each person would have about 1000 m². According to calculations by Romanian physicist Viorel Badescu, the maximum possible population of Earth is around 1.3 trillion people.

It may sound very heartwarming, but now the world is worried about another topic: How long will we have enough resources for everyone? It is estimated that since August 2018, we have started to use our resources "on credit" because we have already managed to deplete a large part of the natural resources before they can be restored. On this point, the opinions of scientists are divided: either the use of resources decreases from year to year, which threatens us with famine and wars, or we must learn to find and use resources in places of the world. Planet that were not yet used for this purpose. And we have to do it today; otherwise the future ahead will not be very bright.

10. What would a human body do without a brain?

There is a disease called encephalitic: it is when a child is born without a brain. This deviation is very rare, but what is even rarer is that a fetus that suffers from this abnormality develops in the uterus normally before birth. The only person who lived to be 2 years old without a brain was Baby K. But how could she live without a brain?

In addition to the brain, we also have the spinal cord and oblong, which are responsible for vital body functions such as breathing, blood circulation, and reflexes. It is for this reason that the body continues to function as far as possible. But with the complete absence of a brain, self-awareness as such disappears and one is unable to think, evaluate and analyze.

  • Bonus: What does this illusion mean on your brain?

This movement effect is caused by the very fact that our brains don't always correctly decipher and transmit the signals that come from the eyes. Often times, the brain also deceives us because it makes us see what we would like or what we are wont to seeing, and not what actually exists. this type of deception are often caused by a perceptual effect, which is how you perceive visual information. once you check out a fraction of a picture and check out to ascertain it in its entirety, the brain transmits information in several ways, causing a disconnect between the perception of a neighborhood and therefore the big picture. People with brain damage, or certain deviations, might not see the movement of this image, or perceive this illusion during a different way.

As we will see, science never sleeps and is consistently seeking to seek out answers to apparently philosophical questions ... And what does one think? Share your thoughts and assumptions within the comments below.

© 2021 Faiz Karim


Abdul Ghaffar on February 07, 2021:

Full of knowledge article