Skip to main content

May 2015 - The Google Update That Didn't Happen

22% of Google search traffic disappeared!

— Paul Edmondson

What Update?

On May 3rd, our Google traffic compared to the prior week was off by 22% across all of HubPages. Google has said that this isn't a Panda update. Even so, it's pretty brutal. I feel tremendously bad for Hubbers and the team at HubPages that have worked extremely hard over the last several years to improve the site.

We've spent the last few days looking at data and trying to glean any information from these stats. Here's what we found out about this recent Google update.

This Update isn't About Quality at the Page Level

  • When we analyze each Hub by internal quality score, we see very little differentiation between our lowest-rated and highest-rated content. It's extremely unfortunate to see really good authors lose a tremendous amount of traffic.
  • We compared the traffic losses of our hand-picked, high-quality Editors Choice Hubs that are on the main HubPages domain vs Hubs on subdomains and they both lost 22%.
  • We compared professionally edited, HubPro-Edited Hubs to unedited Hubs and they were virtually a tie at a 22% loss on average.
  • Squidoo-imported Hubs were down just about the same as original Hubs.
  • We compared how Hubs with external links and affiliate products did comparatively, and we didn't see any meaningful variation.

This means Google applied a site-wide ranking factor that ignores quality and subdomains. I'd call this a very blunt site-wide whack if your site is on the wrong side of this algorithm.

Change in Google Traffic by Content Quality

may-day-2015-google-update

Google Change vs Dwell Times

As with our quality distribution, we didn't see any significant differentiation in Google's traffic change based on dwell times.

Dwell time and word count are highly correlated. We didn't see differentiation by analyzing traffic changes by word count either.

Change in Google Traffic by Dwell Time

may-day-2015-google-update

A Little Differentiation By Category

If you've followed search, you've probably heard folks talk about how Your Money and Your Life topics are held to a higher quality bar. However, we saw the biggest categorical drop in our Religion category—perhaps it's just an outlier.

We compared our traffic change by category to another large site that was hit, and while we lost different amounts, the relative correlation was there across categories. This appears to be the most significant connection we can find, but it's still not very useful.

Change in Google Traffic by Category

may-day-2015-google-update

Looking at the Data by User

With most Google updates, fluctuation by subdomain is common; However, in the last update nearly every subdomain lost traffic. Looking at the buckets for HubPages authors, you'll see that this was a really hard on folks across the board. 90% of the accounts we sampled saw a decrease in Google traffic.

A big reason we are on subdomains is so each Hubber can be evaluated on their own merits. This update does not insulate subdomains and affects all accounts no matter the quality.

may-day-2015-google-update

Lost Traffic and Gained Traffic in Latest Google Update

This list was sent to me that highlights a few sites that were impacted and others that weren't. While Google said that this wasn't a Panda update, in my very small sample list, it does seem like sites that have had Panda issues tended to do poorly with this update.

Lost Traffic in Latest Update:

Gained Traffic in Latest Update

Scroll to Continue

Our Plan

Again, I'm truly sorry to Hubbers that have been affected by this update. We are feeling it as well. We will continue to do our best to get HubPages in Google's good graces, and hopefully reduce the volatility while we raise the quality of our site. As most people know on HubPages, we have put a considerable amount of resources into aggressively editing the highest traffic pages to improve the site for the vast majority of readers. At the same time we have been no indexing a tremendous number of pages. The hope is we can raise our overall quality to escape Panda once and for all. We will continue these efforts.

I'm going to pass this analysis on to John Mueller at Google and hopefully the search team will take a look at how this update is impacting the whole of HubPages.

Comments

Tessa Schlesinger on July 15, 2015:

Well how does one prove one's credibility? That said, Google has focused for some years on wanting only to have sites where there are qualified journalists working.

RyanDube on July 15, 2015:

I'm starting to believe more than ever before that some of the latest updates are focusing on expertise and credibility. In other words, is the writer qualified (have they gone to school in the field they are writing about, or do they have any professional associations in that field), or are they simply writing on the topic in the hopes of earning ad revenue? I think this is becoming more and more relevant with each update.

SHAR NOR from Miami, FL on May 26, 2015:

Thanks for the Update. Seen it late but still, it does make real sense now that I know what took place. Sure and why not? I trust Hubpages and it will always cover over everything!!

Jean Bakula from New Jersey on May 23, 2015:

Hi Tess,

It is really hard to tell what helps. Now that you mention it, my name only helps on the sites I work on the most. I wrote enough to be accepted on a few sites before the money went down to almost nothing, and I don't see traffic from those sites. A few of them still exist.

Tessa Schlesinger on May 23, 2015:

Jean, not sure that it is name recognition. My name recognition doesn't help me at all. If it did, I would get traffic wherever my name is, and I don't. As far as I can see, the traffic one gets is directly related to the popularity of the website on which one is posted.

Jean Bakula from New Jersey on May 22, 2015:

Thanks for the explanation Paul.

I agree with one of the above posts which says that name recognition may matter to Google. I don't write as much as I used to, but was writing constantly for about two years, and many articles I wrote three years or more ago are still strong, in a pretty saturated subject.

Chuck Fasst on May 22, 2015:

I am a new Hubber (9 hub pages) one month now. Still waiting to earn my first penny of revenue. Not too exciting.

Venkatachari M from Hyderabad, India on May 21, 2015:

Very useful and interesting hub. I am able to learn many facts about google updates and changes in assessment of content by google webmaster tools. Thanks for this valuable information to our hubbers.

Stephen J Parkin from Pine Grove, Nova Scotia, Canada on May 21, 2015:

I agree with Tess Google do not care what the writing is like only that the articles get traffic. Ironically you can have the best article ever and if it does not get traffic it will not rank. Google will rank new sites with good SEO, but if traffic does not come the rank drops fast. Site age and author reputation are what it is about.

Ads only pay if there is traffic if there is not then forget it and Google are a limited liability company so the bottom line is what it is all about.

Rachael Ryhn from Forest Lake, MN on May 21, 2015:

Thank you for this article. Sadly, along with my readership, my crawl rate has also significantly declined since this update. My hubs have not been crawled for 9 days, when they are usually crawled daily at a minimum by Google.

I have one hub that is a high-volume topic, and the has received 325+ views daily, and even up to 600 views for a few months. Now it is at an all time low of 160 views per day since this update. OUCH!

Sondra Rochelle from USA on May 21, 2015:

Given her extremely good number, Tess Schlessinger makes a lot of sense. Obviously the way she writes is working, event though it goes against everything we have been taught here. Again and again I see lower quality work or very popular topics winning the page views. I think she really has hit the nail on the head wit her comment!

Mark Caruthers on May 21, 2015:

Thanks Paul,

I'm doing my best to produce great hubs, I hate the term spam applied my to work.

Respectfully,

Mark

Sherry Venegas from La Verne, CA on May 21, 2015:

Paul, I am a Squidoo transfer and starting April22 I have seen an uptick in views. Since that date the daily traffic has been erratic with a few days of deep dips with other days going to peaks that reflect more traffic than the patterns of the past year. I was thinking my Hubs were finally earning their authority back.

Thank you for your concern, SherryV

Iexpert on May 21, 2015:

Believe it or not, as far as I analysis the whole mess up thing on HP traffic, I reach the point that all this happens after acquired Squidoo by hubpages. Squidoo got that and HP team added that dead content to this great site and in response this site also going to die.

Tessa Schlesinger on May 21, 2015:

I do not believe for one minute that Google wants good quality content. My experience dictates that Google wants popular content which already has a strong following. Google makes the assumption that if something has a strong following, then it must be good quality. As we all know, that simply isn't true. Something can be badly structured, have terrible spelling, but it is about a topic that is highly desirable written by a person who is very popular. Google would prefer for it all to be grammatically correct, but that isn't the number one factor.

Over and over again, during these past years, I keep hearing SEO gurus tell about how it is content that matters. And then the people write the content, and the google engine passes right by on its way to the site with 1 million followers all talking about Twilight. Um. Yes.

Google doesn't like content sites because it has no way of telling which articles are 'good quality,' and which articles aren't. Sure I noticed that HP has now transferred those articles it thinks are good quality to HP's own domain. I never thought that the sub-domain issue would resolve anything, because I don't think that quality is what the real issue is.

Since Panda, I have not been able to use Google search to find high quality information. Everything that comes up is related to business or some trite topic. Anything of essence is hard to find. In effect, the internet has become useless as a search engine to me because it cannot find good quality information. Ironically, before Panda, it could.

By virtue of the fact that only one article/website gets to the top of the SERPS for each search engine term, and by virtue of the fact that there are 7.5 billion people on this planet, it is inevitable that most people will not be number one.

It doesn't matter how good your article is and how much you keep it up to date with relevant information, and cutting edge information. The bottom line is that if you don't have the followers to read it, Google won't notice it. In order for something to be noticed by Google, it has to have a lot of human interaction.

I have noticed that algorithm over and over again on Google Plus. There' a reason I've had just on 40 million views in under 4 years. I have been checking to see what works and what doesn't.

So let me share it with you here.

1. It immediately gets the attention of a lot of people.

2 They immediately comment on it and they immediately share it.

When that happens, Google puts it into 'What's hot.'

I'm pretty sure those are top factors when google search engine decides to send traffic somewhere. It doesn't treally matter if HP ranks it according to it's own standards. Google isn't looking for good content. It is looking for popular content.

If you look at the sites that have gained traffic, they are all sites where many people congregate to chat.

Perhaps it's time HP removed its forum and made it possible for people to chat in a similar way on each hub. Or something.

Juliette Kando FI Chor from Andalusia on May 21, 2015:

Extract from the CNBC article:

"But why did HubPages see declining visibility across the site, even for pages with informative, researched and edited content? According to Gabe, the algorithm is ruthless, punishing an entire domain when it recognizes a certain percentage of spammy pages."

Quote from

https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/1346295?...

"Ad Limit per Page

Currently, on each page AdSense publishers may place:

Up to three AdSense for content units

Up to three link units

Up to two search boxes"

With 10 ads on every hub, all our hubs are extremely spammy.

Suggestion

Reduce the number of ads to the Google recommended number of ads , Adsense or other.

Too many ads also slow down loading time and discourage readers from engaging.

Sally Gulbrandsen from Norfolk on May 21, 2015:

Very interesting stats Paul. In particular I found it interesting to see the subject matter stats as I think I was less affected than some. I can now see why. Thanks for providing this information.

viryabo from Lagos, Nigeria. on May 20, 2015:

Thank you for putting our minds to rest Paul. It's been a couple days of worry and I've been tearing my hair out, wondering what I'd done wrong AGAIN.

It's a good feeling knowing that you and the team are working hard trying to get to the root of it all.

Meanwhile, I'll cease updating and tweaking till all this settles. Hubbing is almost becoming depressing, no thanks to G!

John Hansen from Gondwana Land on May 20, 2015:

Thank you for the info Paul. good luck with your future discussions with Google.

Marisa Hammond Olivares from Texas on May 17,