Skip to main content

Bluehost V/S Hostinger: Which Web Hosting Service Is Better?

  • Author:
  • Updated date:

Hi, I am Archana. I am a freelance writer covering a variety of topics. One particular topic I'm interested in is digital marketing.

Bluehost v/s Hostinger: Which Web Hosting Service is Better?

bluehost-vs-hostinger-which-web-hosting-service-is-better

You might be deciding between Hostinger and Bluehost if you're looking for a web host and wondering which is the better option. Let's compare the two service providers in this article so you can decide which is best for you.
This Hostinger vs. Bluehost comparison will examine the main attributes of both service providers. It will also talk about their prices, performance, security, and customer service. These are the primary criteria that will help us choose which is best for you.

Bluehost and Hostinger: a general introduction

Both Hostinger and Bluehost are well-liked alternatives, but Bluehost is more so because it is a more seasoned and well-established company. Hostinger is known for its low prices and excels the competition in terms of performance. Bluehost focuses on WordPress and business features but is less performance-driven. Customers with limited resources ought to use Hostinger.
Users that require cloud hosting plans (Cloud hosting is not a service offered by Bluehost), are unconcerned with long periods of outage, etc., might choose Hostinger.
WordPress users should use Bluehost if they want excellent WordPress hosting. Bluehost is also a good option for newcomers looking for trustworthy customer care and those in need of dedicated hosting plans (Hostinger does not offer dedicated hosting).

Comparison between Bluehost and Hostinger

Let us first compare with some hosting types of both host providers

Shared Hosting Features

Bluehost

  • Storage: 50GB – Unlimited
  • Monthly visitor limit: 32,000
  • Bandwidth: Unmetered
  • Free domain: On all plans
  • Free backups: Yes
  • Email accounts: 5 – Unlimited

Hostinger

  • Storage: 30GB – 200GB
  • Monthly visitor limit: 10,000 – 100,000
  • Bandwidth: 100GB – Unlimited
  • Free domain: On some plans
  • Free backups: Yes
  • Email accounts: 1 – Unlimited

VPS Hosting Features

Bluehost

  • Storage: 30GB – 120GB
  • RAM: 2GB – 8GB
  • Bandwidth: 1TB – 3TB
  • Free backups: Yes
  • Root access: Yes
  • Dedicated IP: Yes
  • Windows or Linux?: Linux only

Hostinger

  • Storage: 20GB – 160GB
  • RAM: 1GB – 8GB
  • Bandwidth: 1TB – 8TB
  • Free backups: Yes
  • Root access: Yes
  • Dedicated IP: Yes
  • Windows or Linux?: Both

Pricing

Hostinger is inferior to Bluehost in terms of value for the money. Bluehost's feature-rich, cost-effective hosting options let you get more for your money despite Hostinger's absurdly low beginning price. You may help yourself stay inside your budget by taking use of free extras like a free domain and a free CDN.
Both Hostinger and Bluehost provide 30-day money-back guarantees so that you can try your plan without risk and get your money back if you're not totally satisfied.
Given that Hostinger is by far the least priced web host, choosing one of its shared plans if money is tight is a prudent decision. Its basic plans are heavily discounted for new customers, but once your trial period is over, beware of renewal fees. Despite being more pricey, Bluehost is a great deal.

Usability

Scroll to Continue

When picking a web host, it's crucial to pick one that's easy to use, has a quick and simple website setup procedure, and has an intuitive interface. Fortunately, Bluehost and Hostinger are both quite simple to understand. In terms of the dashboard for Bluehost, it provides an easy-to-use interface where you can manage your account, websites, and more. It also includes a one-click WordPress installation tool, cPanel access for those who need it, and a pre-installed Bluehost menu within your WordPress dashboard to help you construct websites more quickly.

While Hostinger offers a quick website setup and is user-friendly. Users can easily find what they're seeking for thanks to the slick and straightforward Hostinger UI. Using Hostinger's special cPanel-like interface, you may manage your websites. Using Hostinger's Auto-Installer tool, you can easily install WordPress.

As you can see, there are a few differences in the user experiences offered by Bluehost and Hostinger. First, and perhaps most significantly to some people, Hostinger does not use cPanel. However, its distinctive hPanel is a decent replacement.
The second distinction is seen inside the WordPress interface itself. Contrary to Bluehost, who provides a helpful setup menu that is ideal for those without any prior WordPress experience, Hostinger simply instals WordPress as is.

The minor differences between the two hosts will depend on your specific needs. But in the end, both hosting providers offer a user-friendly service.
Performance
When comparing performance, Hostinger easily outperforms Bluehost. Even if more traffic could be handled, Bluehost couldn't compete with it in terms of uptime. In fact, Hostinger delivers some of the best outcomes in the industry. In contrast, Bluehost was just average.

Uptime and response time
Hostinger had 100 percent uptime in 2 months with no outages. Although that is a fantastic outcome, do not be deceived. Since servers need to be maintained, it is impossible to achieve 100 percent uptime over the long run. Therefore, you most likely caught a very excellent period, but more exact findings won't be seen for another year or so.
With a 511ms average response time, Hostinger's reaction time performance is really subpar. With the exception of one larger peak, the speed is very consistent during the same period.
Bluehost experienced 6 outages and a total of 11 minutes of downtime during the same time period. This still represents a very trustworthy result with a 99.99 percent uptime. While still very optimistic about shared hosting, this is a more realistic outcome.
The typical response time was 361 ms, which was significantly less than Hostinger's. However, Bluehost wasn't as consistent; initially, the peaks reached 500 or even 700 milliseconds before stabilizing at about 300 milliseconds.
Overall, both services showed dependability, and that is what mattered most in this situation.
Website tempo
Considering the loading time, Hostinger were more than twice as good to load websites..

When measuring speed, let us consider three factors:

The Largest Contentful Paint: this indicator displays the speed at which the largest portion of the website's content loads. A decent outcome is one of up to 2.5 seconds.
TTFB: If the page is loading slowly, the TTFB indicator might help us determine whether the issue is with the provider or the theme.
Fully Loaded Time: Naturally, the Fully Loaded Time indicates when the website is completely ready to be clicked on and skimmed through.
Overall, Hostinger is quick. There is no room for debate considering that the longest contentful paint was 849 ms. With TTFB at 207ms, the server originally responded fairly quickly as well. This demonstrates how quickly the server is. There is a slight delay from the LCP when it came to fully loaded time. It took 936 milliseconds for it to load.
Here, Bluehost is noticeably slower. The length of its largest contentful paint is 1.8 seconds. In addition, the initial server response from Bluehost, TTFB, is considerably slower at 1 second.

Security

Free SSL certificates are included with every hosting plan from Hostinger and Bluehost. SSL protects login credentials and payment information by encrypting data that is transmitted between visitors and your website.

The emphasis on security throughout Bluehost's WordPress onboarding particularly appealed. An essential security safeguard that is simple for beginners to neglect is updating your login information securely from the default option as part of the setup for your site.

Both web providers keep a close eye on potential risks online and have defenses in place to catch attacks. To remain ahead of these cyber pests, specifics on these defenses are typically purposely obscure. In spite of this, Bluehost is more honest about its security; it has automatic security updates, backup data protection, and malware detection in place.

Customer support
Compared to Hostinger, Bluehost offers considerably better help and support. It offers high-quality service and more help options, such as live chat and phone support available around-the-clock. Though helpful, Hostinger's knowledge base falls short of Bluehost's excellent commitment to customer assistance.
Hostinger and Bluehost both offer:

  • learning center
  • 24-hour live chat
  • Tickets

Hostinger currently offers no phone assistance at all in contrast to Bluehost's availability of phone service around the clock.
Last thoughts
Both Bluehost and Hostinger have a lot to offer, each with advantages and disadvantages of their own. m To sum up, Hostinger is the best choice if you want affordable costs and quick loading times. However, Bluehost is the right choice if you require limitless resources (bandwidth, storage, and websites) or first-rate support.

© 2022 Archana

Related Articles